Sentences with phrase «discuss the claims about»

It certainly provides me with the right background for discussing my claim about the incredibly close ties of science to religion.
Several high - profile Hollywood figures — including Jessica Chastain, Ashley Judd and Judd Apatow — took to social media Wednesday to discuss the claims about Ratner.
Also, Lucia has discussed the claims about volcanoes, but what climatologically significant volcanic anomalies have occurred since 1991?

Not exact matches

Sometimes, prospects are only claiming they need to think about it or discuss it with other people.
In a formal complaint and in an interview in New York magazine, an employee named Chelsea Leibow claims Ms. Agrawal discussed and touched Ms. Leibow's breasts in front of colleagues, exposed her own body to others at the office and demanded details about her subordinates» sexual proclivities.
Click here to claim your report now or get in touch with us right away to discuss about your project.»
Do not make hasty generalizations and insult people claiming they don't know what they are talking about when in fact the statement they have made is applicable to the vast majority of the cases which they are discussing.
To say there is no evidence for the real existence of the most discussed figure in history denies the unique manner in which Christianity came about (a claim that God came in the flesh conveyed with real life details, etc).
Mascall's argument, we have seen, is that in fact we do discuss meaningfully about God in these terms without claiming that our use is univocal.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
I have not discussed my beliefs in these posts, but you do claim to know quite a bit about them.
This WebMD review discusses the claims, ingredients, and truth about the diet.
Now that he has given enough time to think long and hard before recruiting a new man to his position, for a club like Arsenal youth Academy is very important, we can expect arsenal to recuirt someone who knows the culture of the club and the value we defend.And Arsenal.com claims that Arsenal will discuss with Brady about taking up some other role at the club.
On February 6, 2013, the day the consultation ended, public health minister Anna Soubry met with seven representatives of the industry to discuss their «deep concern» about a regulation which they claimed would hit Treasury revenues hard.
WAMC's Dr. Alan Chartock discusses a New York Times report claiming Donald Trump Jr., was promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet with a Kremlin - connected Russian lawyer during the 2016 campaign, according to three advisers to the White House briefed on the meeting and two others with knowledge of it.
Accompanying Parker's claims about the Wadjak skulls (discussed above) is an illustration showing a masked man under cover of night putting a human skull into a box labelled «Evidence to hide - Man before Ape - man».
There are multiple real things to discuss about this — the methodology, the relatively small number of cores being used (compared to what could have been analyzed), the age modeling etc. — and many interesting applications — constraints on polar amplification, the mid-Pleistocene transition, the duration and nature of previous interglacials — but unfortunately, the bulk of the attention will be paid to a specific (erroneous) claim about Earth System Sensitivity (ESS) that made it into the abstract and was the lead conclusion in the press release.
Peter Andrews discusses the Middle Pleistocene specimens from Java and China, and earlier Pleistocene forms ER 3733 and 3883 from Africa, and the later European and African forms such as Arago, Heidelberg and Broken Hill (Rhodesian Man).79 He claims the African specimens may represent different species or a separate lineage from Asian forms giving rise to separate populations of H. sapiens in the later Pleistocene - that is, Solo Man from Java may be directly ancestral to the controversial Kow Swamp and Cossack erectus / sapiens populations in Australia about 6,000 - 13,000 years ago.
HemoDynamic, M.D., the claim you make about all other nuts being inflammatory seems to be counter to the empirical information about nuts (especially walnuts) that Dr. Greger has discussed and posted:
Incidentally, McRobert's book Brawn has an entire chapter called expectations which discusses the truth about measurement claims.
Sad, pathetic little bastards living in their parents basement, downloading scripts and what they think is inside information about movies and actors they claim to despise, yet can't stop discussing.
Ryan discusses the information we know about Homestead and asks you if there is grounds to be upset or if it's all false claims.
On February 6, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan visited the Ed School for the Askwith Forum, «Fighting the Wrong Education Battles,» at which he discussed either - or orthodoxies about school reform, including competing claims about the importance of in - school and out - of - school influences on student achievement, and the struggle to advance both a well - rounded curriculum and school accountability.
Park City Manger Diane Foster and Planning Director Bruce Erickson discuss some of the agenda items for Thursday's City Council meeting, including a new amended plat for the Alice Claim project, which puts the houses into the gully instead of the hillside and members of a new group Citizens for Better Education, Jim Tedford and Ali Zeisler talk about why they can't support the $ 56 million school bond.
Ravitch not only provides the evidence of the falsity of these claims and reforms, she also discusses how current education rhetoric and policy are damaging our public schools, our communities, our democracy and most importantly, our children; how these policies go against everything our founders intended public education to be and everything science knows about child development.
The original bill concerned laws about all - terrain, utility, and off - road recreation vehicles, but Tesla claims that the «last - minute» addition of certain language was never discussed publicly before the bill passed the Missouri Senate and headed back to the House.
See: http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/the-e-ink-has-dried-on-kindle-lending-whether-authors-like-it-or-not-by-steven-lewis/ Note that, despite all the e-book reader - enthusiasts» claims about how nice it is to share and discuss e-books with personal friends, there are entire websites set up to trade loans of Nook e-books.
The report also claims that Apple will use the World Wide Developers Conference (WWDC) stage to tout «record numbers» about its performance that weren't discussed in the recent earnings conference call — so maybe we'll finally find out more about those Apple Watch sales?
Discussing a computer - generated image of a destroyed Capitol Building in Washington that was posted to a jihadist forum, the Telegraph claimed, without any basis, «The SITE Intelligence Group said that the image, showing a ruined Capitol Building in Washington, was created by extremists as part of discussions about the feasibility of nuclear strikes against the US and Britain.»
At the ever - fun Broken Toys, long - time MMO observer Scott «Lum The Mad» Jennings is discussing community relations, as sparked by an Aeropause article which claims: «The World of Warcraft forums are a good place to go if you're feeling pretty good about life, and you decide you need that attitude adjusted.»
«We see a lot of anger around the «net in regards to how things change over time with almost every MMORPG's development, with many claiming the developers lied about how something was going to work, or how something was perceived as being a certain way, and then when it doesn't work out quite the way players perceived, they claim that the developers deceived them, and that the launched product isn't anything like what was initially discussed during the development process.
I am happy to read more about this, and I have never claimed that there aren't important methane and carbon feedbacks in the Arctic, but the scenarios that people are discussing (and calculating economic damages from!)
When I was «debating» evolution vs. creationism in DebunkCreation with creationists, every few weeks we would have a creationist come by with only a first name claiming to be a scientist but would refuse to even mention what his speciality was — and it soon became quite clear that the «scientist» knew very little about the scientific method or any area of science he chose to discuss, and as such was clearly not a scientist.
There are multiple real things to discuss about this — the methodology, the relatively small number of cores being used (compared to what could have been analyzed), the age modeling etc. — and many interesting applications — constraints on polar amplification, the mid-Pleistocene transition, the duration and nature of previous interglacials — but unfortunately, the bulk of the attention will be paid to a specific (erroneous) claim about Earth System Sensitivity (ESS) that made it into the abstract and was the lead conclusion in the press release.
We can't talk about the need to organise global productive economy around the issue of climate change until we have discussed the same order of claims that were made, in living memory, about population, resources, and race.
You have claimed that nuclear is safe and failed to even discuss the question about insurance.
Chapters 6 — 7 discuss alarming claims about Earth's icecaps and weather, and show that these claims are not supported by scientific data.
Note I am not discussing whether the claim about most of the increase is true or not.
The net effect of a doubling of CO2 in teh absence of feedbacks is about 1.2 C — this has been discussed a great deal here and despite what some people claim is really not controversial.
Your claim about the stability of foraminiferal dO18 ratios also shows that you're unfamiliar with the work of Bemis, et al., 1998, which discusses the artifacts introduced into foraminiferal dO18 by photosynthetic symbionts.
And it makes very little sense, not least because, as has been discussed, such «denial» constitutes a legitimate legal defence in the face of litigation bought about by the «goodies», but also because there is no real substance between the two strategies that we wouldn't find between any form of positive claim about the material universe, and any scepticism of that claim.
While there are many issues which can be related to the choice of data set one uses which would be worth discussing, one simply can not claim things about a papers» results are true when they are only true if you use a different data set than the authors of the paper used.
Rawls claimed that he broke his agreement because the IPCC was dishonest in not discussing the «omitted variable» and THEN he said he had to release it because of the discussion about the omitted variable.
Giaever then claims that one person has talked about these effects - US Secretary of Energy and fellow Nobel Laureate Steven Chu, who suggested paining roofs white to offset some warming, though he does not discuss Chu in a very flattering light.
«I don't like to claim that I am an expert on anything, but I have enough knowledge about climate science and climate system to be able to write scientific papers and go to meetings and talk about monsoon systems and talk about any other things that you want to discuss about climate science issues.
443: (Bob) I take your point with serious consideration but the claim about 100 years is not true of natural gas and peak oil is not for at least another 50 - 60 years as discussed in last month's SA.
However, He gives no real references in the end, but, as a non-expert, I am highly skeptical about his conclusions, as he is not a scientist and has made some weird claims in the past, as has been discussed here I think.
Do you have have questions about an ICBC whiplash claim or an LVI claim that you wish to discuss with an ICBC claims lawyer?
For information about car, truck and motorcycle accident claims in New York, or to discuss your auto accident claim with an experienced personal injury lawyer, please schedule a free consultation by calling us toll free at 888.519.6400, in Garden City at 516.248.2234, in Flushing - Queens at 718.539.3100, or if you prefer, fill out our intake form and we will contact you.
You likely have a great number of questions about the claim process, and an attorney from Lavent Law would be happy to discuss your case with you.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z