Sentences with phrase «discuss the results here»

Not exact matches

Of the two results that issue from the generalization of a mathematical formalism mentioned above, we will here discuss the possibility of unifying subordinate mathematical disciplines in a new formalism.

Now, John Zarnecki of the Open University at Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, who heads one of Huygens's instrument teams and discussed the results at a press conference here, thinks it's more likely that the sticklike device hit one of the many ice pebbles that are also seen in Huyges's surface pictures.

3) Discussing the results of the original study, reproduced here, in the context of other work published over the last few years, would also be very helpful.

Presumably this commentor's statement about 11 degrees comes from the media hype surrounding some climate model results, which we discussed earlier — here.

Mouse studies discussed here at the Lighthouse have had inconsistent results which is why we were not hopeful that this supplement would work.

We here discuss commonly used normalization approaches and illustrate how these can produce misleading results.

The lab personnel are more than willing to discuss the results of our analysis should any company whose products are reported here choose to take issue with our laboratory procedures, suitability of equipment used, calibration standards, or experience of the laboratory staff.

Here we discuss their main results, recently published in PLOS ONE.

I'm seeing a good natro / herbalist / nutritionist here in perth and happy with results thus far but will discuss dairy fats more at next appointment.

Consider Diet Variation to get results, we discuss the concept and implementation here: http://podcast.drpompa.com/episodes/157-diet-variations

Here's what this approach looks like: Administrators make frequent short, unannounced classrooms visits (at least once a month), followed promptly by face - to - face listening / coaching conversations; teacher teams meet regularly to discuss planning, pedagogy, and assessment results; and teacher assessment is saved till the end of the school year, pulling together observations, other points of contact, and teachers» self - assessments.

First it is important to understand that most of the problems discussed here have been structural issues resulting from how school systems are governed and regulated.

But the NAEP results discussed here are taken strictly from the pencil and paper tests that were also administered to a nationally representative sample of students in 2017.

As a result, a significant portion of the teachers surveyed here report spending class time discussing with students how search engines work, how to assess the reliability of the information they find online, and how to improve their search skills.

The studies discussed here focus only on elementary - and middle - school students and teachers; they do not include high schools, where results might be different.

Here are some pointers for discussing Common Core assessment results.

Here we are going to discuss about the every aspect that is associated with the diabetes like its cause, precautions and harmful results of not curing it on time.

We've posted the Newbery results here, and added any other awards won by books we've discussed on Heavy Medal in the comments below.

I know $ 20 can't buy a lot, but if you apply the principle of time and compounding interest (as discussed HERE) the results can be astounding.

Nintendo president Satoru Iwata has already worked out the key things to be discussed at the next financial results briefing, here is what he said: Today, since this is not a Corporate Management Poli...

We discuss climate models a lot, and from the comments here and in other forums it's clear that there remains a great deal of confusion about what climate models do and how their results should be interpreted.

Dan H claims to cite the specific result discussed here: http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?n=1005

In summary, I would emphasise that the scientists and the actual papers discussed here and in the BBC documentary were not «alarmist», however there is a clear danger that when these results get translated into media reports (and headlines) that scientifically unsupportable claims can be made.

The crack about dissent not being allowed was not deserved here, but was the result of frustration of trying to discuss this topic in other forums and having my posts asking questions and making points deleted outright.

In January 2008, I discussed here and here how Hansen's projections compared against the most recent RSS and MSU data, noting a downtick which resulted in a spread not merely between observations and Scenario A, but between observations and Scenario B, sometimes said to have been vindicated.

With regard to the appropriateness of the Hofmann law and my fit of it to the Keeling curve, I commented on Dec. 5, the second day of this thread, here where I said Embarrassingly I discussed the poster with Pieter Tans, one of the coauthors of the Hofmann et al result cited in the poster, for ten minutes without recognizing his name until he pointed it out.

In passing, the results cited here by Wahl and Ammann had already been discussed in MM 2005b (but Wahl and Ammann fail to acknowledge the earlier discussion and imply that their treatment is novel.

There arises here the thought — to my knowledge not as yet discussed in this forum — that the Heartland Institute's donors appear to have suffered injuries as the result of Dr. Gleick's actions and those of his sputniki.

The paper discussed here tries to get some results of that nature directly making some simple assumptions.

In my opinion, for statistical calculations and the sort of thing discussed here, I simply do not believe that continued use of Fortran can be justified — it requires too many pointless lines of code and, as a result, ends up wasting money through low productivity.

Does anyone here think an adverse result of the the type being discussed in this post could have survived to publication?

Results from both sets of scenarios are discussed here since the preliminary marker scenarios (December 1998) were used in this report:

The MD99 - 2275 core offshore Iceland is a very high - resolution ocean sediment core, results of which over the past millennium have been discussed here from time to time.

Serious scientists here discuss how Cook et al. (2013) used a bogus sampling strategy to misrepresent the data and obtain a 97 % result.

Is the data contradicting the «big red dog» as previously discussed here entirely the result of radiosonde data?

Just guessing here, but I think the above response in the comments for the RC article by Minnett discusses where Rob Painting thinks Aaron Lewis is misunderstanding the skin layer and how the enhanced GHE slows heat loss from the oceans, which, obviously, results in increased OHC.

I've written about this before — here I discuss how the IPCC is naturally biased towards understating climate change: being too optimistic in its results.

I previously discussed here on TNW the blockchain is already falling victim to its own popularity — with limited block sizes resulting in painstakingly slow transactions.

Here, they discussed how to make all of the different implementations interoperable, resulting in a Lightning Network protocol specification dubbed «BOLT» (an acronym for Basis of Lightning Technology).