Sentences with phrase «discuss this subject here»

Now, whenever I discuss this subject here on the blog, or among family and friends, two major objections get raised:

But yeah, thanks for spending the time to discuss this subject here on your internet site.

But yeah, thanx for spending the time to discuss this subject here on your web site.

Almost immediately you'll get the notifications as it's one of the most widely discussed subjects here on Bigger Pockets.

Not exact matches

Here we should like to discuss this misunderstanding of the official declarations about such a preference for liturgical prayer, even though we can not exhaust the subject.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

And that is the point here where Iman Rauf warns us about enraging Middle Eastern Muslims by even discussing the subject of the new mosque.

I've been interacting a bit here over the past day, and I've only had ONE atheist / skeptic show a glimpse of knowledge on the subject - matter we were discussing (which happened to be biology).

And before proceeding very far on this subject in Christianity and Democracy, Maritain makes three important distinctions, each of which he discusses at more length than we can here duplicate.

It's a spiritual memoir of sorts that will touch on a lot of the subjects we discuss together here.

So I think this subject has worn itself out — nothing new to discuss here.

I will discuss different subjects here and give my thoughts and opinions along with facts I've researched.

The subject of reconstructions of temperature variations of the past millennium has been discussed many times before on this site (see e.g. here, here, here, and here).

This is a far harder row to hoe, because the changes in both forcing and response are small and subject to large uncertainties (as we have discussed in connection with the «Hockey Stick» here).

(If you want more information on this interesting subject, here's a video discussing this subject from OraWellness.)

According to the studies discussed here (Bodinham, Noakes, & Lobley), the effects of RS on insulin sensitivity appear mixed, but this is likely due to differences in study design, subject populations, etc..

Here is an incredibly informative resource that I found which discusses the subject in more depth and also gives solid information on the many reasons (such as estrogens in the plastic bottles of the water that you drink from * and even shampoos!)

Here we discuss the subject of dating a Cancer man, with a very tongue in Cancer man gifts.

She points to signs that might be commonplace in some schools but are minor miracles here: children naming math as their favorite subject, or discussing the many books they've read in their free time.

I suspect that the Amazon guardians may kick us off here when they see we are not discussing the subject.

I've discussed the subject of crowdfunding before, but here's a basic tip: maybe do one at a time?

By the time I rang the bell, my breathing had slowed and I'd done a quick mental review of the subject I was here to discuss.

(b) Once Chuck had posted, here [7] came Curtis Brown associate literary agent Sarah LaPolla [8] as backup to Wendig on «still a subject I think needs discussing.»

The implementation ideas discussed here reflect the views of Hartford Funds as of March 31, 2018 and are subject to change without notice.

I have discussed how I got here (Part I, II, and III), investing tips, embarrassing financial mistakes, and a variety of other subjects.

Great topic, here in South Florida we discuss this very subject quite a bit.

Without Mom Brain here to keep us in check, we wander off track, and discuss a bunch of oddball subjects.

Here, the Super Crate Box and LUFTRAUSERS developers Rami Ismail and Jan Willem Nijman will discuss the long road their unconventional fishing game faced since 2010, including the highs and lows of working remotely during stressful times and their approach to the sensitive subjects of cloning and IAP.

-- Suitable for 18 + — No previous experience necessary — Free parking and refreshments included — Weather permitting, we will spend time being still outdoors so please dress appropriately — Most sessions are fully accessible, but please contact is to discuss your mobility needs — Cancellations are subject to fees — see here for more details — Meet at the YSP Café which is a 10 - minute walk from the YSP Centre — nearest car park is off Park Lane in West Bretton Please book online at ysp.org.uk / events / still - looking - mindfulness - and - art Tickets cost # 20.

The subject of reconstructions of temperature variations of the past millennium has been discussed many times before on this site (see e.g. here, here, here, and here).

This would be an interesting subject to discuss on Forced Responses, where it belongs, rather than here, where it is off - topic.

[PS: This general subject has been discussed ad nauseum in previous years — see here for instance, and has appeared in the literature as well (for instance, Kaufmann and Stern (2002)-RRB-.

This is a far harder row to hoe, because the changes in both forcing and response are small and subject to large uncertainties (as we have discussed in connection with the «Hockey Stick» here).

(Although, given that your first post in this thread told Gavin that you «would point out a flaw in his logic», with no caveats or maybes, on a subject often discussed here, on which Gavin is certainly a high expert, I'm not sure what you mean when you say «tenor».)

The problem of how to address risks on the basis of less than adequate information has been discussed many times here, and is a topic subject to philosophical biases in all directions.

I would be most happy to have a conversation about this subject and also to discuss site and tree selection, and climate response — questions that seem to be of interest here.

Finally, the relative merits of RSS and UAH are not really germane here, although I am happy to discuss that at one of the threads I have done on the subject.]

I summarized the recent research on this subject here, and is also the conclusion in ongoing research by the Met Office, as their scientists discussed in a press briefing yesterday.

However, that is the subject of the topic before this («the futility of carbon reduction») and not what I believe we are supposed to be discussing here.

For all interested persons: Please make use of my Climate Science Search directory at Climate Science Search at my site (under construction) Climate Warning if you want additional information about subjects discussed here at realclimate.org.

I'm still a beginner at this blog but I'd like to learn how I can post a question, e.g., about sea level rise in the distant future, without having to post a «this question is on a different subject than the one being discussed here.»

I've capitalized the KEYWORDS in your nice summary of the detailed references in the subject document beyond the GreenPeace issue discussed here, for your consideration:

As discussed here, the FTC considers lawyers to be creditors and therefore subject to the red flag rules because they extend credit to clients by rendering services first and issuing fees after the work is completed.

A constitutional amendment discussed here to subject rules of practice and procedure adopted by the Arkansas Supreme Court to legislative approval cleared the Senate this week.

Since this matter has not been the subject of an exchange of arguments, I shall not discuss it here because otherwise I think it would be necessary to re ‑ open the hearing.

Here we discuss subjects such as free will, suffering, the nature of God, and the meaning of life.

Now, using the case in this subject article — and had that transaction been a double - end as is apparently the case here being discussed — what on earth could I have done differently?