We will
discuss voting patterns, likely voters and turnout in a later post.
Not exact matches
The most common
pattern during Lords consideration of bills is for amendments to be
discussed at committee stage, for ministers to agree to think about them, and for peers to force
votes at report stage or third reading only if dissatisfied by the government's later response.
Part IV uses this framework to assess the different
patterns of
voting on the Canadian and US Supreme Courts and
discusses the important normative tradeoff between deliberation («positive» cooperation) and logrolling («negative» cooperation).