Sentences with phrase «discuss your feelings as»

This openness, Mead adds, means discussing feelings as well as logic, and revealing your weaknesses as well as your strengths.
This is not a good way to start out Catholic dating, and you should discuss your feelings as a couple to see where you both stand.

Not exact matches

As office hierarchies became increasingly flattened and team - building exercises became the norm, managers increasingly felt compelled to call gatherings to discuss even the smallest of decisions.
«Use books and movies as an opportunity to discuss how characters might be feeling,» says Froh in the article.
With the arrival in Canada this week of Chinese Premier Li Keqiang to discuss greater engagement with Prime Minister Trudeau, we felt that our readers might be interested in learning more about these sectors as well as appreciate a backgrounder on state owned enterprises and the most current reforms that are underway.»
As Clarissa shines her spotlight you'll hear them discuss the ways to look great, feel healthier, be happier and more fulfilled.
The discussion about evangelicalism here at this blog for the last few days has been interesting, though I admit to skim - reading many of the posts as I succumbed to that Eyes Glazing Over feeling that I get whenever the essence of evangelicalism is discussed.
Telling someone that releasing their pain in public like this and feeling as if NakedPastor / The Lasting Supper is not the proper place to discuss anything human?
Whenever Mormons have a mirror put in front of them, they don't like it, but, they feel free to attack and discuss other people's faiths as if they are all authorities and I'm quite tired of it.
I have a feeling this is going to be a hot topic in the months and years to come, and we will be discussing it at length as part of series, though later in the year.
Since these are representative of feelings held by many clergymen, it would seem important to discuss them, as a potential means of enhancing good relations between ministers and AA.
If you read this article and think, «I need to tell everyone who believes in religion that they're fools / idiots / simpletons,» as a way to discuss the danger, I'd argue that you're not as enlightened as you may feel.
I feel as if the «obedience of faith» that is being discussed directly links belief in the Gospel account (Or I will say the heart of the Gospel account, since you view the gospel as the full life and works of Jesus.
Once the two are together in a conversation, topics may begin innocently, which once again, in and of itself is not immoral, but often times innocent topics lead to discussing topics that typically are reserved for spouses, such as feelings and desires.
It is the purpose of this chapter to discuss the interpretations gleaned from the writings of the old schools of Muslims — mystics and rationalists, including both the theologians and the philosophers — who are not usually regarded by the orthodox school as strict Muslims, but whose influence on Muslim thought and practical religious life is felt even today.
Take them one at a time, spending as much time as you need to discuss thoroughly the issues and feelings that arise: «The ideas and issues which excite me most are...;» «The things that are most worth living for right now are...;» «I feel the most joy (pain, hope, lonely, together) when...;» «What I really believe about God is...;» «I feel closest to (most distant from) God when...;» «I get spiritually high when...;» «The beliefs that mean the most to me now are...;» «The beliefs from my childhood which no longer make sense are...;» «Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like to..
After years of wrestling with the resulting theological questions, Justin started GCN as a safe place for Christians on both sides to discuss the issue without being condemned for what they felt.
Immersed as we are in gadgetry, living a lifestyle which, in its very making, is explicable by scientific laws, our culture feels an inherent uneasiness in discussing things that can't be explained in this way.
Since insufficient time has passed to assure to the books here discussed a permanent place among the sacred books of the world, such as that enjoyed by the ones that have so far been discussed, I feel it necessary to draw up a definition of a sacred book which will enable me to pick out of our modern world what may be called its sacred books.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
«I am happy to discuss the matter with them as well as to provide reassurance that the Remembrance Service in the church remains a Christian service and one in which everyone can feel welcome.»
The group succeeded in reaching a feeling level, discussing such matters as their perceptions of each other, feelings about having children as this relates to marital intimacy, and the grief experience of one member.
In a recent interview with the Washington Post (part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced in my life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I had.
As these feelings are being discussed, the counselor should let the person know, by his attitudes, that he respects his right to whatever feelings he may have.
I was familiar with neither, and spent half the book feeling like I was listening in on a conversation between friends as they discussed some event which only they had experienced.
They feel the same joy when a criminal gets sent to prison as they invariably discuss the special «attention'they'll get in the prison showers.
@ME II: As I understand it, he would not have been in a position to mock the Pope, if he hadn't felt it necessary to discuss the concept as a mere Dialogue instead of scientific facAs I understand it, he would not have been in a position to mock the Pope, if he hadn't felt it necessary to discuss the concept as a mere Dialogue instead of scientific facas a mere Dialogue instead of scientific fact.
As I understand it, he would not have been in a position to mock the Pope, if he hadn't felt it necessary to discuss the concept as a mere Dialogue instead of scientific facAs I understand it, he would not have been in a position to mock the Pope, if he hadn't felt it necessary to discuss the concept as a mere Dialogue instead of scientific facas a mere Dialogue instead of scientific fact.
For it would rather seem that because of Whitehead's recognition of the thoroughgoing importance of feelings as the initiation of all judgment and action that he is in a uniquely perceptive position to discuss ethics, if and once, the critic recognizes the centrality of feelings for ethical life.
When the men are in the fishbowl they can be asked to respond to whatever the women have been saying and / or they may discuss a question such as «How does it feel to be a man in a world where you are always supposed to be strong and competent?»
In his paraphrase of Cicero's On Friendship, for instance, he ably discusses the remarkable quality of friendship between those who «want nothing and... feel absolutely self - dependent» as opposed to friendship cultivated merely for its material benefits» with harsh conclusions about the possibility of politicians having friends.
There was a reluctance by me to post this as it exposes a part of our history that we would rather not discuss or confront, but I felt the need to try and explain a particular mindset.
I feel strongly that acknowledging good and allowing our spirits to be lifted by it is just as important and crucial to progress as discussing what we feel is wrong or problematic.
I hope you feel better soon and see yourself as other people do — beautiful, smart, funny, creative, full of interesting things to share and discuss!
As discussed on the MAC portion of this week's Podcast Ain't Played Nobody (beginning around ~ 14 minutes), it feels like I pick Toledo to top the MAC just about every year.
Jose Mourinho refused to discuss the incidents in his post match press conference, even walking out of an interview with the BBC, as he feels his side are being singled out and victimised by English football's governing body.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Having just written an article on how good a signing Xhaka is, before he has kicked a ball or even been announced, I thought I might as well go all out and discuss who i feel will be the best option to sit next to him, I feel he is the only player certain of starting in midfield next year.
Various ideas and potential initiatives were put forward and discussed, including a proportion of tickets being sold via a ballot, but as with away tickets the prevailing feeling was that abuses and shortcomings of the existing system must be addressed first.
I feel like I've written just about everything I wanted to write about parenting (and I don't like repeating myself) and I also find there are less common topics to discuss as our children get older.
However we have lost any form of intimacy both emotional and physical over the last five years and are both feeling frustrated and depressed but too scared to discuss it as neither of us want to face the consequences of another failed relationship and so there seems no answer to our issues at this point.
As a parent, it's your job to try to discuss puberty — and the feelings associated with those changes — as openly as possiblAs a parent, it's your job to try to discuss puberty — and the feelings associated with those changes — as openly as possiblas openly as possiblas possible.
Would like to discuss feelings of anxiety, emotional issues, concerns such as milk supply, pain, baby medical concerns, will impact breastfeeding.
Read blogs and forums that discuss c - sections so you feel well informed of the aspects that may not be as widely known or discussed.
But oversupply wasn't discussed as often, which compounded my feelings of guilt.
Is the discussion about the multiplier factor of tomato paste, the fact that congress is changing / attempting to change the IOM proposals, the fact that an ingredient in pizza is currently classified as a vegetable, the thought that pizza should be served a limited amount of times... I feel like I'm trying to discuss a moving target!
But once you get passed that you know there's a practically side to breastfeeding and just making it part of your life and being able to live your life and do it and be able to care for your other kids and do it and I don't feel like that is discussed as much, so that's the whole point of our conversation today.
Thus Chee - Kee's struggles can serve as an apt metaphor for discussing this feeling of «otherness.»
When I feel angry or stressed out, I will take a break and find constructive ways to deal with the stress, such as exercising, reading, writing in a journal or discussing my problem with a parent or friend.
Discuss the fear without invalidating it or making your child feel ashamed or as if his feelings are unimportant.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z