In December 2007, still long before Thompson et al,
I discussed bucket adjustments again, noting the impact of the Folland adjustments on earlier work (referring to Paltridge and Woodruff 1981).
CA readers are aware that
I discussed bucket adjustments on a number of occasions long before Thompson et al 2008, in particular, questioning the absurd IPCC assumption that all SST measurements switched from buckets to engine inlet on the day after Pearl Harbour.
CA readers are aware that
I discussed bucket adjustments on a number of occasions long before Thompson et al 2008, in particular, questioning the absurd IPCC assumption that all SST measurements switched from buckets to engine inlet on the -LSB-...]
Well, here we all are once again,
discussing bucket adjustments.
Not exact matches
The coordinating lead authors of the section
discussing Folland's
bucket adjustments are Trenberth and Jones.
-LSB-...] showed the prevalence of
buckets as late as 1970 (
discussed here), I showed in a post entitled The Team and Pearl Harbour that this directly contradicted the Team's Pearl Harbor
adjustment and even showed the impact -LSB-...]
I'm not
discussing the merits of the Folland canvas - wooden
bucket adjustment pre-1941, but the schedule of the implementation of the engine inlet
adjustment.
When we're
discussing Parker's «demonstration» on UHI, remember that Parker's previous claim to fame was his co-authorship of the Folland and Parker
bucket adjustment see CA discussion and references here.
To make an accurate estimate of the impact, it was necessary to include the effect of the new insulated
bucket adjustment — a point
discussed at Climate Audit and which I would have included in any Climate Audit estimate.
IPCC AR4 does not contain any mention of uncertainty attached to
bucket adjustments, although that was an easily identified uncertainty that had been
discussed here on several occasions.
Climate Audit on
Bucket Adjustments I've done a number of posts on bucket adjustments — which, as I've observed on a number of occasions — is a much under - discussed
Bucket Adjustments I've done a number of posts on bucket adjustments — which, as I've observed on a number of occasions — is a much under - discu
Adjustments I've done a number of posts on
bucket adjustments — which, as I've observed on a number of occasions — is a much under - discussed
bucket adjustments — which, as I've observed on a number of occasions — is a much under - discu
adjustments — which, as I've observed on a number of occasions — is a much under -
discussed topic.
I've urged attention to
bucket adjustments for many years and am glad that Hadley Center have re-visited this — it's now six years since the problems of the WW2
adjustments were first
discussed at CA.
The absurdity of Team
bucket adjustments had been
discussed in two early CA posts (here, here, here).