A view held by many contemporary metaphysicians is that the problem of induction, so much
discussed by philosophers of science, arises only because of mistaken metaphysical views; in particular views (deriving from Hume) about the nature of the causal relation and / or about the internal relations among different entities.1 Contrary to this view, I will try...
This is something like the «blik»
discussed by philosophers in an earlier decade, but it is not wholly noncognitive: explicating it requires propositions capable of being true or false.
Not exact matches
It is the purpose of this chapter to
discuss the interpretations gleaned from the writings of the old schools of Muslims — mystics and rationalists, including both the theologians and the
philosophers — who are not usually regarded
by the orthodox school as strict Muslims, but whose influence on Muslim thought and practical religious life is felt even today.
After all, I'm not still in that comfortable college setting
discussing «reality» as portrayed
by philosophers and the media.
The fact that science has now destroyed the Newtonian framework (so far as relevant to the issue we are
discussing) seems not to have been properly grasped
by most
philosophers, though Whitehead (1926) has spelled out the story with great power.
This rotation will include a selection of rare pieces, such as a collage of printed cutouts of
philosopher Baruch Spinoza's biography — a figure often invoked
by Andre when
discussing LeWitt's work.
Thursday October 17th at the Drawing Center,
philosopher Vinciane Despret was
discussing animal's viewpoints with Alexis Rockman whose watercolor drawings served as the first stage in the development of «Life of Pi»
by Ang Lee
The practice of hindcasting remains unscientific because it circumvents deduction and, as has been widely
discussed by the great
philosophers of our time (e.g. Popper), just because induction works in some cases does not prove that it works in all cases and does not make it an acceptable scientific method.