Sentences with phrase «discussed the things going»

In this website I will post links to some of my favorite sites, plus articles by moi discussing thing going on in Michigan football.

«They never shared or discussed the things going on their lives,» he says.

Not exact matches

The last thing I'd say is, and we haven't discussed it, is what's going on in China for Starbucks.

Though discussing mistakes and failures may be uncomfortable for entrepreneurs driven to succeed, business leaders are obligated to seek advice when things go wrong.

Like they say, the three things you shouldn't discuss in polite company are religion, politics and money, so I'm not going there.

But if the new management makes decisions that get in the way of your earnout, you'll want to be able to go to the chief to discuss things.

«We are going to be doing things militarily,» Trump added, saying that he discussed the idea with Defense Secretary James Mattis.

It isn't a paid mentor, it is a friend who you can talk openly about anything going on in your world, and discuss things like feeling isolated.

Khosrowshahi held an all - hands meeting on Aug. 30, discussing a number of things, including plans to go public in 18 to 36 months, as per The Information's Amir Efrati.

Go watch Mulcair's Economic Club of Canada speech where that's the first thing he brings up when discussing this issue (the portion covering this issue starts around 8:30, but the whole thing is worth watching).

Yet the first thing you discuss in your post is that you don't think rates are going to rise....

When you get to talking about GDP, there is a muti - page section which begins, «GDP is not, however, a perfect measure of wellbeing...» The section goes on to discuss things such as the value of leisure, the costs of pollution, the value of home production, etc..

The annual Incrementum «In Gold We Trust» report is going to be published shortly and contains a quite thorough technical analysis section, so we will keep this brief and just discuss a few things that have caught our eye.

Christians do not then force others to believe anything, but rather go to their homes as Jesus commanded his genuine disciples to do, seeking to discuss, reason and hopefully teach them about our Creator, Jehovah God and his kingdom, for Jesus said just before he ascended to heaven: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations... teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you.&raqugo to their homes as Jesus commanded his genuine disciples to do, seeking to discuss, reason and hopefully teach them about our Creator, Jehovah God and his kingdom, for Jesus said just before he ascended to heaven: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations... teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you.&raquGo therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations... teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you.»

It is not going to be easy discussing these things over the next years.

I have it on good authority he said «My wife... is such a comedian, always cracking up the apostles with her naughty jokes... Like did you hear the one she told about the Priest the Rabbi and the Pastor who were discussing how they apporting their collections and the Priest says «We go into the parking lot and draw a circle on the ground and throw all the money up and any that lands in the circle we give to God» and the Pastor says «Yeah, we do almost the same thing but give God anything that falls outside the circle» and the Rabbi looks at them both and says «We do almost the same thing to, draw a circle and throw up the money high into the air and God keeps what God wants...»

I'm not going into all the ways I've tried to discuss things with him.

Can you go somewhere to discuss things you don't find objectionable?

Leon went on to discuss how John the Baptist's heralding did not first go as expected but that it was a good thing because it taught people to accept reality.

In fact, I think that Jamal got himself in a bit of trouble by some of the things they discussed... listen to the two Podcasts and then go read his blog to find out why... You should also read Brandon's blog.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Both values are good and not necessarily incompatible, but if not articulated and discussed, it could be a point of high conflict if the responsible person likes consistency and persistence, while the risk - taker likes changing things up and going for the impossible.

While I'll openly question ancient scribblings, I'll not go so far as to attack the idea of a god to theists who do not wish to discuss such things.

Sorry — it's late here, I've been up since 4:15 and I just drove all the way across the state after a full day of work so to take care of my nine mile long wedding to - do list (no really, the thing is comically long)-- my sense of propriety and decorum for discussing dead animals along side a epically delicious pancake has gone completely out the window.

Before I leave you to go drink pink champagne and do #birthdayprincess things, let's quickly discuss this celebratory Buffalo Chicken Quinoa Bake.

so we're like not official but we already are sorta dating and sorta have spending life together plans and sorta have marriage plans part of it is that like her sister would prob go off the deep end more if we announced it but her parents joke about the idea more than we've actually discussed it so it's like a weird pseudo thing

«For me it is a big deal because the disappointing element about this is that we have a thing called the Strategy Group where the FIA, FOM and all team principals attend and we discussed the Marcin issue where there was great unrest about a key member of the FIA going to a team - in [that] case it was Renault.

On top of this, we discuss the annual and iconic «One Shining Moment» tradition and how we might add new songs to the end of the 2016 tournament to better represent things like Michigan State and West Virginia losing, Purdue ruining brackets, Buddy Hield and Oklahoma going from scorching hot to frozen over the course of 48 hours, and Syracuse's surprise run to the final four.

The BBWAA did try to change things, forming a committee to discuss vote expansion, but there are suspicions that it went nowhere because keeping things at 10 is a «subtle» way of making sure writers have an easy excuse for leaving off the likes of Bonds and Clemens.

Saints GM Mickey Loomis declined to discuss details on last night's meeting with Drew Brees agent, but said, «I think the important thing is Drew wants to be a New Orleans Saint and we want him to be a New Orleans Saint, so he's going to be a New Orlean Saint.»

The two sides were actually discussing a «mega extension,» to use Jon Heyman's phrase, but things quickly came apart when it was clear the two sides were not going to agree on the length of the deal.

I will go on holiday, leave my agent to discuss things, for him to look after all that.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Now although they could mean that the Board just intends on sitting down with Wenger to discuss what he plans on doing next, I think it's far more likely that if things do go well for the Gunners in this campaign, then the club will be more than content with laying another contract offer on the table.

When we are going to discuss about the renewal of the agreement, it is part of the things which will be discussed.»

So as Fiorentina is setting up to take a penalty, we don't really know what's going on other than things are still being discussed between the referee and the VAR folks.

Samir Nasri has become almost an icon for the Snood, no doubt whoever makes the silly things will be on the phone to his agent right now discussing a possible sponsorship / advertising scheme as the item is clearly going to be a favourite with the youngsters of the world, but if the Gunners don't perform at Old Trafford on Monday night then don't be at all surprised to see Nasri's Snood replaced by Arsene Wenger's hands which, according to my sources, has been all the rage in north London for years now.

What ever we discussed in our sessions of the things he said as going to do never get taken care of.

No one goes into a marriage hoping to get a divorce, but anyone entering a marriage without acknowledging the fact that marriage often ends in divorce would be missing an opportunity to discuss — yes, communicate, the thing every advice columnist, relationship expert and therapist keeps blabbering about!

Ask if your child can see a new doctor for a trial period; then, follow up with the pediatric specialist to discuss how things went and put both doctors in touch to plan for the transition of care.

Besides, I am not going to discuss profound details like how they manufactured in the factory, which things the manufacturer used to design baby changing pads and liners.

Still, it's important to feel good about ourselves in our bodies, and I think a lot of things are not discussed about the whole process that really should be: how hard breastfeeding is, perhaps leaving the workforce and the loss of identity that comes with it, going back to work and having to juggle quality time with baby and performing in your career, etc..

Alternatively, parents can make plans to talk with children afterward to discuss how things went.

But, while I had a good childhood, there was one thing that wasn't really discussed as I was growing up and that was money.Yes, I was taught basic concepts like saving money, but it didn't go beyond that.

And later when I asked if we could discuss a birth plan, she laughed and said that at the hospital, they joked whenever a woman came to them with a birth plan, they signed them up for a C - section right away because invariably, things went wrong.

It took about 5 minutes of helping him calm down until he was ready to discuss how to make things right, he then willingly went with me back to the cashier and told her he was sorry for his innappropriate language.

We have regular co-parent meetings to make sure we are on the same page, to discuss anything to do with the children, and check in with how things are going in both homes.

But as with so much of the adoption process, the choice is up to you.The important thing is to discuss what you want with your adoption work and the adoptive parents before you go to the hospital.

Mother's going through this should just recognize that it's something that often comes with having a new baby and the things I discussed here are excellent ways to combat it.

The postpartum meeting offers a chance for the mother to discuss the birth and her experience, ask questions, as well as discuss how things are going at home with the new baby.