Sentences with phrase «discussing an issue so»

Not exact matches

Changing the venue to a less threatening environment — your office instead of the boss's office, or even a coffee shop — may also soften the situation, and so may suggesting a walk instead of a sit - down meeting to discuss the issues.

So it is really hard to discuss any issue unless it is your friend you are talking to.

Millennial Trains Project arranges cross-country trips for young innovators so they can discuss key issues impacting society, explains founder Patrick Dowd.

The fact that so many founders around the globe (some are clearly British, another mentions his bedroom in Sydney, Australia) are willing to correspond with a reporter shows just how widespread these issues are, while demonstrating both the increased interest in discussing the issue openly and the remaining stigma (names were left off the article, after all).

President Donald Trump met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping at Mar - a-Lago, the so - called «Winter White House,» to discuss trade and North Korea, among other issues.

President Trump accepted Xi's invitation to visit China later this year so there will be plenty of opportunity to discuss troublesome issues later.

I have discussed this many times before in other issues of this newsletter so I will not explain why again beyond the above, but it should be quite obvious.

This meeting will be held under the Chatham House Rule, so expect candid opinions and economic, social and political issues discussed in depth.

Instead, Kalanick spent an hour or so with Kamel, sources say, to express his regret for how he behaved and also to talk through many of the issues they had discussed in the video.

We discussed the issue of how all of the aspiring product marketers want to learn how to create a buyer persona but the reality is that all may not possess the right attributes and skills to do so or to carry out an in - depth buyer persona development initiative that can last 3 to 4 months.

Most of their board members also participate in GFI's biannual strategic meetings, where many of these issues are discussed.72 GFI has also told us that they reevaluate their strategic plan twice a year and they do so in a manner that allows for significant input from non-leadership stakeholders.

If the Ecumenical Patriarch were to bring Antioch's issue into open council, so that all the Orthodox churches could discuss it and form a binding agreement, he would demonstrate his primacy — showing himself the first among equals that many Orthodox Christians hope he can be.

So yes, rational people will spend time discussing real issues.

Generally, they are asked by the patient or family member to visit, so that they may discuss personal issues that may be to painful to speak to with anyone else.

A large part of the problemvwhen discussing issues like this is that we utilize aristotalian language constructs that are dualistic and a major sign of this would be the use of the word «is,» when to be linguistically scientifically correct everything should be stated as «it appears so to me,» or some variation of this as it takes into account the many errors possible in how people perceive everything.

Don't take my recent postings with Dala too seriously, I have tried to be civil with him but he can not get past ad hominem attacks to discuss issues, and so I have given up with him.

The definitions and descriptions in the article are salient; especially, the «Psychopaths» and «Almost Psychopaths» definitions and «as percentage of population» (~ 1 % and an estimated 10 - 15 %, respectively) were important to help discuss some issues generally, and specifically to this post and the thread (though I haven't read anything in the last month or so).

* Note: I acknowledge there are many other racial and ethnic issues to be addressed by the Church regarding ethnic groups living in the U.S.. However, I am primarily speaking to the issue I know and live while trying to respect the fact that only so many things can be discussed in one blog post.

We will talk more about predetermination and foreordination in the future posts about Unconditional Election and the Sovereignty of God, so I don't want to use a lot of room to discuss these issues here, except to say that Scripture, reason, and experience all seem to point pretty clearly to the fact that God expects us to make wise choices and holds us accountable for the choices and decisions we make.

So many here want to jump to their familiar and secure «party slogans» rather than discuss the issue as adults.

The issue between these two orientations was not so much discussed as acted upon.

But thank you So much for this continuing forum so we can discuss these crucial issues publiclySo much for this continuing forum so we can discuss these crucial issues publiclyso we can discuss these crucial issues publicly.!

But this «Therefore» doesn't make sense if you look a the end of chapter 11, where Paul has digressed in a lengthy doxology, which while it discusses intriguing mysteries of God and praises God, doesn't lead to the logical conclusion that we should present ourselves as living sacrifices to him, but if you read into that «οὖν» an «as I was saying earlier», you can see that before the doxology he issued an important warning in Romans 11:22 — if God is willing enough to be so severe as to cut of the natural branches (the Jews) he will certainly be willing to cut of the ones that have been grafted on (the Gentiles); Romans 12:1 - 2 is a very logical «therefore» to follow Romans 11:21 - 24.

So why has the press, incuding CNN, tried so hard to make sure every anti-Mormon article is printed, linked to Romney issues, and discussed freelSo why has the press, incuding CNN, tried so hard to make sure every anti-Mormon article is printed, linked to Romney issues, and discussed freelso hard to make sure every anti-Mormon article is printed, linked to Romney issues, and discussed freely?

It was not so much that the churchmen were convinced the classical curriculum was the best; they were no longer capable of even discussing the issue in the breadth that it deserved.

In a widely read and discussed essay in the Summer 2002 issue of Policy Review, Robert Kagan analyzed the increasingly rancorous relationship between the United States and Europe in terms favored by the so - called neoconservatives who have exercised such a decisive (and controversial) influence on the foreign policy of the Bush Administration since September 11, 2001.

As far as the specific issue goes, of whether this is an actual presence of God in Communion, or whether it is «just a symbol» goes, I spent enough space already discussing loaded language to spend more time on how «We who believe in the Christ...» treats those who don't believe the details as you do don't actually believe in Christ, so as far as this issue is actually concerned:

I'm sure there are other times he has discussed it, so this might not be the instance you remember, but I know Frost discusses his issue with «Jesus is my boyfriend» songs in the «Dangerous Songs» section of «Exiles.»

Hartshorne does not discuss Hegel, but it is noteworthy that the questions he presses against Sankara reflect a preoccupation with issues which Sankara considered so ephemeral and lacking in substance as to be unworthy of the term «real.»

It is good this issue is coming out because it is something that needs to be discussed but there's so much yelling and arguing on both sides I'm afraid you would get as much discussion from a group of first graders.

I know that we've discussed this issue at length in the past, so if you've commented on the topic before, consider presenting what you think to be both the strongest AND THE WEAKEST elements of your own argument... in the spirit of the fast.

Sorry if that offends you, but I like scripture, and since this is a blog discusses theological issues, I will continue to do so.

If you want to discuss the issue then do so... nobody is stopping you.

If you suspect that a couple is pregnant, try to create an opportunity for them to say openly whether they are, so that the issues can be discussed frankly.

So when we, in the Church, discuss homosexuality as though it were an issue faced by «other people» who are «out there,» when we resort to stereotypes and language about hell and judgment and damnation, we may be doing serious damage to the most precious and vulnerable among us.

A parent (so often the mother — but the father has his important role too) who has got to know his / her child is often best placed to judge the appropriate moment to discuss particular issues with that child.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

I'll be open however to considering discussing the kind of issues with you should you take a different approach to the argument form authority should you show that you would like to do so.

In much the same way that Martin Luther had posted his 95 Theses on the church door in Wittenberg on October 31, 1517, for the purpose of stating his objections to the abuses he saw within the Roman Catholic Church and inviting church leaders to gather and discuss these items, so also, the Five Articles of Remonstrance were an invitation by the followers of Arminius to the followers of Calvin to gather for the purpose of discussing these issues.

The fact that science has now destroyed the Newtonian framework (so far as relevant to the issue we are discussing) seems not to have been properly grasped by most philosophers, though Whitehead (1926) has spelled out the story with great power.

Obviously, this is neither the time nor the place to discuss so radical an issue (Ogden, 1982: pp. 127 - 47; 1984).

In doing so, I have suggested that without a truly open marketplace of ideas, without a mass media environment in which all sides of issues are freely and openly discussed, we can not have a workable democracy.

The context in which Paul discussed same - sex relations differs so much from our own that it can not reasonably be called the same issue.

Our own position approximates to this, so we will now discuss the issues as we ourselves see them.

When there is a time and place where we could discuss these issues calmly in a group setting, I might be willing to do so.

when people get all huffy over my misuse of words or just plain wrong use of them i laugh, because i can bet my life that you still understood my meaning but rather then discuss the issue i brought up chose to insult thru the means of an english teacher — that i care not for... my point was a valid one and it makes me sad that you think yourself so far above me that you won't even bother with the conversation... tisk tisk.

The owners met with players in October to discuss the issues with and the possibility of a rule forcing them to stand, but were unable to do so.

So while I join you in wishing these discussions weren't necessary and also share in your nostalgia for a time when these topics didn't come up, I'm legitimately mystified as to how to discuss these issues without some overlap.

We have often discussed on this website why the Prof has been so sparing in his use of probably the best finisher in the Arsenal squad, but it could well have been a fitness issue as Podolski was adapting in that first season and was then inju8red last time.

You can of course discuss the issue in the comment section and if you like can even argue amongst yourselves if you so desire.