Sentences with phrase «discussing differences of»

This can be philosophical, educational, or even successfully discussing differences of opinion.
@JW: You and I are discussing the difference of scale.
Buffalo School Board Member Larry Quinn and Phil Rumore, president of the Buffalo Teachers» Federation, discussed their differences of opinion — and some agreements — Wednesday at a luncheon sponsored by Investigative Post.
We compared results and discussed differences of opinion, then went back to the data set to reconcile and repeat the analysis until we reached agreement.
We should explore and discuss differences of opinion rationally.
«I had a very good working relationship and a very high level of trust with the people negotiating Privacy Shield under Mr Obama's administration,» she said, discussing the difference of approaches of the two administrations to Privacy Shield.
If the quality of either of your work becomes an issue, discuss your differences of opinion.
Therapy allows couples to discuss differences of opinion, personal values, and their expectations.
Even if you hotly disagree with each other on a contentious issue, you should still be able to discuss your differences of opinion without resorting to yelling, screaming or name calling.

Not exact matches

Various factors may cause differences between Bellicum's expectations and actual results, including risks and uncertainties associated with market conditions and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions related to the public offering, as well as those discussed in greater detail in Bellicum's filings with the SEC, including without limitation in its Form 10 - K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to each non-GAAP adjusted financial measure used or discussed, and a reconciliation of the differences between each non-GAAP adjusted financial measure and the comparable GAAP financial measure, is included in this press release after the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Renaissance Capital IPO Fund Manager Kathy Smith, and Eric Schiffer, CEO of the Patriarch Organization, discuss recent market sentiment and the difference between individual and institutional investing today.
Sens. Roger Wicker (R - MS) spent part of his time discussing with Zuckerberg the difference between internet service providers — the «pipes» of the internet — and the apps such as Google and Facebook on top of it.
This session starts with a brief reviews the principles of angel investing and then opens up the panel discussion led by representatives from four Boston area angel groups who will describe and discuss the differences (and similarities) in their approaches to investing.
What it Takes to be an Angel & The Angel Investment Process (May 2012) This session starts with a brief reviews the principles of angel investing and then opens up the panel discussion led by representatives from Boston area angel groups who will describe and discuss the differences (and similarities) in their approaches to investing.
In our statistical analysis, we include all of the confounding factors discussed above, and control for demographic and regional differences in order to tease out the effects of different factors on whether Canadians support, oppose, or have no opinion about an FTA with China.
Alongside this, Martin discusses how he and his co-founders raised funds on both sides of the Atlantic, and the differences between Angel Investors in each country.
We have identified three main sources of difference between the Budget / Public Accounts and the Estimates: accrual accounting (already discussed); the universe covered; and the lapse.
As Draghi stressed when discussing the rise in U.S. yields: «Increase in yields in the U.S. to be expected because of differences in business cycles and the fiscal expansion recently enacted.
That being said, I like to discuss differences and see if there is something to gain from another's perspective and if they wish, to receive some of my perspective as well.
And with that said... I certainly agree with what - Frogist said, and I would just add that even in being «kind» and «respectful» discussing your «beliefs» would not necessarily cause you or other believers to feel «a whole lot of difference
And one result of the final reconciliation between Professor Hawkins and the administration has been a plan to enhance our ongoing engagement with Islam through formal interfaith activity that will now be a regular feature of Wheaton campus life, which means Muslims coming to our campus to discuss both our many similarities and our crucial differences.
In class one day, we discussed the differences between, say, an ISIS propaganda video, which is designed expressly to project power and instill fear in viewers; cable news coverage of the same event; and how that event might be treated by a novelist.
In discussing the loss of culture, manners, belief» once associated with the American South as stereotypical, in contrast to the North as the «land of industry»» Percy remarks the dissolving of those differences, though in some degree they once obtained in our history.
Instead he organized this conference to be «multi-faith,» so that people could discuss openly and frankly the differences of the three Abrahamic faiths.
We are obligated to listen to one another, and to discuss our differences across denominational lines, theological persuasions — and even across the center aisle of the sanctuary (where one side of the church prefers Paul Tillich, the other side, Left Behind).
At last Millikan, after discussing this difference between Jeans and himself, wrote, «The one thing upon which we can agree is that neither of us knows anything about it.»
In the first section three points will be discussed: First, the basic relationship between democracy and the Church, secondly a fundamental difference between applying the concept of democracy to secular society and applying it to the Church, and thirdly that despite this radical differ - ence the question about democracy in the Church may yet be posed.
This limits the amount of attention we can usefully give it, both because we have to waste so much time defining terms before we can discuss it, and because the fluidity of the terms is a sure sign that the idea will not make much difference in the end.
Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..
Regarding knowledge of possibility, we can, for present purposes, avoid discussing the well - known difference between Whitehead and Hartshorne as to whether God has a primordial vision of all eternal objects (possibility), as Whitehead asserts, or whether God derives eternal objects from the world, as Hartshorne does.
But whatever the differences of level, there is a certain general typology to be discussed here.
It makes no sense to discuss the differences from a moral standpoint, for in theory the differences are solely a result of human will and preference.
The Freudians and Jungians are good at convincing people that there is a distinction between conscious and unconscious experience, but they are of precious little help when it comes to discussing the metaphysical ground of that difference (the former growing reductionist and the latter mystical).
We have visited this territory already in discussing Whitehead's early interpretation of Bergson's view of the intellect, which turns out to be not a difference of doctrine, but a misunderstanding on Whitehead's part of Bergson's view.
Despite the difference between this form of political theology and that which had been discussed earlier, Hans Maier suggested that there are analogous weaknesses.
There are important theological differences among these three leaders of political theology, and it will be necessary to discuss some of them.
That said, some of these gatherings have been more effective than others, the least effective being those comprised of little more than a sanctified coffee klatch followed by a joint statement memorializing our choice of sweeteners, and the most effective being those where actual differences between groups are discussed and possible avenues for collaboration explored.
He discusses language, style and arrangement of the Qur» an, as well as differences between the early (Meccan) and later (Medinan) revelations and the importance of the «occasions of revelation» for understanding particular passages.
(there are other differences that involve 3 different ancient Hebrew traditions and slightly differing versions of the flood account - but too involved to discuss now)
In Session 4 of Sent, we discuss the difference between the people of the world and the fallen system of ideas that work in rebellion to God.
The guiding principle of British philosophy has in fact been that every difference must make a difference, every theoretical difference somewhere issue in a practical difference, and that the best method of discussing points of theory is to begin by ascertaining what practical difference would result from one alternative or the other being true.
Since they are close neighbors and business associates, the worshipers in the first churches find little religious or theological distinction between the two congregations, and some of them expressed discomfort with my attempt to discuss with them whatever differences there might be.
In his study of Goethe's epic Hermann und Dorothea Humboldt discusses the function of art as idealization by means of the imagination, the concept of artistic objectivity and artistic truth, the difference between classical and modern poetry, and finally, the epic as the genre of humanitas (Humanität).
A lot of people have trouble telling the difference between a debate and an argument but I can as.sure you that I'm here to discuss the ins and outs of religion (especially christianity since this blog seems to attract mostly christians... and atheists).
7 In discussing an earlier version of this paper, Hall responded that while there might be some aesthetic quality associated with technology, the «difference of degree» between this and the aesthetic character of other modes of human activity is so great as to constitute a «difference in kind.»
19 Palter, in Whitehead's Philosophy of Science, chapters VIII, IX, and appendix IV, discusses the specific scientific and mathematical differences between the Einsteinian and the Whiteheadian formulations.
The important difference between this new kind of structure and the kinds previously discussed is that the new sort exists in open rather than in closed systems.
The author discusses differences in the concept of God between Christian and Muslim, but suggests there is enough in common to make a productive comparison.
So, we can discuss our religious differences (those many gulfs that separate us), understanding that it is largely a waste of time (depending on what our motivation is) and just enjoy the dialogue, or we can talk about wine, movies, etc..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z