Not exact matches
The
first example is an enduring object, and Whitehead
discusses this example for three
sentences.
In
discussing his results, Herman states that they demonstrate the ability of dolphins to respond correctly to semantically reversible
sentences, offering «the
first substantial evidence of syntactic processing of a string of lexical items by animals» (CSBD 199) 12 Evidence for such syntactic processing is found in the dolphins» correct responses to
sentences having modifiers to direct and / or indirect objects: reversal errors were extremely rare.
@Phillip - noted, However: the
first sentence explicitly answers the question posed by the OP, specifically» have Chairman Nunes or any other Republicans on the committee publicly
discussed why they voted against releasing the Democratic memo?»
Let's start with you fixing the faulty reasoning in both of the
sentences in your
first paragraph, and then maybe, if you accomplish that goal in good faith, we'd have a starting point for
discussing the rest of your comment.
First, we should be clear that these paragraphs are
discussing the same figure, as noted in the respective opening
sentences.
When you write «it is dishonest» in the second
sentence, it seems a clear reference to the «deletion of adverse data»
discussed in the
first sentence.
The United States
Sentencing Commission will hold its
first hearing on Wednesday to
discuss a set of proposals to lengthen prison terms for people caught with the synthetic opioid.
Use the
first sentence of your professional summary to
discuss why you want a job in this industry and how your education has prepared you for success.