Sentences with phrase «discussing the matter with party»

Not exact matches

Certain matters discussed in this news release are forward - looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, doubts about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, the need to obtain additional funding, risks in product development plans and schedules, rapid technological change, changes and delays in product approval and introduction, customer acceptance of new products, the impact of competitive products and pricing, market acceptance, the lengthy sales cycle, proprietary rights of the Company and its competitors, risk of operations in Israel, government regulations, dependence on third parties to manufacture products, general economic conditions and other risk factors detailed in the Company's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

She was of the view that Ernesto Yeboah has not investigated the issue carefully before taking the President to CHRAJ; stressing «it was his decision and not ours, and if he has discussed with the party, we would have investigated the issue to ascertain the truth in the matter and then decide on it.»

«The letter, which was not the product of any issue or matter discussed with or at any party meeting, came suddenly.

He stated that he would discuss the matter with Labour Chief Whip Rosie Winterton, and would be writing to Labour Party leader Ed Miliband to explain his circumstances.

According to the source, «the President had discussed this opinion with the party's leadership and this was why the party wrote to the Attorney General of the Federation to provide his advice on the matter.

Have you discussed the child's birth injury with any insurance representative or attorney representing other parties involved in the matter?

Below Andrew Miller QC, Civil and Commercial Mediator at 2 Temple Gardens, discusses with Lawyer Monthly the issues surrounding mediation, and what parties should do to maximise chances of success when entering into alternative matters of dispute resolution.

You can discuss matters and clients with colleagues, invite clients or other third - party individuals to connect via a secure portal, and receive real - time notifications when changes are made to data.

Such agreements force the parties involved to discuss openly and honestly with their citizens matters that might otherwise remain untouched and accepted due to tradition, societal convention, politics, religion, out - of - date law, science or belief, or other reasons.

Likewise, if the parties are required under the contract to discuss the issues in dispute (by, for example, a series of escalating meetings concluding with a meeting of Managing Directors) before proceedings can be issued, then there is perhaps a greater chance that the matter will be resolved without the need for the Court to be involved.

When the parties appeared before Justice Pazaratz he told them to go and discuss the matter to see if they could reach a «sensible resolution» and that «if they didn't come to their senses I would formally request that the Area Director of Legal Aid Ontario attend before me to justify the obscene expenditure of tax money on a simple case with such an obvious solution» (para 31).

You can feel confident that no information about your private matters will be discussed with any other party.

Court Mandated Alternative Dispute Resolution - In Vermont federal courts, after an opportunity for limited discovery, the parties, their lawyers, and representatives from insurance companies covering the defendant must meet with a neutral evaluator who is knowledgeable in the subject matter of the litigation to discuss all aspects of the case.

On November 25, 2014, counsel for the defendant brought a motion for a court order that would prevent the parties, their attorneys, and agents of both from «discussing this case with the media or making statements to the media or on the internet, including social media, other than matters of public record.»

Having a website (even with third - party ads) that discuss ZFS - related matters is similar to the iPhone example in my mind.

If, before commencement, parties to proceedings attended a conference with a family and child counsellor or a welfare officer to discuss the matter to which the proceedings relate, the attendance at that conference is taken to satisfy the requirement in subsection 65F (2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (as amended by this Schedule) to attend a conference with a family counsellor.

A tiered system of participation may allow for certain procedural matters, including many of those discussed in this submission, to be dealt with more expeditiously by only requiring the consent of the «key players» to the proceeding, usually the claimant and the government party.

In more spesific terms, if, in the future, the program carried out in this Memorandum of Understanding should result in matters unincluded in it, BOTH PARTIES are required to discuss such matters in a separated session in terms with valid laws / bills.

As a matter of fact, recently I was talking with somebody I know who is going through a divorce and we discussed that when you hire two lawyers who are going to be on opposite sides trying to get the most from the opposing party, all it's going to do is create friction and animosity between those two parties.

Replacement Spouse: Some alienating parents abandon the normal parent - child relationship in favor of one that is more like spouse - spouse, through things like discussing financial matters, their relationships with third parties, and otherwise using the children as emotional confidants.

Unlike the traditional litigation approach where each party is represented by an attorney and the matter proceeds through the courts, mediation allows the parties to work together with the help of a trained professional, to discuss their issues and to arrive at an agreement that works best for both of them and for their family.

As applied to the practice of family law, mediation entails both parties meeting together with a neutral third - party mediator to discuss the matters at hand.