Sentences with phrase «discussing things of interest»

Not exact matches

One of the most interesting things I discuss in my book Mapping Innovation is what I call the new era of innovation, which will create profoundly new technologies, classes of data and business models.

I've discussed how things like actual interest rates paid, loan balances and arrears vary over time and across different types of mortgages and borrowers.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

When you all approach one another trying to beat each other to death with your «obviously superior» knowledge, we have a gift of the Internet and Freedom to discuss these things with respect and with the interest of bettering ourselves and everyone else.

A lot of extra things are discussed but I think it is not strange to be just as interested in what people have to add as well as the original idea.

I hope you feel better soon and see yourself as other people do — beautiful, smart, funny, creative, full of interesting things to share and discuss!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

i'd be much more interested in discussing things on the merits, but you seem incapable of doing that, and resort to the same refrains, over and over and over.

It seems like a good test for partisan gerrymanders that are unfair, but there would be a lot of other factors or dimensions (as discussed in the other answers - things like common economic interests) that might also make a district's representation unfair even within the efficiency threshold.

So if in discussing things we came to some interesting conclusion, his interpretation of it was, «Gee, boy, I'm smart.»

There are multiple real things to discuss about this — the methodology, the relatively small number of cores being used (compared to what could have been analyzed), the age modeling etc. — and many interesting applications — constraints on polar amplification, the mid-Pleistocene transition, the duration and nature of previous interglacials — but unfortunately, the bulk of the attention will be paid to a specific (erroneous) claim about Earth System Sensitivity (ESS) that made it into the abstract and was the lead conclusion in the press release.

I'm fairly talkative and like to discuss a wide range of things, as well I'm always interested in learning new things and seeing new perspectives.

Then do a little research about things of his / her interests and discusses them on date.

Some things to be discussed when making a mutually beneficial sugar dating agreement include whether you'll require a monthly allowance or let your Sugar Daddy take care of your bills, how often he expects you to meet him and if you need to be available on demand, where your meetings will take place and how you plan to stay in contact, whether he is expected to give you any gifts and whether you are interested in accompanying him in his travels.

The only real interesting things to discuss here are the choices of the filmmakers.

While Goyer and Biel discuss more about the actual production of the film, Reynolds provides plenty of comedy on the side to keep things interesting.

Our guest was paranormal and science fiction romance author, Veronica Scott, and we also discussed some of the many things she's doing to foster growth and awareness of the SFR genre among readers who might be interested.

In addition, Richard provides an overview of the different systems and he and Perry discuss some of the other interesting things happening in the world of publishing, such as Kindle Worlds, and how they may impact the future for authors.

On the valuations of stocks, it feels like the thing that is driving recent increases in P / E is that the masses are becoming more accustomed to the ideas that 1) the entire world is getting older, 2) aging puts negative pressure on interest rates, 3) interest rates will be low for a long time, and 4) stocks should be valued with earnings yields at a slight premium to 10 year Treasury yields (as discussed in your last post).

As discussed last month, this is a bit of a too much of a good thing crash all around — tax cuts into a strong economy sending inflation and interest rates high enough to lead the Federal Reserve to (potentially) over react and raise rates too high, causing a recession and growing debt issues as the government refinances debt at higher rates, all while a tax cut reduces federal revenues.

We'll discuss what types of toys to purchase, how to get your dog interested in playing with their stuff instead of your valuable things, etc..

He discussed the dream of a super PAC, saying, «We're going to push, really push for things we think are in the best interests of veterinary professionals.»

While they discussed many interesting things, including the company's firing of around 1,500 employees, its troubles throughout the past year and the new direction the company is headed, Riccitiello was also not above admitting that EA had made a few mistakes here and there.

Jim Rossignol over at Offworld recently had the opportunity to sit down with writer / designer / spokesman Chet Faliszek to discuss his changing role within Valve, the company's culture, its fans and a few interesting things about the worlds of Left 4 Dead and Half - Life.

Don't own an xb, but I do own a slim and some common sense in knowing that games I own outlasts the systems I own, BC also make sense for those who are interested in trading in they're old consoles for the newer iteration One final thing, if BC wasn't so important and not a topic worth of discussing why has this comment section blown up as much as it did?

Being able to help shape a character's background setting, and also discussing for hours on end with Harada and other key people about interesting ideas for the story, or new characters, is still one of the things I still enjoy most.

When Twin Galaxies spoke with Phoenix Labs Head of Community Development Ian Tornay at PAX South 2018, Tornay discussed a robust and passionate community of players that constantly challenge the Phoenix Labs team to do more interesting things week after week.

Where things get interesting is when he discusses expanding the scope of the project, mentioning the Switch as a possible platform.

That interest and belief in the excitement over those new titles was lost when Tim Schafer came on stage right after the trailer for Headlander, his new side scrolling Shadow Complex-esque title, to talk about Full Throttle and Day of the Tentacle being remastered I threw up my hands and asked the gods of gaming why, why must we be subjected to the constantrecycling of old games because we are too scared to invest the time and effort into new IP?!?! The one interesting thing he discussed was the fact that Psychonauts 2 would feature a mode playable in Virtual Reality, called Rhombus of Ruin.

Browne discusses her studio practice and a range of topics related to her work including color and working in «the gap between somebody looking at something directly and... looking at a photograph of the thing... I'm... interested in trying to pick up a little bit of that sensation... that... being there feeling, but also the shift between the two.»

She is interested in surfaces, structures and the space / tension between things whilst looking to expose and discuss, the politics, perversities and movement of power within and around structures of production and the production of being.

Brown is again self - effacing in discussing the press's cadre of artists, stating in an interview earlier this year, «it seems like artists have selected us more than we selected them... it's kind of a snowball thing» — but choices were nonetheless made, undoubtedly fueled by Brown's broad intellectual interests.

There are multiple real things to discuss about this — the methodology, the relatively small number of cores being used (compared to what could have been analyzed), the age modeling etc. — and many interesting applications — constraints on polar amplification, the mid-Pleistocene transition, the duration and nature of previous interglacials — but unfortunately, the bulk of the attention will be paid to a specific (erroneous) claim about Earth System Sensitivity (ESS) that made it into the abstract and was the lead conclusion in the press release.

You can point the finger at all sorts of participants in this battle, but I believe (and we have been examining and discussing at length on this site for more than 8 years now) the principal drivers of the polarization are coming more from: (1) the corporate energy interests who are protecting their profits against regulation and other policies that would move the system away from fossil fuels, and using their clout in the political process to tie things up; (2) right - wing anti-government and anti-regulatory ideologues whose political views appear threatened by scientific conclusions that point toward a need for stronger policy action; (3) people whose religious or cultural identities appear threatened by modern science; and so forth.

My take home from these emails is that my argument isn't particularly original (this kind of thing is endemic and widely discussed in other fields) and my argument was too narrow (I didn't include the increasing financial interests and big $ $ in all this, as well as politicians investing their careers in this.)

To me, this was one of the most interesting things to discuss with the people I interviewed for my ebook, Life in a Tiny House.

I was particularly interested in a couple of things they discuss in their abstract, which says (emphasis mine): Abstract The...

One of the interesting things about this thread is having people that are familiar with models from other fields discuss these issues.

It might have looked like an essentially technical matter, but the Supreme Court's recent decision in R. v. Tatton, 2015 SCC 33 turns out to be full of interesting things to discuss.

Cantlon v. Folk - Klein, 2016 BCSC 868 is an interesting decision because it discusses, among other things, barring review of a child support obligation until a future date.

What is nice about the points made at the talk and in the paper is that one need not be nice / civil for the sake of being nice (although that is a good thing)-- instead, it is usually in your client's interest for you to be civil and the paper discusses a number of tactical tools that can be deployed.

I am really looking forward to this topic, and I'm excited to see more substantive and interesting things discussed after a few months of really low - level disappointment during the election.

Thank the hiring manager for their time, refer to a few things discussed during the interview, reaffirm your interest in contributing to the growth of the company, and leave it at that.

If you are interested in a value - driven resume that compellingly presents true leadership qualities, a focus on measurable results and a proven record of «making things happen,» it would be worth contacting me to discuss how a new executive resume can transform your overall personal and professional footprint.

Ryan and Louis discuss the direction of interest rates and inflation, the reluctance of the Fed to recognize the inflation threat, the impact of foreign countries raising their interest rates to combat inflation; the Fed's Vice Chairman Janis Yellen's view that inflation and the rise of commodities won't impact the «recovery», blaming rising global demand and disruptions of supply, not the easy money policy of the Fed; encouraging consumer confidence so they borrow more money to buy things they don't need to stimulate the economy, loan officer compensation, banks» use of Fed loans and banks» preference of trading operations over mortgage lending; credit squeeze; increased lending standards; the advantage of getting a low interest loan now before interest rates and inflation rates rise; the problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; the Democrats, Republicans and President avoid a government shutdown and what might have happened if it did; the $ 10 ′ s of billions of dollars saved in light of a $ 1.3 trillion defecit; the disconnect between buyers and sellers article in the Chicago Tribune; the HomeGain first quarter 2011 home values survey; the value of a quality Realtor in buying and selling a home; the HomeGain FSBO vs. REALTOR survey

I'm going to be in Toronto for a few hours one day over the next couple of weeks; if you are going to be in town, why don't we sit down over a coffee and discuss things; could be interesting.

He discusses the Art of Work (doing work you love) and living a Portfolio Life («jack of all trades and a master of some» — having lots of interests and becoming an expert in the things you love doing).