Sentences with phrase «discussing things we would do»

My husband and I were discussing things we would do differently if we could have a «do over» with our first year of parenting.

We discuss the things we'd do from morning to night to support our health and wellbeing.

We share our ultimate day by discussing the things we'd do from morning to night to support our health and wellbeing.

We've discussed the things they've done and felt, their regrets, anxieties, frustrations, and fears, as well as their hopes, successes, failures, losses, and illnesses.

Not exact matches

We let him breathe and do his own thing; we discuss certain things — the black and gold uniforms had his input — but it's not about making someone do something for your brand.

Getting value out of meetings should be the main priority, don't have meetings for things you can quickly discuss over phone or email.

Once a month we have a conference call with a key group of franchisees to discuss things we're doing right and areas that need improvement.

Little says problem - solving with Lego helps kinetic thinkers who have difficulties expressing their thoughts through speech or writing, and provides a safe way for workers to share things they don't normally want to discuss.

Because you don't want this gathering of your team to be a total waste of time, end the current conversation as quickly (but sensitively) as possible, and then ask your team members to take a couple of minutes to think about those pressing things they would like to discuss further.

As many analysts have noted, the major issue in «Three Billboards» (and this requires some spoilers to discuss) is whether Dixon is redeemed by doing what amounts to a good thing near the movie's end.

One thing we haven't heard anyone discuss yet: Donald Trump's supposed animus for CNN, the Time Warner - owned cable news network he swears he doesn't watch but frequently complains about.

In this blog, I will discuss my portfolio and I will post about various things that have to do with the stock market.

--------- I did not realize that someone had to be a theologian to discuss and argue Bible things??

Fishon said: «I did not realize that someone had to be a theologian to discuss and argue Bible things??

I don't practice religion, but have no problem someone expressing how they interpret the things that I experience and discuss with them.

I think it's great that we can and do discuss things that most people wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole.

You may one day be surprised to learn that there is a universe of things to believe in and discuss — none of which have anything to do with religion or god.

Well, if you don't have a direct uninteruppted pipeline to the Creator yourself, regular audiences and such to discuss things, then it is kind of pointless to say this is or isn't God's will.

Christians do not then force others to believe anything, but rather go to their homes as Jesus commanded his genuine disciples to do, seeking to discuss, reason and hopefully teach them about our Creator, Jehovah God and his kingdom, for Jesus said just before he ascended to heaven: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations... teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you.»

The show ended in good humour with Darren replying: «That is possibly the nicest thing anyone's ever said to me on this programme and I don't imagine I'll be able to take you up on it for the reasons we've discussed but I appreciate the sentiment.»

I have with in the past year had my name is removed.One thing in Catholic circles, we don't do this, We don't have discussions (OP) about other people's faith and discuss what they do wrong.

I have it on good authority he said «My wife... is such a comedian, always cracking up the apostles with her naughty jokes... Like did you hear the one she told about the Priest the Rabbi and the Pastor who were discussing how they apporting their collections and the Priest says «We go into the parking lot and draw a circle on the ground and throw all the money up and any that lands in the circle we give to God» and the Pastor says «Yeah, we do almost the same thing but give God anything that falls outside the circle» and the Rabbi looks at them both and says «We do almost the same thing to, draw a circle and throw up the money high into the air and God keeps what God wants...»

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

I think Muslim community is in deep trouble for it's backwardness and poverty while we see nothing is being done to resolve that... do we no have any other more important things to discuss than Birthdays or which foot first or this or that?

I don't expect you to be perfect but I do hope on a site that is satirical and about the kind of issues discussed here I would hope to have some empathy and support when struggling and be able to have some fun and for you to own it when you get things wrong.

As former military and private military, I've seen and done things I don't discuss in decent company.

Take them one at a time, spending as much time as you need to discuss thoroughly the issues and feelings that arise: «The ideas and issues which excite me most are...;» «The things that are most worth living for right now are...;» «I feel the most joy (pain, hope, lonely, together) when...;» «What I really believe about God is...;» «I feel closest to (most distant from) God when...;» «I get spiritually high when...;» «The beliefs that mean the most to me now are...;» «The beliefs from my childhood which no longer make sense are...;» «Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like to..

Anyway, we need not spend any time discussing things that don't exist — the universe has real problems, that thoughtful people will want to solve.

But I do agree with judging ideas / theologies and concepts — since these are things people adopt and they can be discussed to help make a better society — but no shot at the person has to be done in those discussions (since it against no one person).

The only thing that would put us in «good standing» with the ex-gay and similar folk would be to admit we are gay and always will be («reparative» therapy doesn't work and denial ends in repression taking the form of promiscuity), and most of us aren't called to celibacy (in the only Biblical sense of the term, as Jesus makes reference to and Paul discusses at length).

Father Driscoll discussed the shocking cost of shipping from Florida, and expounded on coconut palms, and fishtail palms, and tiger palms, and many other species of palms, and noted that as far as he could tell from his inquiries, Our Blessed Lord rode His donkey over the fronds of date palms, which is why our parish makes a strenuous effort every year to obtain date palms, for historical accuracy, but inasmuch as this year the cost of date palm fronds was prohibitively high, he was sure that the ladies would agree with him that the correct thing to do was to use local willow wands instead, and thus save money that could be directed to the poor and unfortunate of the parish.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

If you did know the most basic thing you would not contrast Calvin's depravity with the saint / sinner paradigm, as we just discussed.

Gradually they began to spend more of the sessions discussing positive goals including things they «had always wanted to do.»

In a recent interview with the Washington Post (part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced in my life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I had.

While it may be fun for bloggers and critics to discuss these things, our hope was that couples would instead be the ones having these conversations to build their marriages in ways that don't pressure, abuse or use one another.

A little later my dad came in and sat down on the edge of the bed and said quietly that we should have a conversation about Sunday Mass, and probably I was now old enough to make my own decisions about attending Mass, that he and my mother did not think it right or fair to force that decision on us children, that we needed to find our own ways spiritually, and that while he and our mother very much hoped that we would walk in the many rewarding paths of the Church, the final decision there would be ours alone, each obeying his own conscience; that was only right and fair, and to decree attendance now would perhaps actually force us away from the very thing that he and my mother found to be the most nutritious spiritual food; so perhaps you and I and your mother can sit and discuss this later this afternoon, he said, and come to some amicable agreement.

You might have to do some studying but Hebrews 1 explains it real clear DO YOUR HOME WORK BEFORE YOU REPLY THANKS AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU ARE ON FACEBOOK I ENJOY DISCUSSING THIS TYPE OF THIdo some studying but Hebrews 1 explains it real clear DO YOUR HOME WORK BEFORE YOU REPLY THANKS AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU ARE ON FACEBOOK I ENJOY DISCUSSING THIS TYPE OF THIDO YOUR HOME WORK BEFORE YOU REPLY THANKS AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU ARE ON FACEBOOK I ENJOY DISCUSSING THIS TYPE OF THING

Sorry — it's late here, I've been up since 4:15 and I just drove all the way across the state after a full day of work so to take care of my nine mile long wedding to - do list (no really, the thing is comically long)-- my sense of propriety and decorum for discussing dead animals along side a epically delicious pancake has gone completely out the window.

In an interview with Sports Illustrated's Pete Thamel and Thayer Evans, Brady Hoke discussed his hopes to land a «power 5» job next year, what he meant when he said Jim Harbaugh should not have punted on 4th and 2, and things he could have done better during his tenure in Ann Arbor.

Nor did they notice that announcers had been discussing Coric's semi-shocking upset of fellow next - big - thing Zverev days earlier.

So on Saturday this weekend, the FIA has put together a meeting with F1 technical chiefs to discuss what can be done to fix things in the short term.

But if all sports media companies do this, wouldn't it be common to use the largest company as an example (or complaint) when discussing things like this?

The BBWAA did try to change things, forming a committee to discuss vote expansion, but there are suspicions that it went nowhere because keeping things at 10 is a «subtle» way of making sure writers have an easy excuse for leaving off the likes of Bonds and Clemens.

Honestly selling my season ticket, I will set my foot at the emirates once wenger leaves!Woe unto you wenger sheep who will be flocking the emirates to cheer for top4 trophy.I refuse midiocrity all my life, how many times have I called for a revolution at arsenal here and it starts with you!Again bye bye justArsenal I got better things to do than discuss wenger club

The applicant puts on tape and then discusses how he'd do things differently.

There are very few people on here who really try to discuss some football, the worst thing is that they do nt even try to discuss how their rumored players would fit, just excitement.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

i'd be much more interested in discussing things on the merits, but you seem incapable of doing that, and resort to the same refrains, over and over and over.

If Nainggolan did have aspirations of moving to Chelsea this summer, the last thing he would be doing is publicly discussing Roma's hopes for next season, as ultimately it sounds as though he's committed to the cause and ready to help take them to the next level.