Sentences with phrase «discussion about a point»

Heard a lot of discussion about these points on a couple other sites from several indie authors.

Not exact matches

On the outline, the chapter will include all the discussion and explanation you need for that point, divided into subpoints and stories you want to make about that specific point.

It's a hot topic and a frequent point of discussion among investors, entrepreneurs and stock traders, so you should want to know all about it.

The point to remember is that the public policy discussion we are having now is about fairness.

What it's about: «Sargeant York» may have been about World War I — a sharpshooter becomes an unexpected hero after attacking and capturing a German position using the same strategy as turkey hunting — but the American - proud movie became a point of major discussion in the United States over the merits of entering World War II.

During a panel discussion as part of the South by Southwest Festival's interactive program, Denton admitted that the Hogan story — which was about a sex tape that the wrestler made with a friend's ex-wife, and included a short clip from the tape — didn't have an obvious point to it, apart from embarrassing Hogan.

At another point, he was asked about the Cambridge University Psychometrics Centre — which he said had initially been involved in discussions between him and SCL to be part of the project but fell out of the arrangement.

Trump's tweet came hours after his top economic adviser Larry Kudlow told reporters the US is «in the pre-preliminary stages of any discussions» with TPP countries about rejoining the pact, and that the prospect of reentry was more a «thought» than a «policy» at this point.

A whole discussion can be had about the effect of the Bitcoin network and value on the interest and price of alternative cryptocurrencies, but the point is that for the purpose of privacy it can be relatively easy and cheap to move into Monero and back out in Bitcoin, or at some exchanges, directly into cash.

The findings point up the importance of family discussions about money.

A discussion on Twitter about the Lightning Network's first wallet on the mainnet points at more advancements on the way.

There has been a lot of discussion about shopping using voice assistants through smart speakers, but fewer data points related to mobile have been reported.

«There never has been a substantive discussion about whether the points I'm raising are valid or not valid,» he said.

Jay introduces the guests for the program, gives updated information on the sponsors and talks about some of the discussion points for the day's program.

The on - going discussion about RIM's governance misses the point.

Other than DACA, other notable immigration discussions have involved talks about «chain» migration (family based migration), refugees, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), diversity visas, and the RAISE Act was introduced about a year ago by two senators, which would limit legal immigration and include a points system.

tallulah: Talking to someone on their death bed about eternal life is a most important discussion point.

At such a critical point in a persons's life I would hope that there would be some discussion about whether their soul is right with God before they die.

When in the 1970s there began to be much discussion about «mediating structures» and voluntarism, when Ronald Reagan urged us to rely on government less and on ourselves more, when George Bush talked about a «thousand points of light,» those of a statist mind - set groused that it was all a scheme to cut back on government social services.

The point about trading (even in corpses — which connects this discussion to the one we've been having about how to treat the newly dead) is even more profound and points, of course, to a conclusion about what a completely commercial, ruggedly libertarian society would really be like.

You and the rest blindly attacked the normal fallacies involved in any discussion about religion and fell head long into proving my point entirely.

I'm also going to add this; in earlier comments you raised some legitimate points for discussion about how the British Mandate was apportioned, which is a huge part of the whole quagmire and the legality of it all is a huge, tangled, convoluted mess.

Whenever a discussion of alcohol comes up among members of my congregation, and someone mentions the story about Jesus turning water into wine for his first public miracle, one point is inevitably made: that the wine back then was watered down so much it had little or no alcoholic content, making it barely more than grape juice.

We were having a splendid discussion about her new project, when I revealed my lack of sophistication by asking the utterly un-artistic question: «What's the point?»

while I'd be glad to enter into a discussion about that (considering the early church reject Tatian's Diatesseron — which offered a «harmony» of the gospels into one account), it misses the more foundational point.

Again, like last week in the discussion about the Breastplate of Righteousness, I have a little pneumonic device, an acrostic of sorts, to help you remember these points.

In this line of thought it is worth pointing out that Discussion about mission has raised a question about the very nature of the church.

During the discussion I made some points about how a Sixties - inspired deconstruction of middle - class manners and morals contributes significantly to the disorientation and dysfunction of today's working class.

Whether in private conversation, group discussion, a sermon or a speech, or in the interaction within the community, the question is whether there is, on the one side, conviction about what the gospel means and, on the other side, unqualified readiness to hear the other people and see the world from their point of view.

My point was that when students are learning about evolution, other theories should be brought into that discussion.

«In any group of young people there will probably be people who will at some point experience gender dysphoria so a respectful and caring discussion could make all the difference in terms of them feeling accepted, and could help them open up about how they feel,» he says.

This point about freedom is a standard ingredient in Whiteheadian discussions of the problem of evil.

But before we come to that discussion, it will be useful for us to turn our attention to the question of «resurrection» — first, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, about which so much of the earliest Christian writing found in the New Testament, and so much of the Christian experience of discipleship, turns; and second, to consider the point of the continuing Christian affirmation that those who have responded to the event of Christ are themselves made «sharers in Christ's resurrection».

If you're going to be deliberatly obtuse about the discussion, then there's no point in having it is there?

Understandably, emotions run high in discussions about gun control, in part because it's a horrifying subject — we're talking while parents are mourning their dead children, a reality we can't forget at any point.

The council itself said little about justification, but it set a mood that made discussion of this old point of division inevitable.

Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 231) The only point that needs to be made about these comments for the purposes of the present discussion is that the consequent nature of God has a functional role in Whitehead's metaphysical system.

I think that students often take their cues from the adults in leadership, so by pointing back to the student rather than the unbelieving parent, it can help keep the discussion from turning into one about something that may be confusing and upsetting for the child, but is instead an encouragement to them.

Yes, at some point we all have to have a discussion with ourselves and pretend there's a higher force that gives two figs about a bunch of silly, poorly evolved hominids.

To say this is to anticipate what will be said a little later about the Christian «story,» but the point is of the greatest importance at this stage of our discussion.

Mike i have been thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i think we will get into a good debate / discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they change as we learn and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it with unbelievers.brentnz

Moreover, choosing ideas which we also affirm may actually obscure the real point under discussion — that everything the Bible says about God is historical understanding.

Every discussion about the «point of contact», about the historical and supra - historical elements in Christianity, about apotheosis and incarnation, has always revolved around this relation between Christianity and classical humanism.

Ultimately, the whole discussion about the ordo salutis in Romans 8 leads the student of Scripture in the wrong direction about Paul's point.

I have nevertheless tried to discern here, by tacking back and forth between them and noting certain revealing points of intersection, the shape of the conversation that provides the current context for discussion about religion and higher education.

We did end up having a discussion about different faiths - expressing nor endorsing opinions on any in particular but merely educating the students on the differences (and then they pointed out the lack of difference between many).

It seems that the main point of David's cartoon is being missed in all this discussion about transformation.

Both of them are now believers, which is their choice as adults, but they fully understand my position on religions and we sometimes have some wonderful discussions on the subject, but I usually just get them confused because I know so much more about the Christian faith than they do because I have studied it from a secular point of view.

It can easily miss the point, therefore, if its sessions are convened to develop a specific «right» response to a particular moral question, as discussions about moral issues usually are.

In a pluralistic society such as ours, therefore, finding a common consensus of desirable qualities necessary in human society as a beginning point for discussion about the role the media play in contributing to, or detracting from such shared qualities, is awfully elusive.