Sentences with phrase «discussion about important»

Opening the floor for discussion about an important decision such as premarital couples counseling will set the tone for the way that you discuss important topics together in the future.

The aim of this is pointed, questioning us to spark discussion about important issues in a space that is at once dazzling, provocative, and — ultimately — overwhelmingly optimistic.

This piece addresses the responses to our work, and I hope it will continue to move the discussion about this important topic forward.

The Committee members will provide free information that will guide discussions about this important subject with family, friends and healthcare providers.

Teachers working with small groups of children would no doubt find this book useful in providing starting points for discussions about the important ethical issues surrounding evolution and genetic engineering.

Regularly updated with discussions about important cases shaping the law regarding the family.

In truth, there's nothing wrong with calm discussions about important issues.

Not exact matches

«There is nothing «unusual» about the National Security Advisor memorializing an important discussion for the record,» Ruemmler said in a statement.

«Even if the bills are not implemented, it creates a public discussion about discrimination, and that creates the idea that discrimination is important to religious freedom,» says Marieka Klawitter, a professor of public policy and governance at the University of Washington.

Marks introduces his memo with a really important discussion about what he sees as the common misconception about the definition of liquidity:

Having discussions about what childrens» aspirations are and how the family business can help them to achieve their goals is also important.

That's why a kind word, a quick discussion about family, an informal conversation to ask if an employee needs any help — those moments are much more important than group meetings or formal evaluations.

One prominent celebrity's story is an opportunity to prompt important discussions about being trans at work

30:42 — Jason says while gun control, office security, and mental illness are obvious relevant topics, there is an important discussion to be had about YouTube and others changing terms and monetization opportunities.

In August 2007, 22 members of the House of Representatives asked George Bush to back away from the SPP because of their concerns that it may undermine U.S. sovereignty and their strong objections about important discussions continuing «out of public view and without congressional oversight or approval» or the «proper transparency and accountability.»

During our discussion Monica asked me a number of questions (in addition to the questionnaire that assess your risk profile that Vanguard emails you before your call with a Vanguard Personal Advisor) not just about my finances and tolerance for risk, but about my life — what did I love to do, how often did I travel, what kind of lifestyle do I want to live in 5 and 10 years, and then finally the most important question — when would you like to retire?

Specifically, it demonstrated that Chris had not had a discussion about the most important factor for the client.

At ten years into the development of the angel capital industry, we are just starting to have the important discussions about how angel capital works, how we can best help entrepreneurs grow new companies and how we will contribute to the 21st century economy.

This is a really important discussion, and I also wonder a bit about how organisations can help support a healthy culture in the broader animal movement, particularly in relation to their interactions within it.

As I've written before, the difference in reactions «opens up a complicated discussion about who gets empathy in America, what issues are deemed important, and the types of activism and activists that the public responds to.»

It opens up a complicated discussion about who gets empathy in America, what issues are deemed important, and the types of activism and activists that the public responds to.

And most important, as Microsoft lived under government scrutiny, employees abandoned what had been nascent internal discussions about crushing a young, emerging competitor — Google.

the only important thing in life is how we treat one an other, how we live our lives, dipping into religous orthodoxy and entering a discussion about what god to pray to is nothing more then selfindulgent hokus pocus guesswork.

tallulah: Talking to someone on their death bed about eternal life is a most important discussion point.

In class, we had discussions about election and predestination, open theism, inerrancy and inspiration of Scripture, millennialism, tribulationalism, dispensationalism, infra -, supra -, and sublapsarianism and many other «very important» subjects that you discuss every day over dinner.

If «believers» aligned their right beliefs with right practice, fewer church members would look elsewhere for critically important discussions about caring, inclusiveness, open dialogue, ethical decision - making, and shared doubts in the context of a disturbing contemporary polarized culture.

What I think is equally important as the discussion of abuse should be the recognition and discussion about the completely ingrained misogyny within Christina Culture that is often a help maid to those committing this abuse.

Robert Sirico at Villanova University for a moderated discussion that will engage in important questions about free societies and human flourishing, and the economic structures that facilitate a virtuous society.

The principal critics of practical theology therefore advocate a radical rejection of modern questions about reason and practice in favor of a discussion in which the most important questions about the meaning and validity of the Christian message are assumed, precisely so that the details can be intelligently debated.

The answer, I think, is to be found in another important volume about communism: The Passing of an Illusion: The Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century, by François Furet (see the discussion by Brian C. Anderson elsewhere in this issue).

Offering some advice on what the Church could do better, Erik says, «It's important for us to have a discussion about it so we can have a healthier view, because we don't talk about it as a Church anymore.»

His reservations about dialogue suggest an approach that is essential to the kind of individual intellectual and ethical discussion that is important to me.

Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.

As we await the results of the Holy See's talks with the Society of St. Pius X, a prominent Catholic priest has issued an important statement about Vatican II, which is at the center of the discussions.

There is an important and ongoing discussion within the church about the issue of gay marriage and gay rights, and there is certainly room for theological disagreement.

He said that the discussion that follows tends to involve students «talking about how important Jesus is to them, and they defend why they won't step on it.

We can and should debate theology and doctrine, but we must never think that we are the infallible interpreters of Scripture and determiners of people's destiny, and should also remember that doctrine, as important as it is, becomes evil when debates and discussions about theology keep us from living out the loving gospel in tangible ways to a hurting and dying world.

We always began our discussion with a very simple line: «I'm going to tell you what I believe about this, but I could be wrong...» It's important to do that.

After last week's discussion about the future of Protestantism at Biola, there are a number of important practical questions which remain unanswered.

Perhaps by doing so we can help bring about some reframing of the public discussion so as to focus on the truly important issues of our day.

But, as with the discussion of Romans 7, it is important to know what Paul means when he writes about «the flesh» in his letters.

The foreign debt continues to be an issue and new voices have began to sound the need to look for ways to face it; (ii) At the national level two questions are concentrating increasing attention: one is the reassessment of the necessary role of the state to correct the distortions of a runaway market (currently discussed in Europe and in the discussions about the role the initiatives of «an active state has played in the economic development of Asian countries); the other is the need for a «participative democracy over against a purely representative formal democracy: in this sense the need to strengthen civil society with its intermediate organizations becomes an important concern; (iii) the struggle for collective and personal identity in a society in which forced immigration, dehumanizing conditions in urban marginal situations, and foreign cultural aggression and massification in many forms produce a degrading type of poverty where communal, family and personal identity are eroded and even destroyed.

There is an important theoretical discussion to be had about the Constitution and the application of the Second Amendment in our country today.

Last year's record - setting Women's March — filling Washington D.C. and hundreds of other cities with streams of pink hats and feminist placards — launched an important discussion about the place of pro-life and conservative women in the movement, after multiple women's groups opposing abortion were barred from officially participating.

The story is a tragedy, and should lead to many important discussions about gun violence, public safety and how Christians should address moments of such unspeakable violence and pain.

Finally, our literature review yielded important morals about formal features of discussions about what makes theological education theological.

Which is why it is important that the discussion that Steve Chalke has initiated about the Bible should continue and not just resort into the kind of polemic one sadly sees all too often on message boards and comments columns.

From the discussion above, I would suggest that the move toward thinking about unity in terms of fellowship or communion in the gospel within which there are nonetheless differences is very congenial to the Reformed spirit I have earlier described, where a sense of unity in diversity has been important.

Incidentally, Scot McKnight has written a post about the gospel on his blog today, noting that «there is a vibrant and viral discussion about gospel that is shedding light and leading us forward in profoundly important ways.»

The reason is clear: the discussion about existence as a perfection, as if that were all that is involved, does not make explicit the far more important point that, in the case of «God,» properly understood, nonexistence was never a real possibility, a consideration entirely overlooked by those who blithely say that, of course, we all know that no existence can be derived from «mere» ideas.