While not a substantial literary read, it is enjoyable and would provide good
discussion about life choices, honesty, forgiveness, and second chances.
Not exact matches
Jenkins goes on to mention his intention to participate in this year's March for
Life and to announce the formation of the «Task Force on Supporting the
Choice for
Life», which, with faculty support, will sponsor «serious and specific
discussion»
about pro-
life concerns.
But if we scrutinize and examine our
choices, our priorities, the pros and cons, and we come away truly feeling like we can feel good
about the decisions reached (or at the very least
live with them), that burden of need someone else to approve of it is lifted somewhat, and it seems to me it frees us up for
discussion the facts.
It prompted a nice
discussion on the drive home
about the generational gaps between these two couples, the hipster stereotype, the push back couples face when they choose not to have a child, social media, making unethical
choices to advance your career, and the idea that we
live in a world where we expect to have everything at our finger tips.
The overarching goal of our framework for K - 12 science education is to ensure that by the end of 12th grade, all students have some appreciation of the beauty and wonder of science; possess sufficient knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public
discussions on related issues; are careful consumers of scientific and technological information related to their everyday
lives; are able to continue to learn
about science outside school; and have the skills to enter careers of their
choice, including (but not limited to) careers in science, engineering, and technology.
The overarching goal of the Framework for K - 12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (National Research Council, 2012, Summary, para. 2) is to «ensure that by the end of 12th grade all students have some appreciation of the beauty and wonder of science; possess sufficient knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public
discussions on related issues; are careful consumers of scientific and technological information related to their everyday
lives; are able to continue to learn
about science outside school; and have the skills to enter careers of their
choice, including (but not limited to) careers in science, engineering, and technology (p. 1).»
Tip: This is a great book club
choice, likely to provoke a lot of
discussion about regret, redemption, and how
life is impacted by small decisions and actions.
Read on for a message from our Executive Director, and to learn more
about what we have planned this year in honor of our 25th anniversary — including a new online
Choices for Sustainable
Living discussion course, beginning May 9th.
Professor Wilkinson noted, «Our theme for the spring classes is Sustainability, so we are using the NWEI
Choices for Sustainable
Living readings in our freshman English seminar course... The students seem very excited about the ideas presented, and are eager to engage in discussion of the readings, as well as on - campus activities to promote sustainable l
Living readings in our freshman English seminar course... The students seem very excited
about the ideas presented, and are eager to engage in
discussion of the readings, as well as on - campus activities to promote sustainable
livingliving.
We recently learned that students at Fukuoka Women's University in Japan recently participated in NWEI's
Choices for Sustainable
Living discussion course as part of an «Exploring Sustainable
Living» program (which included a study trip to Australia to learn
about sustainable applications underway in other countries).