Predictably, he does not approach any aspect of
the discussion about religious belief in a balanced way.
Not exact matches
It doesn't matter if you are:
religious, homosexual, skin colour, political alignment, etc. everyone is welcome to voice their ideas and nobody has been killed for their
beliefs or background, though there have been some serious heated
discussions about Bitcoin and altcoins or the regulatory or non-regulatory stance.
Having an academic
discussion about religious views and theological
beliefs is fine enough, but there is certainly no reason to go into a
discussion of who is right an wrong because frankly, you do not know.
«The secretary of state acknowledges that clauses 2.43 and 2.44 of the Funding Agreement, and clauses 23E and 23G above do not prevent
discussion of
beliefs about the origins of the Earth and living things, such as creationism, in
Religious Education, as long as it is not presented as a valid alternative to established scientific theory.»
I am not talking here
about the limiting
beliefs of
religious or political dogma, which for so long have shackled humanity into fear, guilt and disempowerment, and could have their own long
discussion.