It includes posts, pics,
discussion about the readers and their hikes.
Reginald Hudlin sits down with CBR's Joseph Illidge for a lengthy
discussion about reader expectations, «Django Unchained» and more.
It includes posts, pics,
discussion about the readers and their hikes.
It includes posts, pics,
discussion about the readers and their hikes.
Not exact matches
Today, I was having a
discussion with a close friend
about the fact that very few people view individual stocks for what they are - proportional ownership in a business that must be evaluated on an enterprise - level to determine their relative attractiveness - and thought that allowing my
readers to be a «fly on the wall» would provide some insight into the methodology Ben Graham made so famous.
I would say to any person commenting on your 10 Ways the Non-Violent Atonement Changes Your Theology blog, to read your book first (its not an expensive purchase) before launching into any detailed
discussion or disagreement.It answers many of the potential concerns people have and gets the
reader to reflect very strongly on what they have been taught
about the atonement and to put on a new set of glasses when reading scripture.
It does not present one monolithic opinion or program, but is itself a
discussion and debate
about Hopewell's proposal, a debate the
reader is invited to join.
Wilson's prose captures both the strangeness and the poignancy of the marriage, but there are aspects of his
discussion about which a
reader should be warned.
A footnote refers the
reader to Romans 1:26 - 28, but there is no indication of scholarly
discussion among Scripture experts as to what precisely Paul is saying
about the relationship between homosexuality and unbelief.
Feigning a
discussion about objective vs. subjective morality without qualifying values in the example in an attempt to get the casual
reader to focus on the value the crafty writer wants you to adopt a an absolute truth — in this case how bad it would be to BBQ your grandmother, so that he can claim the the
reader believes in objective «truths».
About midway through last year, it suddenly dawned on me that it's not my job to generated seven days of content for
readers all on my own, but that, in addition to posting my own thoughts, I can use my blogging platform to feature news stories, links, interviews,
discussions, guest posts, and videos that would be of interest to you!
His principal contribution in The Lesser Evil is his insistence that moral reflection should be at the center of the
discussion about how to confront terror, but
readers should not regard this as the last word in that
discussion.
The reason I am putting this up for
discussion is because it was highly praised by one of our regular contributors (stand up Ken 1945 and I agree it is a very thought provoking article, and Ken was keen to hear what our
readers thought
about it.
Our goal is to provide our
readers with excellent content
about the team and the NBA from a variety of perspectives, as well as to provide the best forum around for intelligent
discussion of the Wolves, basketball, and life.
Regular
readers will have been following our ongoing
discussion around the new range of controversial swimsuits that have, in the estimation of just
about all concerned, blown swimming records out of the water in the last 18 months.
Don't really want to get involved in a
discussion about the site in the recruiting thread, but I would think / hope that the above comment would really strike a chord with long - time
readers of the site.
Inspired by a
discussion amongst the writers on Eco Child's Play
about our births and the safety of home births in particular, we decided to share our labor experiences with our
readers.
OK, so this is sorta out of left field, but remember way back when we had the
discussion about going vegetarian («Tentative Forays into a Meat - Free Life» and «TLT
Reader Thoughts on Going Vegetarian»)?
If you haven't yet «liked» the page, you're missing out on some great
reader discussion (in fact, posts with zero comments on the main blog are often getting talked
about quite a bit on Facebook) along with the grand unveiling of the new USDA MyPlate icon (replacing the old Food Pyramid); a distressing graphic of what the White House garden would look like if it were the recipient of current farm subsidies (hint: hope you like corn); a great Father's Day gift idea for dads who cook; news of an exhibit of vintage government food posters; an egg salad recipe; and even a chance to win a coveted (not really) Lunch Tray fridge magnet!
Lunch Tray
readers come from all over the U.S. (and the world), so I don't want to get too deep into a Houston - specific issue, but then I realized that this correction could be a springboard for a bigger
discussion about the future of school food in America.
My feeling
about milk in schools, as shared by many TLT
readers (judging from this morning's
discussion on the Facebook page and in comments on the blog), is that milk does have a place on lunch trays, but not to the exclusion of other beverages like water (which, as it turns out, is not so easy to get into cafeterias) and plant - based milks for those who drink them.
Although I find that my experiences in Houston are a great springboard for
discussions of school food reform generally, only
about 1 / 9th of my
readers are from Houston — the remainder come from all over the U.S. and over 50 foreign countries.
Readers may have noted that I've been including links to
discussions about Nestle in the last few days, and some of you may have been wondering what the sudden uptick in Nestle - related stuff is all
about.
But in a post following her statement, Barbour acknowledges that there is «a clear need to have a
discussion about how to annotate the literature post publication,» and invites
readers to chime in.
One concern I have is that
readers, especially new
readers to PHD, will be confused
about the definition of a carb in these
discussions.
Nevertheless, I wanted to open a
discussion about consumer expectations and market reality because I hear many of the same complaints and questions from
readers, clients, friends, and family.
Coming back to yesterday's part 1
discussion about constructive criticism where you and us commenters basically said it's OK to offer constructive criticism in a workplace context: If this blog is part of your workplace, is it OK for your «colleagues» (
readers) to constructively criticize aspects of your outfits if it's your job to advise us on style matters?
There's been lots of
discussion happening on facebook
about it, and apparently it has struck a chord of inspiration with some of our favorite
readers.
One
reader named Tammy Molnar appreciated «How to Date Like a Grown - Up» for its candid
discussion of personal dating topics, adding, «The author clearly knows what she's talking
about.»
Fort Worth, TX
About Blog Theological Matters exists to serve the churches of the Southern Baptist Convention by Convening
readers for relevant
discussion affecting churches and church congregations, communicating practical information and resources, and catalyzing interaction between Southwestern and
readers, between individuals and God, and between the redeemed and the lost.
In recent times, and especially since «First Reformed» debuted at the Toronto Film Festival last fall, the writer / director has spoken
about his work in numerous interviews and
discussions, and his comments — which I encourage interested
readers to seek out — are invariably as stimulating and insightful as they are candid.
They also invited the world, literally, to be a part of the
discussions by hosting a seven - part series on Education Week's online commentary pages, explaining to
readers, «This isn't
about one more jar of snake oil.»
Blogs are written on all kinds of topics from A to Z.
Readers can usually leave comments, which lead to
discussions about the blog's content.
With all the
discussion about deeper learning, college - and career - ready standards, and the latest research on assessments, assignments, and instruction, it turns out that what many principals prescribe to chart a new course for meaningful literacy instruction is engaging
readers and fostering a love of reading from an early age.
Along the way, the guides are careful to walk the
reader through their explanations of Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) and a teacher's Mean Growth Percentile (MGP), impressing the
reader with
discussions and charts of confidence ranges and the need to be transparent
about the data.
< And in our preparatory column to last week's Issues on the Ether column for our #EtherIssue live
discussion, Bringing Tools of the Trade to Self - Publishing, we askwed our
readers to talk with us
about what tools entrepreneurial authors need most; to what degree those tools can be as much of a burden as a help if they slow down writers with steep learning curves; how well the commercial world seems to be responding so far to the needs of entrepreneurial authors; and what kind of results they're seeing from their own experiences and experiments with new tools.
To some extent, my alpha
reader is like that, in that we talk
about the world and characters from every perspective, but the
discussion is still more
about finding holes (what if this happened, can that happen, how does that work) than generic «that's so cool» observations.
In a blog
discussion about author platform,
reader Carol commented: «What challenges me is creating my brand.
In Iterate & Optimize, there is a lot of
discussion about re-titling and re-covering books, as well as rebranding by imprint and even author name, in order not to confuse
readers and also to invigorate sales of books that just aren't moving.
Some
discussion about the difference between beta
reader and editor (see above)... and the group is divided on the definition.
I like to give teases
about my book or start
discussion to help interest more
readers.
Instead, I expect this
discussion will be all
about whether a
reader can mount from Linux, run Linux, or can interpret TeX..
Join more than 20 million other
readers on Goodreads to discover great books and have
discussions about what you're reading.
We authors tend to think of ourselves as the least intimidating people on the planet, but
reader discussion about you and your work can easily be squashed if you're in the room.
There is another reason to ask your audience (and potential
readers) to contribute to the
discussion about your book cover — and yes I realise I am telling you this as I am
about to ask you for feedback on the cover options but this series is supposed to be an honest peek behind self - publishing so...
Kaufman spoke
about Copia's global expansion into Australia and Spain — and alluded to some big news that will hopefully be launched in time for next month's O'Reilly Media Tools of Change publishing event — as well the popular reception of the annotation feature that lets authors enter the
discussion and post commentary inside the pages of
readers» books, almost creating a «director's cut» out of books, much the way that JK Rowling has granted her fans insider access into the creation of the Harry Potter books by adding additional notes and comments on the series.
I had a long
discussion with a friend who's an aspiring author
about how to move the plot along and engage the
reader at every turn.
It should be well formulated in the sense that if the
reader opted to ignore the background part, he or she would nicely know one specific topic of
discussion, the claim
about the topic and the defending reasons why you chose the stated claims.
There will also be other
discussions where
readers can talk
about film adaptations, or TV adaptations or simply other TV Shows and Movies.
I can also say this with confidence: if my
readers get half as excited as I do engaging in
discussions about a story while it's still being written, then they will buy into the idea of the serialized novel.