But the flip side of
any discussion around cost is value.
Not exact matches
So whilst the closed door
discussions will be about how to keep the status quo regardless of the rapidly increasing power
costs and breakdown of service that is now being experienced
around the country, the open conversations being had by the people are excited
discussions about the future because we trust the likes of Elon Musk and Mike Cannon - Brookes to get the job done more than we trust big power and Government to come to any kind of meaningful and affordable long term solution.
The
discussion surrounding this market segment would be
around Access — how to get better access at a reasonable
cost.
Sources inside the company said that
discussion would happen, perhaps because social media lit up yesterday after Thiel told the New York Times that he had secretly launched an effort,
costing around $ 10 million, to find and help those interested in suing Gawker.
At a March 17, 2005, meeting, for instance, board member Bill Barnett exclaimed, «I think that it's high time for this district and the Board to have an in - depth
discussion around the implications and the associated
cost of increasing the number of instruction days.»
This paper provides an overview of recent trends in light - duty vehicle fuel economy
around the world, new projections, and a
discussion of fuel economy technology opportunities and
costs over the next 30 - 50 years - all in the context of recent IEA projections of global energy use (especially oil use) and CO2 emissions.
The
discussion revolved
around a serious subject — the high
costs of employee health care.
A majority of the
discussion online has been centered
around key characters, such as Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker, originally
costing 60,000 credits.
There's been a lot of skepticism about CCS here in past
discussions, mostly
around the
cost issue, and it seems well - founded in principle.
The next failure to compromise came in the fight over adding a «safety valve» provision to limit unanticipated high
costs from greenhouse gas restrictions, something Joe Romm and many others rejected out of hand at the time, even though Romm last year (
around minute 37 in this videotaped panel
discussion) noted the need for pragmatism to get things started: «The game changer for the world isn't between no price for carbon and a high price.
What bothered me most about the whole Proposition 23 media efforts was the lack of any meaningful dialogue on the uncertainties
around the technologies needed (and how much they the will
cost - as it's important from an opportunity
costs discussion) to meet the stated goals and what it means if the rest of the country doesn't follow a similar approach to addressing CO2 loads.
In discussing
costs and benefits in 2100, I and others routinely refer to future generations, and in a sense that's right, since the people involved in the
discussion won't be
around then.
«When you have Japan, [South] Korea and China having
discussions around a north Asian carbon club; when you've got China and Korea having
discussions around how do we treat emissions across borders and what's the lowest
cost to our economies to meet our emissions targets; when you have China and New Zealand having those conversations about establishing direct engagement because they both have a functioning carbon market with a price; those conversations and those emerging what's being called «carbon clubs» is something that Australia should be participating in,» he says.
Most
discussions between law departments and their internal clients usually revolve
around lowering
costs and headcount.