Sentences with phrase «discussion here»

I'd also (in a way) strongly second Steve Mosher's preference that we respect Gavin and Michael's plea «to open the discussion here to all of the authors to give their thoughts...» Only the authors should post comments (at least initially, and for some time after that), and the peanut gallery should watch.

Most of the discussion here is about the appropriateness of one of Annan & Hargreaves» choices for a prior, the Cauchy distribution.

I note that a lot of the discussion here has moved away from the subject of press releases, but it's been for the most part interesting and substantive, so I'm inclined to let it go on for a while longer before closing the comment form.

April 1, 12:17 a.m. Update below There's been vigorous discussion here and elsewhere (e.g., Climate Audit and Skeptical Science) of the methods and findings in «A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years,» a recent Science paper by Shaun A. Marcott, Jeremy D. Shakun, Peter U. Clark and Alan C. Mix.

It could make the discussion here even more interesting, since we're on the topics of economics and science.

I will be revisiting these comments to see if the discussion here can give me a few key points when bothering policy makers - a few key points without me doing a PhD first.

We criticized William Broad previously (Broadly Misleading) for a piece that misrepresented the scientific understanding of the factors that drive climate change over millions of years, systematically understating the scientifically - established role of greenhouse gases, and over-stating the role of natural factors including those as speculative as cosmic rays (see our recent discussion here).

I'm thinking you to could be part of the problem under discussion here.

«The discussion here is restricted to scientific topics and will not get involved in any political or economic implications of the science.»

I find the discussion here, especially the posted plot, quite misleading.

To wit: «The discussion here is restricted to scientific topics...»

This corresponds to a roughly 30 % apparent weakening in the so - called «Thermohaline Circulation» (see our previous discussion here).

In essence, the authors have revisited a question posed earlier in a paper by Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas (2003: see our previous discussion here), investigating whether or not evidence from past proxy records of temperature support the existence of past intervals of warmth with the widespread global scale of 20th century warming.

The discussion here is restricted to scientific topics...»

There's already been robust discussion here regarding the reliability of 10 - year, 17 - year and 30 - year spans.

Watch the video discussion here.

Requesting that the single image be removed, per discussion here [18].

One of the best - known accounts of an early Rauschenberg painting undergoing episodes of change involves Untitled [small black painting](1953, fig. 3), a work that belonged to John Cage (1912 — 1992) for more than thirty years and shares a number of similarities with the painting under discussion here.

Join the discussion here!

My situation and questions are written in my former discussion here.

Check out the website and feel free to begin discussion here or on our forums about this new title!

I'm going to end the discussion here.

That being said, the discussion here is about the interesting problem, which is what should someone do if they have a kickstarter and blow past their expectations by an order of magnitude or more?

Fire Emblem: Dark Dragon and Sword of Light, Gaiden, Mystery of the Emblem, Genealogy of the Holy War, Thracia 776, and the BS game are fit for discussion here.

The uncharted series is rated M, so it doesn't merit much discussion here, but this is likely going to be the biggest release for the PlayStation 4 by the time it is released next year no matter what comes out between now and then.

Join the discussion here!

its just a normal discussion here.

The first two are basically irrelevant in this discussion, since this is not a debate about each person's own tastes and preferences in gaming that's happening around SF0 and particularly its controls but more a debate about their relative quality to game controls in general and certainly relative to the whole shmup or on - rails - shooter genre — and, since I started this particular discussion here with my first post, I'm telling you it's not about personal opinions of the game; it's about analysing its merits more objectively that that.

... In fact, you make the same point here as you did in the other thread, as if wanting to move the discussion here.

It looks like some users really do contribute to the discussion here, like «pancake» who has has made several posts answering others» questions.

But ok, that's not up for discussion here.

Since not many of us earn the required status, that means most of us can't book first class awards... so we are leaving it out of the discussion here.

We've devoted quite a bit of discussion here on Milenomics to knowing when to stop earning miles, and how to use our miles.

«I think I'm a smart sports bettor, but I always lose,» said the TSN reporter to Kornegay at one point, obviating the need for a longer discussion here of how sports books in Las Vegas make their money.

Hi Dr, I found this site and find the information and discussion here very helpful.

You can ask your veterinarian for guidance, or if you want to figure it out yourself, you can view a video and discussion here.

nice discussion here on a couple unpleasant aberrations from Interactive Brokers.

I guess I've exhausted the topic on the blog posts, so we'll continue the discussion here if anyone wants to.

[0:37:11.5] GC: David, thanks so much for coming on the show and livening up our discussion here about credit cards and for sharing your expertise, thank you everybody out there for watching and until next week, be good with your money.

The discussion here is in reference to the publicly traded common stock, not the series A common stock.)

@Mark: We are talking around in circles and I'm going to stop the discussion here because it's becoming pointless.

Recent discussion here regarding real, real returns (returns net of inflation, taxes and fees) and the flawed BLS calculation on Owner's Equivalent Rent sparked a good discussion about the benefits of buying a home.

I think this discussion here really distills it down to the core issues.

Always happy to have a lively and open discussion here.

If you're curious about the math, you'll find a more complete discussion here.

I just wanted to clarify that (given the discussion here on annual fees).

We've covered the topic of estate taxes elsewhere on this site but it raises a discussion here as well.

It's an important topic, and one worthy of discussion here on The Retirement Manifesto.

Little details like PMI (private mortgage insurance), points, APR and bi-weekly mortgage payment options are all up for discussion here.

The discussion here deals with the main rules for calculating your primary insurance amount.