Not exact matches
We said at the time that we had discontinued contributions to several
public policy research groups whose position on climate change could divert attention from the important
discussion about how the world will secure the energy required for economic growth
in an environmentally responsible
manner.
The Louisiana bill calls for, «an environment within
public elementary and secondary schools that promotes critical thinking skills, logical analysis, and open and objective
discussion of scientific theories being studied including... global warming...» The bill also calls for «instructional materials to help students understand, analyze, critique, and review scientific theories
in an objective
manner.»
«We have discontinued contributions to several
public policy research groups whose position on climate change diverted attention from the important
discussion on how the world will secure the energy required for economic growth
in an environmentally responsible
manner.»
In 2007, Exxon pledged in its corporate responsibility report that it would no longer contribute «to several public policy research groups whose position on climate change could divert attention from the important discussion on how the world will secure the energy required for economic growth in an environmentally responsible manner.&raqu
In 2007, Exxon pledged
in its corporate responsibility report that it would no longer contribute «to several public policy research groups whose position on climate change could divert attention from the important discussion on how the world will secure the energy required for economic growth in an environmentally responsible manner.&raqu
in its corporate responsibility report that it would no longer contribute «to several
public policy research groups whose position on climate change could divert attention from the important
discussion on how the world will secure the energy required for economic growth
in an environmentally responsible manner.&raqu
in an environmentally responsible
manner.»
The Employer is using it
in a
manner which is intended or known to have the effect of soliciting confidential private information about bargaining unit members, and is to some extent having a
public discussion about what are private matters.
We would like the CCW process to emerge strengthened from these
discussions, resulting
in increased systemic controls on international armed conflicts embedded
in international law
in a
manner that does not widen the technology gap amongst states or encourage the use of lethal force to settle international disputes just because it affords the prospects of lesser casualties to one side or that its use can be shielded from the dictates of
public conscience.