[130][IV] He avoided explicit
discussion of human origins, but implied the significance of his work with the sentence; «Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history.»
Not exact matches
Generis: «For these reasons the Teaching Authority
of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state
of human sciences and sacred theology, research and
discussions, on the part
of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine
of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the
origin of the
human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics added].
Pope Pius XII declared that «the teaching authority
of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state
of human sciences and sacred theology, research and
discussions... take place with regard to the doctrine
of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the
origin of the
human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter --[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» (Pius XII, Humani Generis 36)»
In Kate's
discussion about Neandertals and our own history as a species on the planet, reminds me
of the
origin of the celiac disease issue which is, you know, very deeply tied with our
human history.
And while the
origins of modern
human behavior have been widely debated, there has been much less
discussion about the evolution
of modern
human anatomy.
It covers the scientific explanation for the
origin of the universe (with clips and teacher led
discussion) and the
origin of humans.
(1) A great deal
of the
discussion of this podcast (here, and elsewhere) seems to be coming from a sort
of contrarian triumphalist viewpoint, suggesting that Salby's unseen paper is going to disprove the anthropogenic
origin of the CO2 rise, and thus absolve
humans from any possible responsibility for GW.