Sentences with phrase «discussion of other ways»

Not exact matches

When a relationship hits a serious stage and couples get married or commit to each other in some big way, people are often too overcome with excitement or too overwhelmed by the prospect of spending forever with this person to have a deep discussion about where their priorities lie.

We spend hours doing that without realizing there could be a much better way to communicate with the help of A.I. routines, more focused discussions, online chat, and other systems designed to help us communicate more and sift less.

Since the rise of bitcoin over the past year, there has been a lot of discussion amongst the anti-government, pro-competing currencies crowd: is gold a better than investment than bitcoin or the other way around?

Angry explosions; owning a program and brooking no alternative decision making or discussion; almost masterful way of belittling others; constant vigilance for criticism measured in the breathtaking way they can respond to any perceived «challenge.»

Any way say, Man of God respectable Terry Jones, of Florida's Dove's Church, maybe a day would come that the world and Muslims would thank you for your causing all these discussions to come out today's on this site blogs and many other sites blogs and to it leading to have more people religious discussions leading them read and learn more about Islam and the Quran many who's eyes had opened to reality converted to Islam or at least respect Muslims and their religion.

This is right On Jeremy, when any kind of theology discussions starts I run the other way and just go make disciples, at least I am accomplishing something then.

Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of God even even when we do nt know or understand his laws.brentnz

Avoidance of the emotional side of the centuries - old discussion about faith and religion is the better way to reduce the noise and to understand the other side of the question.

By way of introduction, allow me to observe that we should not enter this discussion with the assumption that one or another of the churches has no problem while others do.

Bishop Paulose concludes this discussion, «In this way we respond to Marx's critique of religion that Christianity is not the opium of the people but a way of life in which the Christian participates in Jesus» «being there for others», for the total humanization of humanity.»

The questions about religion and public life, those calling for «public» discussion, no longer focus on the verifiability of religious speech but concern quite other issues: methods of understanding and describing the religious realities, old and new, that we see appearing around us; useful criteria for assessing these religions and for defining and comprehending this new set of powers in our public life; and ways of protecting vital religious groups from the excesses of the public reaction to them, and protecting the public from the excesses of powerful religious groups — hardly questions a secular culture had thought it would have to take seriously!

The question of whether those are valid comparisons became a hotly debated topic in our comments section, opening up a discussion about the ways the two cases might help shed light on one other.

We need to find practical ways of supporting each other in this process, perhaps talks, discussion and / or support groups.

After a couple has learned to use the 1MM, to satisfy their mutual heart hungers (deficiency needs), their understanding of what they need in order to continue to grow may be broadened in these ways: (1) Discussion in counseling, or in a group, of the various ways in which one's own marriage growth is enhanced by becoming a positive influence in the growth of others.

These comments suggest that Naess is personally open to entering ethical discussions in a relatively traditional way, If other deep ecologists follow him, the gap between them and Whiteheadians will narrow Meanwhile, however, this opening on the part of Naess can not be taken to characterize the movement as a whole.

When a question is raised which for most people demands careful thought and responsible personal decision, people like that will very often simply quote a passage from the Scriptures, frequently in no way directly relevant to the matter under discussion and when relevant only valuable in the context of another age and under other conditions than those which are ours today.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

I have suggested some of the ways this can be done: increasing the number of TV networks to six or even 12; diversifying the sources of production; increasing support of public broadcasting and community - supported stations; the use of telephone call - ins; follow - up programs with discussions; community - media projects; more use of cable, videocassettes and other less «mass» forms of the technology.

The foreign debt continues to be an issue and new voices have began to sound the need to look for ways to face it; (ii) At the national level two questions are concentrating increasing attention: one is the reassessment of the necessary role of the state to correct the distortions of a runaway market (currently discussed in Europe and in the discussions about the role the initiatives of «an active state has played in the economic development of Asian countries); the other is the need for a «participative democracy over against a purely representative formal democracy: in this sense the need to strengthen civil society with its intermediate organizations becomes an important concern; (iii) the struggle for collective and personal identity in a society in which forced immigration, dehumanizing conditions in urban marginal situations, and foreign cultural aggression and massification in many forms produce a degrading type of poverty where communal, family and personal identity are eroded and even destroyed.

Donald Bloesch, on the other hand, gives the Holy Spirit a more explicit discussion, seeing the theologians task as discovering not only «the intent of the author but also the way in which the Spirit uses this text to reveal the saving work of Jesus Christ.»

Of course there are many ways of reading Whitehead, and one can «read into his discussions» all of the other arguments, save the ontological one, if one wishes and as Hartshorne does — but only at the price of distortioOf course there are many ways of reading Whitehead, and one can «read into his discussions» all of the other arguments, save the ontological one, if one wishes and as Hartshorne does — but only at the price of distortioof reading Whitehead, and one can «read into his discussions» all of the other arguments, save the ontological one, if one wishes and as Hartshorne does — but only at the price of distortioof the other arguments, save the ontological one, if one wishes and as Hartshorne does — but only at the price of distortioof distortion.

Others, however, make a more conscious effort to let piety enter the teaching - learning process by way of «rabbit - chasing» — discussion of topics tangential to the main subject, and personal commentary.

In this way, the door was opened to discussion of their mutual need for more of each other and what they might do to recapture and perhaps even increase the closeness of their early years together.

But, however important and interesting such discussions may prove to be — and after all, black Christian life can be interpreted in a variety of ways of which none excludes the others — they amount to little more than whistling in the dark apart from a vibrant community of participants.

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

Hubby prefers the other way: clotted cream as a base for a big scoop of jam:D We had a lot of discussions about this:)-RRB-

Discussions are a brilliant way to understand other peoples points of view.

Please note the words «intelligent discussion» as I am now going to give some examples of other anti-Wenger comments that have been deleted, because they are so ridiculous that they can in no way be called part of any intelligent debate about Arsenal or football.

Until someone with proper expertise in myriad areas of sports science, football coaching, business, finance, law, PR, media, marketing, human resources etc etc has unfettered access to all board meeting minutes, records of all discussions with players, full player medical records, details of all contacts with agents, other clubs, other players, seen copies of player contracts and negotiations, understands the financial imperatives, interprets the business accounting, has reviewed the business plan, has knowledge of the employer / employee contractual relationship between Wenger and the club, has intimate insight in to the goals and objectives of the business and the club — then everyone is filling in the gaps with their own version of events and will necessarily always be a long, long way from anything close to any «truth».

Appreciate they are bare stats and there are discussions to be had etc and not suggesting any are better than others, but revealing in some ways nonetheless in terms of what we should realistically expect:

There has been much discussion over why the Gunners seem to suffer from more long term injuries than any other club in the Premier League, and there have been questions asked of our fitness regimes and and even Arsene Wenger's (or even England's) coaching methods, which teach players the Arsenal way from a very young age.

I spoke with several other students that I personally trained at the Honor Council's first ever Integrity Day about defining success in qualitative rather than quantitative ways, organized presentations for parents in the local community, wrote brochures explaining of the program for the teachers, and held discussions about how Challenge Success ties into Jewish values at my Hebrew School.

There were some common themes throughout the discussion which included self - acceptance (allowing ourselves to appreciate who we currently are) as well as being mindful of how our communication style greatly effects the way we get along with our significant others.

If you're reading this email, that's a great step, but there are many more ways to equip yourself as a dad: read up about fathering issues and challenges; ask an older dad whom you respect to meet you for lunch, and ask him lots of questions; take the initiative to organize regular meetings with other men that include discussions about fatherhood — like this dad did before his first child was born.

But instead my whole family wound up having a thought - provoking discussion about obesity, food allergies, the rights of parents to keep other parents from feeding their kids, the ways in which economically disadvantaged students might feel left out by the whole «birthday treat» custom, and more.

No activity or discussion at any Association meeting or other function may be engaged in for the purpose of bringing about any understanding or agreement among members that may violate or appear to violate the antitrust laws, including but not limited to raise, lower or stabilize prices; to regulate production; to allocate markets; to encourage boycotts; to foster unfair trade practices; to assist monopolization; or to in any way violate federal or state antitrust laws.

In the end, this one status update sparked a 22 - comment - long discussion thread involving six people (including me), none of whom except the two other Rice alumni were connected in any way other than through having known me at some point.

We want you to be part of the discussion at RootsCamp, engage other progressive organizers in meaningful ways, and gain new insights.

There's no place for it here and the discussion basically is we have the rights of 32,000 kids and we have the rights of the few for which this is a problem and if we can't find some other way of addressing it I don't think it should be addressed, Paladino said.

There was discussion of him having forced his way into the role of responder to Bush after Harry Reid had chosen the other Sen. Reed (from RI) by planning his own press conference.

Hayek and others believed that classical liberalism had failed because of crippling conceptual flaws and that the only way to diagnose and rectify them was to withdraw into an intensive discussion group of similarly minded intellectuals.

She declined to give a firm answer one way or the other, saying protocol prevents any public discussion of the matter.

Health insurance coverage is a complex issue that affects workers and their families in profound ways; it became clear that a mediator is needed to assist in a fair discussion of this and other important issues.

Crowds of family members, NASA officials, and other supporters have cleared out, the parking lot suddenly seemed much bigger, and rousing manifestos of exploration have given way to intense discussions of spectroscopy and engineering.

Key focus areas of the workshop will include: • Recognizing and understanding leadership in a science setting • Using negotiation as a tool in scientific discussions and problem solving • Identifying and resolving conflicts in the lab • Dealing with difficult people and situations in a scientific setting • Communicating your ideas and plans in a way that engages others • Leading productive scientific team and project meetings • Setting goals for and giving useful feedback to scientists • Creating a positive lab culture • Identifying, interviewing and hiring the best scientists for your team.

There's been a lot of discussion in recent years about how 24/7 connectivity and omnipresent devices are rewiring our brains and shortening our attention spans, decimating our ability to connect with the world, ourselves, and each other in a mindful way.

The main topic of discussion was how the social web has had a profound impact on the way we connect with each other.

The good thing about online dating and using those social networking sites and web cam messengers is that the two people having a date can have a phone / webcam patch conversation in which it is much easier for the two people to know each other and it provides a natural way of having a discussion.

There are plenty of ways to connect with other members including in - depth profiles, messages and emails and chat rooms for engaging in group discussions.

With or without the four letter expletive, the use of God's name in any way other than respect, reverence or thoughtful discussion is in vain.