This is an insightful piece and really adds to
the discussion on access to justice.
Not exact matches
«Juxtaposing the corruption that has recently been exposed
to our topic of
discussion today, brings so much
to deliberate
on because it is universally recognized that increased
access to justice depends
on public confidence in the
justice system.
During a panel
discussion last week at the Thomson Reuters Emerging Legal Technology Forum panel called Prometheus Unbound:
On «Chatbots» Robot Lawyers and Ongoing
Access to Justice, lawyers from a variety of backgrounds discussed the opportunities and applications for, and the growing popularity of, legal technology
to address pressing needs in the provision of legal services.
If we were
to draw
on their collective wisdom
to tackle the issues of
access to justice with a multi-disciplinary approach, not only would we enhance the
discussion, but we would also broaden the range of potential solutions
to issues identified.
We rarely have any
discussion here
on how costs prevents
access to justice unless one's client is indigent or very rich.
Of course you should — nobody would quibble with that — but how does stating the obvious help inform the
discussion — a
discussion which began with Mr. Kowalski's invitation
to OTLA
to elaborate
on its ardent anti-ABS stance and
to offer up alternative solutions
to the array of problems undermining
access to justice.
Based
on the results of the study, and much
discussion with the Washington bar, in 2012, the Washington Supreme Court adopted a new court rule
to improve
access to justice.
Recently, a
discussion about
access to justice solutions cropped up among lawyers
on the platform and our executive producer, Laurence Colletti, decided it was worth recreating the conversation in podcast form.
October 11, 2016 — There is a vibrant
discussion going
on in Canada about the role legal technology could and should play in closing the
access to justice gap.
October 19, 2016 — «Judges from along the Eastern seaboard convene at Fordham University School of Law Wednesday night for a
discussion on the intersection between civil and criminal
access to justice and how
to better handle the overlapping deficiencies in both systems.
Encouragement We do, however, welcome the opportunity for
discussion on this and all the other issues Jackson LJ has outlined in his lengthy paper, and we are encouraged by his reference
to the need for
access to justice.
While the LSI report focuses
on LSA 2007, it's that other piece of landmark legal services legislation — LASPO — that should provide the impetus for (one hopes) a new and much broader
discussion about the meaning of «
access to justice».