Sentences with phrase «discussion point at»

The results were a fantastic improvement on the old table mats and made for a great discussion point at the table.

So happy you wrote this post, not only about the marble (been quite a discussion point at our house lately!)

Discussion points at the Forum included Marie Cannon, Erie County Social Services Acting Commissioner and First Deputy Commissioner of Family Independence, stating the Department of Social Services» implementation of this past year's Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP).

For our Acer Chromebook C910, this SuperUser discussion pointed us at the location of the screw.

Most recently, prominent Bitcoin trader WhalePanda wrote in his Consensus NY event recap blog post that the legality of ICOs was one of the major discussion points at the event.

Not exact matches

He's careful to note that any discussion of Apple releasing an actual TV set remains «sort of conjectural at this point in time.

At another point, he was asked about the Cambridge University Psychometrics Centre — which he said had initially been involved in discussions between him and SCL to be part of the project but fell out of the arrangement.

Trump's tweet came hours after his top economic adviser Larry Kudlow told reporters the US is «in the pre-preliminary stages of any discussions» with TPP countries about rejoining the pact, and that the prospect of reentry was more a «thought» than a «policy» at this point.

I'm wondering from an economic point of view, when you look at the United States and your discussions with other people in business and in government, is his bark bigger than his bite?

This is not a discussion of whether Bitcoin is fraudulent or not, this comes down to a discussion of whether collectively as individuals at this point in history we want to put our faith in a currency backed by a centralized system or decentralized system.

A whole discussion can be had about the effect of the Bitcoin network and value on the interest and price of alternative cryptocurrencies, but the point is that for the purpose of privacy it can be relatively easy and cheap to move into Monero and back out in Bitcoin, or at some exchanges, directly into cash.

So this gets very technical of various points but I think it's important for people to hear because they can really quickly learn how real this stuff is at the start of our mastermind discussion.

A discussion on Twitter about the Lightning Network's first wallet on the mainnet points at more advancements on the way.

While the sabre rattling and economic boycotts are very visible actions, behind the scenes discussions between cooler heads will likely be what leads to a politically palitable resolution, if that is even possible at this point.

At the time of an IPO and subsequent underwritten public offerings, underwriters will have the ability to dictate whether investors are allowed to sell, which makes the registration rights negotiated at the time of the venture financing a mere starting point for discussions with the company and the underwriterAt the time of an IPO and subsequent underwritten public offerings, underwriters will have the ability to dictate whether investors are allowed to sell, which makes the registration rights negotiated at the time of the venture financing a mere starting point for discussions with the company and the underwriterat the time of the venture financing a mere starting point for discussions with the company and the underwriters.

Contrary to Buffet's opinion, Bill Gates acknowledged the value of cryptocurrencies and shared it in one of his discussions with Reddit users in January 2015, saying: «Digital currencies can help the poor, but not Bitcoin» pointing at two important Bitcoin drawbacks, namely its volatility and anonymity.

At such a critical point in a persons's life I would hope that there would be some discussion about whether their soul is right with God before they die.

One large diagram might be presented at an early point in the discussion of fossils.

I think we'll have to agree to disagree at this point though, because this is turning into quite an emotionally and mentally demanding discussion which I'm afraid I don't have the time or energy for right now.

But that whole discussion really does not speak to my point at all.

In the evening of the same day this sermon was the subject of a discussion in the B.B.C.'s program, «Meeting Point», in which I was questioned by some members of the morning congregation under the chairmanship of Canon W. E. Purcell, editor of this Dialogue, and at that time the Religious Broadcasting Organizer for the Midland Region of the B.B.C..

The discussion that follows draws on this article at a number of points.

At this point our discussion of the institutionalization and polity of a theological school in chapter 8 comes to bear on the discussion of a theological school's course of study in this chapter.

Burhoe's point is that if cultural evolution is the subject for discussion, then the religious traditions whose wisdom has survived millennia of selective pressures can be left out of the discussion only at the cost of scientific adequacy and competency.

[Editor's note: At this point in the discussion there was a long debate over the meaning of words, especially the meaning of «perception.»

Anyone who followed in the slightest the discussions before and at the Evanston Assembly of the World Council of Churches on the main theme «Christ — the Hope of the World» will recognize the disparities of judgment among Christians today at this point.

Sometimes it is hard to discern the systematic function of a particular passage, while at the same point one looks in vain for a discussion of other questions that are necessarily related to the overall structure of his enterprise.

But the acceptability of his characterization of these two «trends» is one of the points at issue in this discussion.

«In any group of young people there will probably be people who will at some point experience gender dysphoria so a respectful and caring discussion could make all the difference in terms of them feeling accepted, and could help them open up about how they feel,» he says.

Ellis's multilayered discussion circles around a few basic points and must be assessed on at least three different levels.

We may now add, in the light of the above discussion of the Chosen People, that the Christian claim becomes invalid at the point where it becomes exclusive.

Hence some aethiest stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Hence some believers stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

His discussion with secular existentialist philosophy would also be rendered superfluous, a point to which we shall return at a later stage.

@NL: Yes, that would be a good step, but I don't think we are at the point yet where people are ready to take on that discussion openly face - to - face.

Although Jewett chaired the committee which formulated Fuller's revised Statement of Faith and recognized the need to move the discussion concerning Biblical authority from the issue of inerrancy to that of interpretation, the argument in his book is inadequate at this very point.

Let us illustrate this point of view toward which our whole discussion has been moving by looking briefly at the sacraments of the Church, the Christian meeting of death, and the Christian life of active service as expressions of the way which is enclosed in the grace of this kind of community.

Understandably, emotions run high in discussions about gun control, in part because it's a horrifying subject — we're talking while parents are mourning their dead children, a reality we can't forget at any point.

I have conceded this point to you for the purpose of this discussion, simply to show that it doesn't matter, but I do not concede that point at all.

There is an interesting contrast that sometimes develops in relations between at least some men and some women, although the point under discussion does not depend on the stereotyping of either men or women.

So often, we see people in these discussions doing Scripture combat by throwing verses at those they disagree with, and if that was not your intent, then that is the point at which I misread you.

Yes, at some point we all have to have a discussion with ourselves and pretend there's a higher force that gives two figs about a bunch of silly, poorly evolved hominids.

Such discussion and contracting, both written and spoken, would also need to include provisions for reevaluating and recontracting at various points in the relationship and to plan for how and when to do it.

A discussion of evil is essential at this point in our discussion.

At other points in this discussion we have spoken of the «story» or the «drama» in which Paul thinks of Christ as playing a part.

I don't see the point of Pascal's entire discussion if there is no pay off for believing, or at least pretending to.

Héring, to whom I have been indebted at several points in this discussion, concludes his study of the appearances in the Synoptic Gospels of the phrase «Son of Man» in the eschatological sense with these three propositions:

To say this is to anticipate what will be said a little later about the Christian «story,» but the point is of the greatest importance at this stage of our discussion.

Another factor entering into the discussion at this point is the increasing willingness of critical scholars to accept the premise that Jesus did, in fact, «cast out demons» in a way considered remarkable by his contemporaries.

Patriarch Pimen of Moscow wrote to the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches pointing out the misgivings of the Russian Orthodox Church with regard to the salvation discussion at Bangkok.