Sentences with phrase «discussion point in an article»

They don't necessarily need to know every discussion point in an article.

Not exact matches

Marketing expert Carla Johnson explains how in this article, using step - by - step discussion points to help build your case.

I meant to state that this is a reply to another article, but it has several very valid points in relation to several discussions here and religion in general.

Focussing on the notion of prehension as the basis of a concept of «shared existence,» Cobb stresses the possibility» of an «ecological theology» to counter the Kantian overemphasis on the human point of view.8 A fuller discussion of Whitehead's ecological dimension is to be found in an article by John B. Bennet.9 Bennet suggests three possible sources of Whitehead's value to ecological thinking.

4 For more extended discussion of this point, cf. my article «Substance - Society - Natural System: A Creative Rethinking of Whitehead's Cosmology» in International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (1985), 3 - 13.

I was delighted to see that Rod Dreher has used my article on the church in exile as the starting point for a discussion of which Christian tradition will prove most helpful to Christians in the U.S. in the coming years.

Henry P. Van Dusen of Union Theological Seminary, New York, in another article in the Christian Century entitled, «What Stanley Jones Missed at Madras» tried to answer the criticism of Jones.38 Van Dusen pointed out that Stanley Jones was guilty of an «elementary confusion of thought» in his discussion of Kingdom and Church.

Not to put too partisan a ring on it, but the same article — and the discussion it has prompted — points out that women in the red states are having 12 percent more babies than women in the blue states.

I think I've been reading other version's of this article on this site before — the point is that year in year out we have pretty much the same discussions while the only constant in all of this is Wenger.

The section editor wrote a 10 page «discussion» pointing out all the ways in which the article wasn't worth the paper it was printed on.

Steve: You have this article leading off a section in the magazine and the way you approach things is through a discussion of tipping points.

Just a week later, anonymous bloggers at the PubPeer website, a forum for postpublication discussion of scientific results, started pointing out anomalies in image 1i in the research article.

One point not mentioned in the discussion so far is the role of Bob Pianta's work in Gladwell's article.

There are valid points made in this article, and then it's almost completely undone with an inane discussion of websites and pdfs.

Plenty, as I will point out below, and in some follow up discussions in later articles.

Good point about the gov» t insurance on counter-party risk, and a nice add to the discussion — definitely something I missed in the article!

The series of articles in this topic are designed to provide discussions points when meeting with a prospective commercial lender.

His recent guest article on Pielke Sr's site is a case in point, and provides the fodder for our discussion today.

Clearly, the sea ice volume data plot is the single most important topic of discussion, yet in the article it is shown in Figure 1 with a poor vertical scale and amongst linear trend lines which mislead and make the curve appear to be linear and reach the zero point far out in the future.

In one of my other recent articles, I describe how the PBS NewsHour's 1996 - to - present bias in its global warming discussion segments presents only four instances where any semblance of skeptic science points were mentioned out of more than 355 on - air broadcast discussions (plus a few online pages directly relating to some of those segmentsIn one of my other recent articles, I describe how the PBS NewsHour's 1996 - to - present bias in its global warming discussion segments presents only four instances where any semblance of skeptic science points were mentioned out of more than 355 on - air broadcast discussions (plus a few online pages directly relating to some of those segmentsin its global warming discussion segments presents only four instances where any semblance of skeptic science points were mentioned out of more than 355 on - air broadcast discussions (plus a few online pages directly relating to some of those segments).

The point of origin in this discussion was the article that illustrates an influence of «solution aversion» to how people assess the science related to climate change.

Created under Article 3.9 of the Kyoto Protocol, the AWG was set up in order to discuss further commitments by Annex I parties (industrialized nations) for the post-2012 second commitment period — Since the Kyoto Protocol is to be effective from 2008 - 2012 (first commitment period), the AWG's role at this point is to create a framework and timetable capable of guiding such discussion and ensuring that there is no gap year (s) between the first and second commitment period.

The purpose of the discussion threads is to allow notification and correction of errors in the article, and to permit clarification of related points.

As a closing point, in Simonsohn's widely publicized discussions of academic fraud last year e.g. here, Simonsohn stated that compliant articles ought to disclose «failed» calculations, as well as the ones reported (see Simmons et al 2011 here.)

As President Obama recently noted in his article in Science, «the irreversible momentum of clean energy» will be difficult to overcome — it just might take a while for this momentum to build to the point where the discussion on clean v. dirty energy is moot due to the favorable economics of clean energy alone.

Third, although the article ended with a substantial discussion of responsible argumentation over the issue of hurricanes and global warming in the mainstream press, as an apparent model they pointed to their own public commentary:

SecularAnimist # 40 I couldn't help noticing in the first sentence: ``... scientists said...»:) Salient points I can take away from this article and bring into discussions:

A much longer discussion of this point is found in my article in (2002), 81 Canadian Bar Review 529.

The starting point in the discussion is the seminal article by S.D. Warren & L.D. Brandeis, «The Right to Privacy» (1890) 4 Harv.

-- Other ABS Initiatives, Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers, Amsterdam, May 5, 2008 (For some discussion of this point, see also pp.11 - 13 in the ABA Canons Centennial article «Lawyers as Service Providers»)

Discussion points from the article: - Exchanges confirmed they would list BTU (Bitcoin Unlimited) as an altcoin should there be a Hard Fork Bitcoin's greatest Asset is its brand awareness — the strongest brand in crypto space Bitcoin Unlimited will just become an altcoin if it does not...

It's a National magazine, and as such to repost the BC article is a good thing to generate discussion only, not to put myself out as a (non) expert, not vitriol as in your private email reminding me that I am not an expert; at no point did I ever suggest I was, Marny.