Sentences with phrase «discussion reviews studies»

The following discussion reviews studies of emotional functioning in parents and its relationship with language and behavioral developments in deaf children.

Not exact matches

• In Theological Studies a Jesuit who to the best of my knowledge I have never met reviews Ian Markham's excellent book Plurality and Christian Ethics (see FT discussion, «Truth and Tolerance,» October 1994).

He prefaced each rape with a Bible study, in which after a review of a certain passage and discussion he would then begin to rape the victim.

The results of a Cochrane review will be presented, along with a discussion of what was learned about such studies in the process.

Information was also derived by reading case studies published in NMAA newsletters, by holding discussions with women who had balanced breastfeeding and work, and from a literature review of relevant articles identified from electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL).

Supporting the feedback from our study, Friedewald et al. (Friedewald et al., 2005) in a review of 91 all male discussion forums that included 670 expectant fathers, found participants valued a male facilitator, felt the importance of their role as a father was acknowledged, and were able to discuss their fears and concerns without shame or embarrassment.

Also, see whether the study has been replicated, if it was published in a peer - reviewed journal, and don't forget to check out the researcher's own discussion of limitations.

This study examines the newspaper articles published in «The Age» newspaper subsequent to the release of the Government discussion paper «improving maternity services in Australia» in 2008 [1] that heralded the national review of maternity services consultation process.

Many are members of major research networks in political and legal studies, such as the Institute for Global Law and Policy based at Harvard Law School, and edit prominent sites of scholarly discussion such as the debuting London Review of International Law.

Published early online in CANCER, a peer - reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, the study found that factors such as gender, education, and insurance status may impact whether patients and their physicians have discussions and take actions to preserve fertility during cancer treatment.

Specifically, the reviewed data showed that analysis and discussion included sex as an independent variable in less than 33 % (432 of 1303) of surgical clinical research studies.

This contributes to policy discussion on Medicaid expansion by providing evidence that public outlays on Medicaid are well spent,» said Kimberly Johnson, associate professor at the Brown School and co-author of the study, «The Effect of Health Insurance on Childhood Cancer Survival in the United States,» published Sept. 11 in CANCER, a peer - reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society.

We encourage readers to evaluate the rationale for the discussion of biases within the studies as these represent a critical component — transparency — of the systematic review methodology.

The interactions between these p53 family members have been thoroughly reviewed by Moll and Slade [16], and the implications for the results of this study are explained further in the Discussion section.

It also transports cholesterol from extra-hepatic sites, including the arterial wall, to the liver for excretion via reverse cholesterol transport.77 Results from IER (60 - 85 % ER / alternate days) trials have thus far been inconsistent, with some reporting decreases 40, and others increases 37, 39, but with the majority showing no effects on HDL cholesterol levels.38, 42, 43, 45, 49, 51, 52Inconsistencies may have arisen due to the biphasic response of HDL documented by studies of ER induced weight - loss, whereby levels typically decrease during active weight - loss then either return to baseline or (less commonly) rise following attainment of weight stability.78 Complementary increases in HDL levels and particle size have been shown when endurance exercise have been combined with IER 42, 46, 47 however further discussion goes beyond the scope of this review.

To specifically address these questions, recent review articles published in influential, peer - reviewed publications were selected for this current discussion, as these review articles rigorously evaluate and summarize findings across a number of scientific studies and provide the overall «state of knowledge.»

E.J.M.F., M.M., I.S., E.M., C.L., S.J.S., N.G.F., and N.J.W. contributed to discussion, reviewed and edited the manuscript, contributed to study conception and design and interpretation of data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.

This discussion shows that education studies vary so much in their scientific rigor that one can not just review them based on press releases and the sensationalism of the reported results.

REVIEW Science teachers looking to engage their students in a more meaningful way can use case studies in classroom discussions and small group learning, and this site gives you all the information and resources you need to get started.

Anyone interested in a more complete discussion of these 10 analyses and why it is important to focus on the random - assignment studies, should read Patrick Wolf's article in the BYU Law Review that has been reproduced here.

In these studies, hands - on activities were employed in combination with other types of structured activities to advance participant learning, such as discussions (Freeman et al., 1994), lectures (Fortner & Boyd, 1995), the use of «exemplary» instructional materials (Khourey - Bowers et al., 2005) and research reviews (Even, 1999).

Moreover, we are able to help you with thesis topic choice, academic formatting, outline writing, questionnaire development, analysis of study results, primary and secondary data gathering and analysis, discussion writing, literature review, and editing / proofreading.

Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for another blog entry at this site: The Trinity study should never have passed peer review.»

Comprised of group discussions, webinars, case study reviews, a midterm test, and a final test including in - depth written and 30 - minute verbal exams, the program teaches trainers how to work extremely closely with clients.

For example, Saunders quotes William Gray's off - the - cuff criticism of a study by Naomi Oreskes that demonstrated the existence of an overwhelming consensus in the peer - reviewed scientific literature on the reality of anthropogenic climate change (see our previous discussion of that study).

[11:20 p.m. Updated Prompted by Twitter discussions (more evidence that 140 characters can matter) I'm adding this note to stress that publicity has preceded peer review on research supportive of fracking, as well, as was the case recently with a State University of New York, Buffalo, study.]

The discussion has centered on a new study reviewing how anthropogenic global warming was characterized in more than 12,000 climate science papers between 1991 and 2011.

The study will be published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, an open - access «discussion» journal, and will not have formal peer review prior to its appearance online later this week.

The Louisiana bill calls for, «an environment within public elementary and secondary schools that promotes critical thinking skills, logical analysis, and open and objective discussion of scientific theories being studied including... global warming...» The bill also calls for «instructional materials to help students understand, analyze, critique, and review scientific theories in an objective manner.»

The peer - reviewed study which appeared in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, estimated that methane emissions from B.C.'s shale gas basins are now at least 2.5 times higher than provincial government estimates.

When asked if the discussion paper could be taken into consideration in the on - going round of scientific review by IPCC, [Pachauri] said, «IPCC studies only peer - review science.

No CI, correlation coefficient, discussion of uncertainty nor of alternate hypotheses, reference to peer - reviewed studies to affirm its interpretations.

«A citizens audit of the IPCC study found that 5,587 cited references, nearly a third of all sources, were not peer - reviewed publications, but rather «grey literature,» such as press releases, newspaper and magazine articles, discussion papers, masters and PhD theses, working papers and advocacy literature published by environmental groups,» Sensenbrenner said.

Studies include Berner et al. (1983); Kasting and Ackerman (1986); for review, Crowley and North (1991); more recently, Hoffmann et al. (1998); the term «snowball Earth» was coined by Joseph Kirschvink Kirschvink (1992); earlier Manabe called it «White Earth» according to Gleick (1987), p. 332; for references and popular - level discussion, see Ward and Brownlee (2000).

The report reviews other Canadian studies, including a British Columbia discussion paper from 2011 and a technical report done for Elections Canada in 2010, and mentions some others on Internet voting.

After being approached to work on the project in late 2015, HSF studied the issue, drew up proposals for discussion and joined a working group to review and test the indicators.

Conversely, if you tell me that you saw our discussions in LinkedIn Groups and on Twitter, noticed our latest press release about opening a new branch, or reviewed our case studies, then I would be impressed.

Permanency Outcomes for Toddlers in Child Welfare Two Years After a Randomized Trial of a Parenting Intervention Spieker, Oxford, & Fleming, (2014) Children and Youth Services Review, 44 View Abstract Reports on child welfare outcomes of a community - based, randomized control trial of Promoting First Relationships, a 10 - week relationship - based home visiting program, on stability of children's placements and permanency status 2 years after enrollment into the study; includes findings and a discussion.

In the event of disagreement concerning the eligibility of a given study, we will reach consensus through discussion and by consultation with another review author (JB).

For an interesting discussion of why living together fails miserably as a «trial marriage,» as well as a review of a number of other studies that give similar results as the University of Wisconsin study, check out two articles written by Dr. Willard Harley.

Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services, 1988, pp. 36, 38 - 39; C. James Richardson, Divorce and Family Mediation Research Study in Three Canadian Cities, Ministry of Supply and Services, 1988, pp. 287 - 288; Frank F. Furstenberg, Jr., Christine Winquist Nord, James L. Peterson, and Nicholas Zill, «The Life Course of Children of Divorce: Marital Disruption and Parental Contact,» American Sociological Review, 48 (1983): 656 - 668, Table 6, p. 663; Federal / Provincial / Territorial Family Law Committee, Department of Justice, Canada, Custody and Access: Public Discussion Paper, Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services, 1993, p. 17.

After the adolescent assented and the mother consented to participate in the study, following procedures approved by the university's institutional review board, they completed the questionnaires and participated in a 15 - min videotaped discussion of diabetes stress.

E.R.: blind rating of studies for inclusion in review, discussion and interpretation of results.