Sentences with phrase «discussion threads where»

Under the Forum tab you also have links to the discussion threads where you will post your reflections during each module.

Some MOOCs include discussion threads where kids can post assignments and receive immediate feedback from the MOOC instructor and from other students taking the MOOC.

I stumbled across a Sober Recovery discussion thread where I read a comment that stuck.

I knew you'd think of that, as that was the discussion thread where I met you and your fine work!

Not exact matches

As has been said Oliver Hart was a Speedway rider and possibly the last to use the old Leg trailing style of riding dating back to the» 40's and earlier In light of the most recent discussion about porn in this thread on Deadskirts, I decided to put my money where my mouth is and bought a clip from a non

This problem popped up in an XDA - Discussions forum thread last week, where users who forced Zune to update their DVPs to Mango noticed the phone's compass wasn't behaving correctly.

There is a discussion thread going on over at the Amazon site where members are posting some of the random things they do with their Kindles in addition to «just» reading books.

Keep threads on topic and boards running smoothly (including moving non-MoneySaving related discussions to Discussion Time / MoneySavers Arms where appropriate)

Set forth below is the text of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for one of my columns at the Value Walk site: «Everything that you are describing is the sort of thing that you would expect to see when the P / E10 level is where it is today in the event that Shiller is right and stock investing really is a highly emotional endeavor.»

I wish you were in another thread where I'm currently in «discussion» about the WiiU.

You could put your ideas in a thread where people are inviting it, where the discussion's about the topic, not about you.

John, On the «Presentation: Precautionary Principle...» thread you told me that you think it's «unhelpful to conflate discussion of climate - science issues like the modelling of SO2, about which none of us here know very much, with discussion of economic projections, where we can have a useful discussion.»

And there is a cost — this thread of petty point - scoring and ridicule approaches 400 comments, while the much more productive thread on your review reply, where the «denizens» could actually contribute something to a real scientific discussion, languishes in near silence.

Others interested in the futile discussion with AK may like to see the comments on this thread, where AK ended up simply posting silly pictures, like this: http://judithcurry.com/2015/01/24/week-in-review-40/#comment-668596.

My discussion below is not meant to weaken kuhnkat's citation by attacking a weaker one of my own as substitute for his; in everything I say below, I hope to equally apply the logic to both, and where any find disastisfaction with this reasoning as applied to Englebeen, please reply to the thread with details.

Discussion of creationism is restricted because creationists take any opportunity to promote their belief to the destruction of any thread where they are given an opportunity to evangelise.

I think this is following on the discussion on the other thread, where it was stated that lack of accuracy in model inputs places limits on how well we can expect models to match past temperature records.

It seems that this has changed recently, though: Anthony now has an update in his second discussion second thread where he notes that «With the advent of the successor display to the MMTS unit, the LCD display based Nimbus, which has memory for up to 35 days (see spec sheet here http://www.srh.noaa.gov/srh/dad/coop/nimbus-spec.pdf) they stopped worrying about daily readings and simply filled them in at the end of the month by stepping through the display.»

Given that it's next to impossible for me to engage in a direct exchange with someone here because of Judith's moderation of my comments, I'll just link to a couple of previous threads where I've been engaged in discussion about how Schneider's comments play out in the climate wars: Besides, I wouldn't want to subject you to more «long abstract musing,» right?

I will summarize where I am on this after a long discussion on the previous thread.

And it can point to half - a-dozen discussion threads on Apple's support forums where users complain a gray flicker that appears on the top of the iPhone's display as well as an unresponsive touchscreen.

In fact, there are whole discussion threads on sites like BiggerPockets just trying to figure out where to start or where to grow your business.