Typically
discussions about carbon emissions revolve around tons of carbon.
Not exact matches
The
discussion talks explicitly
about how diminishing terrestrial and ocean
carbon sinks over time require reduced CO2
emissions from fossil fuels / land use to achieve stabilization goals at various levels (e.g. 550 ppmv of CO2 in the atmosphere).
This whole
discussion about burning fossil fuels, cap and trade, the EPA attempt to regulate
carbon emissions and the current actions of Congress to stop EPA is ALL rooted and based in the Greenhouse Theory.
This is a good faith
discussion about what the available technology can achieve and the best way to successfully reduce these
emissions balanced with efficiency and
carbon (CO2)
emissions.
She was in town this past week to speak at the 11th annual New York Fashion Conference and I stopped by Edelman's offices to speak with her
about sustainable fashion, consumer trends towards reuse, eBay's
carbon emission reduction goal, upcoming announcements in 2010, and more — click through for our
discussion: TreeHugger: The Re + Purpose campaign just wrapped up, where the Green Team collaborated with green blogs to encourage consumers to find new value in existing products, what can we expect in 2010?
«When you have Japan, [South] Korea and China having
discussions around a north Asian
carbon club; when you've got China and Korea having
discussions around how do we treat
emissions across borders and what's the lowest cost to our economies to meet our
emissions targets; when you have China and New Zealand having those conversations
about establishing direct engagement because they both have a functioning
carbon market with a price; those conversations and those emerging what's being called «
carbon clubs» is something that Australia should be participating in,» he says.