There are many another blog for
discussions about energy solutions.
As you (I think) mentioned earlier, his general
discussions about energy consumption are, I think, very intelligent and important.
As the voice of Canada's upstream natural gas industry, we know that Canadians want to have a balanced
discussion about energy, the economy and the environment.
«We have to have an honest
discussion about energy» during the 3 - month moratorium, she said.
If we don't start with this very basic, fundamental point, then we're not really having
a discussion about energy development or climate change.
Why can't we have a rational
discussion about the energy and global climate change?
That is especially why intermixing forcing into
a discussion about energy transfer is so misleading.
Goreham's session was summarized in the NEPPA conference material as offering «
a discussion about energy, electricity and modern society, with common sense about climate change, public policy, and implications for the power industry.»
The discussion about energy still treats demand for energy as something that has to be met, almost begrudgingly, by authority, for the sake of merely coping.
Any public
discussion about energy should be transparent.
Not exact matches
But while we certainly haven't solved every issue facing urban residents, there is an urgency and
energy toward improving economic opportunity in cities that is lacking in the
discussion about rural communities.
In the intended - to - be-secret «internal agenda document» were plans for detailed
discussions about economic,
energy, security, military and other forms of integration.
Show description: Tom embarks on an epic rant, there is a
discussion about Mercedes» autopilot, the big secret Gigafactory meeting, speculation
about Model Y, talk of the appearance of Faraday Future's FF91, and plenty of Space X and clean
energy discussion.
Second, we need a national vision as to the role that
energy should play in our economy, and an informed
discussion about the policies that will be needed to ensure that Canada's diverse array of
energy resources continues to be source of competitive advantage.
But the company, Spectra
Energy Corp., said former federal Conservative government house leader Jay Hill's role in the
discussions about those laws has probably been very minor and, in any case, represents just part of the work he does for the company.
If you're interested in hearing more
about all Canadian
energy opportunities, the Canadian Consulate will host a press conference and information session on Monday at 2:00 p.m., followed by a panel
discussion at 4 p.m.
We are not sure what to do
about it yet, but there was a lot of
energy and
discussion about what the possibilities are.
This includes a
discussion about your current lifestyle, health, past and present food choices, a 7 - day tailored meal plan, grocery list and cooking class to kick start a healthier you as well as yummy giveaways like healthy chocolates,
energy bars and treats!
-LRB-... In a presentation Thursday at the Broome County Office Building, a representative from GasFrac
Energy Services Inc. said the firm, which has worked on natural gas and oil rigs in Canada and Texas, has had
discussions with gas companies
about contracting to tap into the state's portion of the Marcellus.
Similar to the debate on fracking, public opposition to the gas port became part of a larger
discussion about New York State's
energy policy and how the state should respond to climate change.
After a Cabinet
discussion about the Union on Tuesday, ministers who attended the meeting said that Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat
Energy Secretary, argued strongly that arguments against independence would not work.
As we do everything we can to assist this plant in the near - term, we hope this situation will spark a broader
discussion about real reform of our state's
energy marketplace.
Schlesinger, himself a member of the advisory board, noted that the group has not met since August and that
discussions about the designation of biomass
energy were «kind of left hanging as to what was happening.»
Discussions have begun with the
energy division of South Pacific Forum
about projects to reduce emissions from small island states.
But Nakagawa expects the
discussion of
energy policy will include «what to do
about Monju.»
We thank Matthias Tecza, Stuart Lynn, Kelly Borden, Laura Whyte, Brooke Simmons, David Hogg, Daniel Foreman - Mackey, Thomas Jennings, Layne Wright, Cecile Faure, Jonathan Coles, Stuart Lowe, Alexander Fritz and Jean - Paul Kneib for many useful conversations
about citizen science and gravitational lens detection, and for helping guide the
discussion at Space Warps Talk, and to the Dark
Energy Survey and Pan-STARRS strong lensing science teams for their suggestions and encouragement.
Discussions about indoor air quality emerged in the 1970s as a result of the
energy crisis leading to home construction that was more efficient by way of being sealed up tight... and subsequently lacking ventilation.
While not wishing to get into a philosophical
discussion about whether it applies in every situation, it is certainly true in the case of
energy use in buildings.
They were provided with unbiased information
about climate change and
energy and
about the international
discussions on policy measures to handle these issues.
Resist the temptation to pour significant
energy into
discussions with colleagues and your administration
about school - wide issues, at least during your first year in the classroom.
I've recently had a very long
discussion about this on another list and don't have the
energy to repeat it.
If you want really new and interesting results, look at Bart's recent
discussions about aerosols, or Ron talking
about dust and hurricanes, but made - up
energy transfer theories?
Where, for example, is the
discussion about population stability, empowering women and children, feeding the poor, finding alternative sources of
energy, * learning to love one another?
When the Heartland Institute held its gathering in New York City last year celebrating climate skepticism, Exxon Mobil made a point of saying it had stopped contributing money to that group, explaining that it did not want to support groups «whose position on climate change could divert attention from the important
discussion about how the world will secure the
energy required for economic growth in an environmentally responsible manner.»
Without going into technical details
about the dynamics and thermodynamics involved in tropical storms and hurricanes (an excellent
discussion of this can be found here), the basic connection between the two is actually fairly simple: warm water, and the instability in the lower atmosphere that is created by it, is the
energy source of hurricanes.
I know some here will decry that I am not talking
about the issues because I do not try to obsfuscate with a
discussion of the spot market price of coal vs long - term contracts, or use of coal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads
about politicians who oppose coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS
about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other
energy source), and it IS
about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other
energy alternative).
Lastly assigning «temperature» to a vibrationally excited CO2 molecule by equating the vibration
energy to 1 / 2kT (as a rule of thumb) gives it a temperature of
about 2000K which fits nowhere in this
discussion.
We said at the time that we had discontinued contributions to several public policy research groups whose position on climate change could divert attention from the important
discussion about how the world will secure the
energy required for economic growth in an environmentally responsible manner.
But I wanted to start a
discussion here
about the relative importance of forging legislation to cap and trade carbon, negotiating international agreements, or pursuing an
energy - technology quest as a way of attacking the many
energy - related issues confronting the planet in the next few decades, including climate.
Nuclear power is a viable
energy source that we have been unable to have a
discussion about.
First, we can't have a serious
discussion about a federal
energy innovation strategy without recognizing the issue of investment scale, which today is the most critical question.
What's remarkable in the
discussion about responses is how few people have tried to explain how we can replace 90 % of the current
energy generated globally with fossil fuels with renewables.
An advantage to doing this is it would force
discussion about climate to use system
energy instead of transient maxes or mins that contain so little information.
It is from this perspective that I've been following the
discussion about how best to balance wind
energy development and military operations in North Carolina.
has a
discussion and documentation, including
energy balances, (actually EROI = 10.5 in this presentation) of some of the points I was trying to make with Ender
about the highly evolved efficiency of the Brazilian ethanol industry.
The
discussion about radiative heat transfer shows how temperature differences regulate the amount of
energy transferred between objects.
Last week, we featured an on - going
discussion about solar costs in Florida, where lawmakers are considering adding a small surcharge on monthly electric bills to boost the amount of renewable
energy deployed in the state.
Of course,
discussion about the potential for CDR to enable an all - of - the - above
energy strategy is moot unless we invest in developing a portfolio of CDR approaches.
Our plenary sessions will engage industry experts, political leaders and key stakeholders in
discussions about the main opportunities and challenges currently faced by Canada's wind
energy industry.
Chris Conway, an
Energy Probe staffer at the time, told me that there was considerable
discussion about whether the Pollution Probe Foundation endorsement would appear on the final product.