Sentences with phrase «discussions about the evidence»

After viewing the video, observers then participate in discussions about the evidence they collected for that strategy or classroom behavior.

Both Homan's diagrams and Ambrogi's blog post have been well circulated online and the lively discussion about them evidences a growing awareness of the importance of lawyer bios and a sincere interest in improving them.

They make their decisions through collective discussions about the evidence.

Concluding that the Claimant had been party to a discussion about her evidence, in flagrant disregard of warnings given by the Employment Tribunal on six separate occasions that the Claimant must not do so when giving evidence, the Employment Tribunal concluded that it had irretrievably lost trust in the Claimant and could no longer fairly hear her case.

Not exact matches

The new evidence also revives the discussion about the export of commercial spyware abroad, and how nation - states are using them to undermine entities they deem as political threats.

And all of the discussion about political correctness, all of the evidence we see of internalized woman - hatred and gynophobic attitudes in women, clearly reveal that gynaffectionate feminist separatism, while loosening our bonds, does not remove all that is alienating.

What can be said about the scientific evidence in this discussion?

There is quite a difference here I find between those who insist something is not worth thinking about or discussion because evidence or proof does not (and perhaps can not) exist, and those who say «so what?»

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

Whenever you believe in something without evidence, believe that this thing is ordained by the most intelligent being in the universe, and that no amount of reasoning or discussion can change your mind about it, then you make a culture war completely inevitable.

No amount of discussion, no citation of evidence, can alter the opinions of radical feminists about abortion.

I've witnessed literally to thousands of college students in one - on - one discussions and when it comes down to it, most of them could care less about the excellent historical, scientific, and textual evidence we have for our faith.

But «a moral discussion is inconclusive and even trivial, if it leaves out the question of its application,» as Gregory Vlastos has said.13 In order to be as specific as possible about this approach to Christian social philosophy I shall outline in arbitrary fashion five general principles which I suggest can be supported by the evidence of human experience as being necessary guides to the conditions under which the Good Society can grow.

If you care to apply the proper word (believe) to how you feel about or toward other minds and evidence, then we would not even be having this discussion, for why would I argue against your accurate description of what you believe?

if you were really about following the science, our discussion would be about the nature of those evidences — something you notably have avoided.

e.g. pop up tomorrow with substantiated evidence supporting the existence of your deity and we'll have an open, frank, and sincere discussion about it.

Friendly Atheist: On Tuesday I wrote a post for Relevant Online about Christianity and evolution that generated a lively discussion, particularly over at Friendly Atheist, where Hemant Mehta argues that it's not enough to say that the evidence supports evolution; one must concede that the evidence rules God out completely.

As per the discussion about children born with ambiguous genitalia, the evidence seems to suggest that human sexuality — one's sex, identity, and orientation — need to be understood as three separate spectrums and not as rigid one - or - the - other binary realities.

A special feature in this movie is that the filmmaker anticipates possible legal complaints lodged by Nestlé: It shows again and again discussions with a lawyer about deficiencies in evidence for the allegations by the Whistleblower.

However, shared decision - making requires taking the time and willingness to engage in evidence - based discussions with women about the pros and cons of different care options.

They choose to single - out and shame, rather than contribute to an evidence - based discussion about physical harm.

Flynn had assured Vice President Mike Pence that he never had any discussions about the sanctions with Russia's ambassador, but the Justice Department found evidence to the contrary and informed Trump on Jan. 26.

Workers» groups are particularly concerned about the business secretary's consultation on «protected conversations», which would allow employers to have frank discussions with staff about underperformance without worrying that the conversation could later be used in evidence at a tribunal.

The ideal process combines the best available evidence about the benefits and harms of an intervention with the patient's values and preferences, as part of a discussion with their general practitioner (GP) or health professional.

«While there is increasing discussion about the role of social engagement in disaster preparedness, until now there has been little evidence - based research on the topic,» says Wiraporn Pothisiri, a demographer at Chulalongkorn University.

That's the take - home message from a global survey of Ph.D. and master's students published today, which adds to the meager but growing literature on the subject and corroborates anecdotal evidence and discussion about the topic from recent years, including a number of personal tragedies and numerous testimonials and concerns expressed on social media and elsewhere.

Now, we could end the discussion here, but chances are you have doubts because you've heard about or seen evidence to the contrary, indicating that strength and size aren't as connected as I'm claiming they are.

For example, science and English language arts teachers may have students read multiple texts about a scientific issue that is relevant to their lives or community, then ask them to evaluate the evidence and reasoning of the various texts in a collaborative discussion and write a persuasive essay in which they take a stance on the issue.

Our plan is grounded in the following two premises: 1) When purposefully synchronized with one another across multiple forms of media («cross-media»), children's and adolescents» exposure to high quality youth - oriented social and ethical story content, i.e. stories of substance specifically about character development, compassion, and courage (CCC), is a powerful way to promote youth academic achievement and ethical values; 2) Especially if these stories, told and «read» across media, in their various genres (human interest, biography, history and historical fiction, civic engagement, coming of age, social change, spiritual awakening, moral issues, etc.), are «taught» by «educators» (broadly defined) using an «evidence - based» pedagogy that A) makes use of peer to peer, and adult facilitated group discussion and debate as a primary form of instruction, and B) takes advantage of access to the texts of the story that are made available cross-media (narratives, scripts, videos, etc.) to foster students» critical thinking and ethical reflection skills.

There was limited evidence of discussion with students about progress and attainment.

The studies should be at the center of any discussion of educational reform, because they offer by far the clearest evidence about which parts of it are working and which are not.

At the conference I had a number of interesting discussions about national standards where I pressed advocates to describe the theory or evidence behind the push to nationalize standards, curriculum, and assessments.

There has been little discussion of eliminating the longevity portion of teachers» salaries, even though over one - quarter of the total wage bill goes to bonuses for teachers with greater than two years of experience (around the cutoff in the evidence about the returns to experience).

With New Orleans and Washington, D.C., serving as the nation's largest case studies, and other international examples as well, there is now a robust enough evidence base to inform a far more sophisticated discussion about choice.

Recently, I had a discussion about Common Core with several university level educational leaders who expressed the need for students to be better prepared for college: to read and write in a more academic manner, to make logical inferences, and to cite specific evidence from the text to support their conclusions.

Focusing on evidence prompted further discussions about lesson planning, learning progressions, tiered levels of support, and new instructional strategies to move individual students from where they are to where they need to be.

This suggested process of teaching with the Frayer Model aligns with the previously discussed evidence - based features of making the terms vivid (Vaughn et al., 2009), returning to the words multiple times throughout a unit of instruction (Lara - Alecio et al., 2012), and fostering discussion about the words and concepts students are learning (Vaughn et al., 2013).

Even aside from the nuances of grades being given as general evidence or about a specific lesson, this discussion has underlined some crucial principles that schools should take heed of.

They learned to keep their focus on evidence, not judgment, and to express «wonderings» about what they saw, allowing for open discussion of the classroom evidence.

After a read aloud, center student discussion around the following questions, citing evidence from the text to support their answers: • Who was the main character in the story (i.e., who was the story mostly about)?

Notes starting from April 18, 2007 Notes starting from May 22, 2007 covered the following topics: Interesting Quote, Price Peaks, An Illusion of Numbers, Subtle Observation about Dividend Capture, Building On a 45 - Year Retirement, Starting at 5 %, Starting at 5 % with Risk, Evidence - Based Technical Analysis, Rock Bottom Withdrawal Rate, More Interesting Quotes, Monitoring the Dividend Blend, Automatic Allocator, Back of the Envelope: Dividend Blend, Dividend Rule of Thumb, Excellent Discussions, Honeymoon, Dividend Blend Rule of Thumb, Scenario Surfer Status Report, Morningstar?

Yet they do have all the time in the world to waste arguing about the absence of evidence on a discussion board with the general public and defending their beliefs not based on evidence.

My discussion of that question in Santa Barbara was the focus of a Kit Stolz story about the talk, and at least one reaction to that coverage could be seen as evidence that my confidence in Web - based climate communication is misplaced.

On twitter when Gavin first responded saying «but there's no evidence for this» after I'd sent a link to a paper by Shakhova and Semiletov talking in some detail about methane clathrates at the ESAS and permafrost, I didn't grasp that their discussions were actually not proven.

Maybe it's that you want to have a discussion about what counts as «evidence» in science, which is very interesting to me.

Your latest waffle of 220 words again misses the point, getting into a discussion of whether CAGW is a «premise» or «conclusion», musing about the semantic difference between a «forecast» and a «projection» and citing a post on a Roger Pielke Jr. blogsite about «predictions», but NOT citing the empirical scientific evidence to support the IPCC premise of CAGW.

I do not believe that my reply saying that the fact was only one in Courtney's fantasy, can be really misunderstood by anyone who is clear in his mind, in a way that it referred to his meta statement about what the discussion was about, but not to what Courtney explicitly claimed the fact was, that global warming «stopped», particularly since I also mentioned the missing evidence for it in the same sentence.

Would be wonderful if everyone who engaged publicly in these discussions were careful about how they used evidence, but many aren't and expecting all those who engage publicly to have a good understanding of the scientific method, and best scientific practices, is probably unrealistic.

I have written much about the use of evidence in discussion in my message above.

Since you agree with the words you quoted, you should be able to understand the actual bee in my bonnet here, which I'll restate: thus far this has been an evidence - based discussion about a specific issue, with a minimum of snark.