I did not agree and
our discussions ended at that point.
Not exact matches
At some
point, I got lost in the
discussion and wished for a more definite
ending.
In the
end, this one status update sparked a 22 - comment - long
discussion thread involving six people (including me), none of whom except the two other Rice alumni were connected in any way other than through having known me
at some
point.
As McGowan
points out, the
discussions really allow for a chance to gain insight and new knowledge in which the students can include in their final papers
at the
end of the semester.
In a vacuum and in theory I get that you can't go on past performance
at the
end of the day as a main factor for future performance, but then that would be the
end of all debate and
discussion regarding mutual funds and everything else under the sun for
point # 1.
Sadly, because the method of selecting start and
end points has the appearance of being deliberately selected by CMS to find the figures that most confirmed the prior reasoning, than any valid method — we've had this
discussion here
at CE, years ago, when Girma was pulling the same stunts — it is of course going to be the outcome that valid methods find this flaw in the endpoints CMS proposed.
heads up: my (P / PH / H) EV
discussion ending at 104 - 105 (+106) left some
points and loose
ends that I would have liked to have tied up / clarify, but anyone interested could probably figure it out anyway.
Nest employees who were on the call
ended the
discussion under the impression that the decision had come from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, although Amazon's retail team didn't explicitly say that
at any
point, according to a person familiar with the call.
It may be a combination of services, so that people are able to receive help from a legal professional
at the
points in the process where they need it most — so even if they
end up representing themselves, they have an initial
discussion about what they need or want to do.