Rather than going to a courtroom where the proceedings are a matter of public record,
the discussions in collaborative law are held privately, in confidence.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated
in the forward - looking statements include, among others, the following: our ability to successfully and profitably market our products and services; the acceptance of our products and services by patients and healthcare providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform
law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes
in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining
collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described
in the Risk Factors and
in Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10 - Q.
The
discussion in Jacksonville focused on cutting edge thought
in collaborative practice, including flexibility of models, streamlining of roles and meetings, innovation
in pricing structures, and the coming convergence of
collaborative law and mediation.
The possibility of reconciliation is no more likely to enter into mediation
discussions than
in traditional forms of dispute resolution or
in collaborative law.
From my
discussions with
Collaborative and Cooperative
Law practitioners, the attorney's obligation to advocate for their client is alive and well
in both of these alternatives.
The idea behind
collaborative family
law is that instead of spending time and money
in courtrooms, couples talk out their divorce through mediation and back - and - forth
discussion, Susko said.
Attorney Juliette Ford continues her
discussion on the differences between
collaborative family
law and traditional family
law in the following clip:
Having just finished her first local
collaborative law case, Waddell said shifting from the «us vs. them» mentality an attorney faces
in court was an adjustment, but it allowed more forthright
discussion.
The
discussion in Jacksonville focused on cutting edge thought
in collaborative practice, including flexibility of models, streamlining of roles and meetings, innovation
in pricing structures, and the coming convergence of
collaborative law and mediation.
In the ongoing
discussion of mediation versus
collaborative law, what is becoming more apparent is the need for a hybrid approach for certain of cases that borrows from the best of both processes to meet the needs of complex and / or higher conflict mediation cases.
Collaborative law involves two parties who have employed specially trained lawyers called collaborative lawyers to engage with them under a signed Collaborative Participation Agreement in a process of finding common ground, common goals and paving the way for on - going discussion that will continue between the divorcing couples, hopefully, on an on - going basis long into the future as they will have learned through active listening to hear, process and understand the other person's viewpoint and to respond without anger and rancor to build future positive responses to issues that may arise i
Collaborative law involves two parties who have employed specially trained lawyers called
collaborative lawyers to engage with them under a signed Collaborative Participation Agreement in a process of finding common ground, common goals and paving the way for on - going discussion that will continue between the divorcing couples, hopefully, on an on - going basis long into the future as they will have learned through active listening to hear, process and understand the other person's viewpoint and to respond without anger and rancor to build future positive responses to issues that may arise i
collaborative lawyers to engage with them under a signed
Collaborative Participation Agreement in a process of finding common ground, common goals and paving the way for on - going discussion that will continue between the divorcing couples, hopefully, on an on - going basis long into the future as they will have learned through active listening to hear, process and understand the other person's viewpoint and to respond without anger and rancor to build future positive responses to issues that may arise i
Collaborative Participation Agreement
in a process of finding common ground, common goals and paving the way for on - going
discussion that will continue between the divorcing couples, hopefully, on an on - going basis long into the future as they will have learned through active listening to hear, process and understand the other person's viewpoint and to respond without anger and rancor to build future positive responses to issues that may arise
in the future.