The discussions occurred at a time when board members and district officials also held several public meetings about the 2015 - 16 budget.
Not exact matches
In a paper published in the journal Behavioral Sciences and the Law, scientists
at the University of Colorado School Medicine note that, all too often, the «sensational media attention» surrounding CTE «divorce
discussion of CTE from the well - established natural history and typically favorable prognosis of mTBI,» while,
at the same
time, such reports - and the scientific reports about CTE to which they are connected - imply direct connections between complex, multi-determined behaviors such as murder and / or suicide and mTBIs
occurring in the remote past of individuals engaging in those behaviors.»
So it seems to me that the simple way of communicating a complex problem has led to several fallacies becoming fixed in the
discussions of the real problem; (1) the Earth is a black body, (2) with no materials either surrounding the systems or in the systems, (3) in radiative energy transport equilibrium, (4) response is chaotic solely based on extremely rough appeal to temporal - based chaotic response, (5) but
at the same
time exhibits trends, (6) but
at the same
time averages of chaotic response are not chaotic, (7) the mathematical model is a boundary value problem yet it is solved in the
time domain, (8) absolutely all that matters is the incoming radiative energy
at the TOA and the outgoing radiative energy
at the Earth's surface, (9) all the physical phenomena and processes that are
occurring between the TOA and the surface along with all the materials within the subsystems can be ignored, (10) including all other activities of human kind save for our contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere, (11) neglecting to mention that if these were true there would be no problem yet we continue to expend
time and money working on the problem.
I am not
at this
time addressing all of the other abuses of the hapless laws of thermodynamics and physics in general that
occur in on - list
discussion because I'm just one person, and it has now taken me
at a guess over a hundred posts over three days to mostly convince
at least some of the people who believed that it was true and correct that they were mistaken.
And indeed it would be virtually impossible to show it was other than mere chance that comet impacts
occurred at the right
time, especially given that it would still be necessary to show that the ice sheet would care about comets, which we also consider unlikely (see the good
discussion — particularly Mauri Pelto's comments — on this over
at the Open Mind Blog).