* Tenney Naumer — sometimes the deny / delay crowd riles her up a little too much, but aside from the argumentation Tenney's had some great
discussions of actual data, of which there's sadly too little going on most of the time here.
Not exact matches
But setting aside the tiresome, partisan screaming on both sides about the consequences
of inequality and how to solve it, the renewed
discussion of inequality is flawed by a disregard for
actual data.
This
discussion was on the
actual science
of dendroclimatology and while there are some snide remarks on both sides, I don't see why that would deter anyone from coming here and getting down and dirty over theory or
data.
Discussion of «pulsed stratospheric spraying» creating less noisy
data for analysis
of effects gave me a simple idea — If the input to the models assume that stratospheric spraying has been ongoing for decades, then plug into these models the temperature
data accrued in the three days after 9/11 when, as reported at the time, the mean temperature over the US landmass «inexplicably» rose by 2 degrees C. in only three days while all aircraft were grounded, then the
actual effect
of stratospheric manipulations over US will emerge.