The public element in the offence was satisfied if the act was done where people were present and the nature of what was being done was capable of being seen; the principle was that the public were to be protected from obscene or
disgusting acts which were of a nature that outraged public decency and which were capable of being seen in public.
Not exact matches
As an atheist myself, I find this mindset in
which it's appropriate to
act like some bitter convert to atheism and blatantly attack theists completely
disgusting.
Simon Christie, defending, said his client could not recall what made him burgle the home and commit «these dreadful
acts which appals and
disgusts him» but he had taken a «potentially toxic» combination of drugs.
It's
disgusting for others to see and should be done in a bathroom or public lactation room... not in a restaurant (
which I've made a HUGE scene at for seeing this
act done at the table next to me... and yes that «mother» was asked to leave... she refused the police showed up and ESCORTED HER OUT!
«This was particularly useful for illustrating expressions in
which the forehead is strongly implicated, such as
disgust, resignation and indignation, all of
which Rejlander
acted for the camera.»
The first of these elements consists of two parts: an
act which is lewd, obscene or
disgusting; and
which is such as to outrage public decency.