Not exact matches
Just because YOUR disbelief was not
honest, doesn't mean that the disbelief of others is also
dishonest, and it is arrogant of you to assume so and project your dishonesty on to other people of whom you know nothing about at all other
than what they say in a few messages on an Internet blog.
An
honest person who openly disagrees with you on a few things is a better choice
than a
dishonest person who claims they believe everything you do, and secretly disagrees with you... or even disdains you for your gullibility.
Husbands and fathers are assumed to be
dishonest and struggle to prove the contrary; less
than honest affidavits and statements are regularly sworn by vengeful parties; and wives and mothers are encouraged to demand to the full the use of the very liberal and ample powers that the courts now have to oust fathers from their own homes and deprive them of any but the most minimal contact with their children.
I would rather have one
honest review
than 15
dishonest ones, so it's all good in my book.
These things are somehow more
than enough to encourage players to put on stupid accents and play the part of
honest, or entirely
dishonest, merchants just trying to make a living.
I don't imagine that climatologists in general start put a any more
honest /
dishonest than any other bunch of individuals.
They are meaningless categories, and the defence that an attempt to point out that they are meaningless categories is semantic play is
dishonest, since it ultimately depends on nothing more
than Curtis's claim that the authors are
honest.
This piece of worthless garbage (the SPIS) is nothing more
than a smoke - screen vehicle to be adopted by sellers (whether
honest or
dishonest in nature, not to mention their ignorance of the state of their own properties) in pursuit of facilitating smooth sales whereby sales would be more difficult to achieve without the supposed «feel good» SPIS boxes being initialed «yes» or «no», as the case may be, reflecting the negative reality, or positive unreality, as the case may be, of the condition / hidden defects of the said listed properties.