Sentences with phrase «dismissal of a legal malpractice»
And the Defense Wins Published by DRI: Dina M. Cox and Kameelah Shaheed - Diallo obtained a dismissal of a legal malpractice claim against their law firm client
http://www.lewiswagner.com/
Won dismissal of legal malpractice claims (and secured award of fees) in a decision affirmed by the New York State Court of Appeals
Summary Dismissal Victory Achieved by Phillip E. Seltzer and Shawn Grinnen In Defense of Lawyer on Claim of Legal Malpractice May 2017 — A first responsive motion for summary dismissal of a legal malpractice claim was recently granted in favor of a Defendant - Lawyer represented by Lipson, Neilson.
By Opinion dated October 24, 2017, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently affirmed a prior trial court victory achieved by the Lipson, Neilson team in obtaining summary dismissal of a legal malpractice claim on the ground of collateral estoppel.
A first responsive motion for summary dismissal of a legal malpractice claim was recently granted in favor of a Defendant - Lawyer represented by Lipson Neilson attorneys Phillip E. Seltzer and Shawn Grinnen.
Davidson v. Gurewitz, NO. 2-15-0171: Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Dismissal of Legal Malpractice Claim
Not exact matches
Summary Dismissal Affirmed In Legal Malpractice Case Where Plaintiff Failed To Show That «Pertinent Decision Makers» Of Government Agency «Would Have» Agreed To A «Better Result» But For The Alleged Incorrect Legal Advice Given By Lawyer During Settlement Negotiations Manveen Saluja, M.D v Honigman Miller Schwartz And Cohn LLP, et al, Unpublished Per Curiam Opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 33036Of Government Agency «Would Have» Agreed To A «Better Result» But For The Alleged Incorrect Legal Advice Given By Lawyer During Settlement Negotiations Manveen Saluja, M.D v Honigman Miller Schwartz And Cohn LLP, et al, Unpublished Per Curiam Opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 33036of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 33036of Appeals, issued March 16, 2017 (Docket No. 330367)