Not exact matches
Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. and FreshDirect CEO Jason Ackerman issued the
following statement today upon learning that the
motion to renew a previously
dismissed lawsuit designed to stop FreshDirect's relocation to The Bronx has been denied by the courts.
A federal judge warned U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara that his «media blitz»
following the arrest of Sheldon Silver endangered Bharara's prosecution of the former Assembly speaker, but ultimately denied Silver's
motion to
dismiss the case.
The
motion to
dismiss the case, filed in a New York court, gave a particularly scathing view of the argument against Apple peppered with such memorable phrases as the
following:
Our Law.com blog compatriot Howard Bashman is also
following developments in the case and posting the legal pleadings, including the complaint, the Web site owner's
motion to
dismiss and affidavit, and now defendant Alesia Roskov's answer and counterclaim.
Motion to be heard 12 (1) If a defendant against whom a proceeding is brought or maintained considers the whole of the proceeding or any claim within the proceeding has been brought in response to their expression or public participation, the defendant may, subject to subsection (2), bring an application for one or more of the
following orders: a) To
dismiss the proceeding or claim, as the case may be; b) For costs and expenses; c) For punitive or exemplary damages against the plaintiff.
The Court of Appeal in Trudel,
following the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Schreiber v. Federal Republic of Germany (2001), 52 O.R. (3d) 577, held that a
motion to
dismiss based on state immunity need not meet the «plain and obvious standard».
All three
motions were
dismissed, with the ONCA providing the
following guidance to practitioners:
Following the Firm's filing a
motion to
dismiss plaintiff's complaint, the case settled on terms favorable to the Firm's clients.
To
follow up on our story about Kentucky's Massey mine that is so unsafe that the Labor Department has moved to shut it down under federal supervision, last week, a federal judge rejected Massey's
motion to
dismiss the government's claim.
Master Baker
dismissed the
motion and made the
following useful comments about document disclosure obligations under the new rules and the concept of proportionality:
The Appeals Court reversed and remanded, reasoning that the trial court incorrectly converted the 12 (b)(6)
motion to
dismiss into a
motion for summary judgment and failed to
follow caselaw related to other similar statutes.
The
motion judge,
following a 12 - day hearing, concluded that there had been no material change in circumstances and
dismissed the father's
motion.
Kaymar's action as against COTA and Carefor was
dismissed following a summary judgment
motion.
In denying the
motion, the court relied on cases in which courts have declined to
dismiss appeals
following briefing and argument, particularly where the judges suspect a party settled to avoid adverse precedent.
In
dismissing ICBC's
motion the Court provided the
following reasons:
The
motion judge
dismissed the defendants»
motion on the basis that the Estate's claim was statute barred, as Mrs. Zimmerman, the Estate trustee, discovered the Acknowledgements in 2010
following her husband's death.