Sentences with phrase «dispute between member states»

The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States which relates to the subject matter of this Treaty if the dispute is submitted to it under a special agreement between the parties.

Far better to ask the Court to resolve it under the special procedure in Article 273 TFEU, which would surely apply: «The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States which relates to the subject matter of the Treaties if the dispute is submitted to it under a special agreement between the parties.»

Not exact matches

Two members of the arbitration panel tasked with resolving a dispute about casino payments between the Seneca Nation and New York State are now in place.

The New York State Public Employment Relations Board has appointed a three - member fact - finding panel that will take testimony, hold hearings and issue a report and recommendations in an effort to resolve the contract dispute between the New York City Department of Education and the UFT.

Discovered by Donald Johanson at Hadar in Ethiopia in 1974 and nicknamed «Lucy» this fossil was the most complete skeleton and oldest member of what was then known of the human lineage but numerous scientists disputed she was truly bipedal, stating this species practiced a form of locomotion intermediate between the quadrupedal tree climbing of chimpanzees and human terrestrial bipedality.

Any disputes between a Member and Fairmont or any Fairmont Party arising out of or related to these Terms and Conditions, including a Member's participation in the Program, shall be brought in the courts of competent jurisdiction of the state of residence of the Member.

A few months ago, AG Wathelet delivered a remarkable defence of investor - state dispute settlement (ISDS) in international investment agreements between Member States in his Opinion in C - 284 / 16 Achmea.

The Opinion is of exceptional length (570 paragraphs, to my knowledge the longest Opinion ever written), and contains an elaborate discussion on the nature of the division of powers between the EU and the Member States and detailed reasoning on specific aspects of the EUSFTA such as transport services, investment protection, procurement, sustainable development, and dispute settlement.

He first analyses «classic disputes» on access to social benefits (cases such as Grzelczyk, Baumbast, Teixeira etc.) and the respective dialogue between the Court, the EU legislator, and the Member States.

This tension can only be resolved by means of an express exclusion of the competence of the ECtHR under Art. 33 ECHT for disputes between EU Member States or between them and the EU which concern the application of the ECHR within the scope ratione materiae of EU law (para 213).

Directive 2006 / 123 / EC (the Services Directive) expressly requires Member States to observe the general principles of non-discrimination, transparency and proportionality, as well as to make available information on «the means of redress in the event of dispute between the competent authorities and the provider or the recipient, or between a provider and a recipient or between providers».

UK businesses entering into contracts with EU member states within the next couple of years will have no idea whether the current regime will apply if and when any dispute arises between them.

He has previously published, amongst others, in European Business Law Review and Transnational Dispute Management on conflicts of investor - State dispute settlement with the EU principle of autonomy and the attribution of international responsibility in investment disputes between EU and its Member Dispute Management on conflicts of investor - State dispute settlement with the EU principle of autonomy and the attribution of international responsibility in investment disputes between EU and its Member dispute settlement with the EU principle of autonomy and the attribution of international responsibility in investment disputes between EU and its Member States.

In your interpretation, is there not a distinction between Member States not submitting disputes outside the judicial system and the EU itself resolving its disputes with third countries by means of international adjudication?

Furthermore, although it is true that the procedure laid down in Article 267 TFEU is an instrument for cooperation between the Court of Justice and the national courts, by means of which the former provides the latter with the points of interpretation of EU law necessary in order for them to decide the disputes before them, the fact remains that when there is no judicial remedy under national law against the decision of a court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal is, in principle, obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU where a question relating to the interpretation of EU law is raised before it...

On 6 March 2018 the Grand Chamber of the CJEU ruled in the Achmea decision (C - 284 / 16) that the bilateral investment treaty (BIT) between The Netherlands and the Slovak Republic violated EU law because it allowed an arbitral tribunal to interpret provisions of EU law in a dispute between investors and (Member) States, while such interpretation...

Chair of a three - member arbitral tribunal hearing a dispute governed by the ICDR Procedures arising from a contract in the biomedical industry between parties in Sweden and the United States.

April 9, 2018 European Court of Justice Rules that Arbitration Agreement in Intra-EU Bilateral Investment Treaty Violates EU law Calling Into Question the Arbitrability of Energy Disputes Between EU Member States

Recent years have thrown up a thriving competitive market between European member states in accommodating investor disputes within the EU and elsewhere following Morrison in the US.

(1) Geographic distribution of professional standards panel members: Inasmuch as disputes may arise between Board Members from different Boards located distant from each other, it is desirable to establish members from the Professional Standards Committee in all areas of themembers: Inasmuch as disputes may arise between Board Members from different Boards located distant from each other, it is desirable to establish members from the Professional Standards Committee in all areas of theMembers from different Boards located distant from each other, it is desirable to establish members from the Professional Standards Committee in all areas of themembers from the Professional Standards Committee in all areas of the state.

(e) Contractual disputes (and specific non-contractual disputes as defined in Standard of Practice 17 - 4) between a REALTOR ® who does not hold membership in any Board, but is directly a member of the State Association, and a REALTOR ® who is a member of a Board.

(d) Contractual disputes (and specific non-contractual disputes as defined in Standard of Practice 17 - 4) between REALTORS ® who are directly members of the State Association and are not members of any Board.

(c) Contractual disputes (and specific non-contractual disputes as defined in Standard of Practice 17 - 4) between REALTORS ® who are not members of the same Board where the matter has been referred to the State Association by both local Boards.