Because Christ's Church is the pillar and bulwark of truth, in
disputes over conflicting interpretations of the Word of God the Church must be capable of discerning true teaching and setting it forth with clarity.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding
conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor
disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
In pinpointing the nature of congregational
conflicts, the study showed that
disputes over «pastoral leadership style» ranked first, particularly among Presbyterian and Assemblies of God ministers.
Were the tensions in Sino - American relations to tip
over into
conflict, involving Taiwan, maritime sovereignty
disputes, or North Korea for example, transatlantic ties would face a hard test.
«Private
conflicts, for example, domestic violence or friendship
disputes over money or girlfriends, can and do spill
over into public spaces, be it on stoops or street corners, in bars or local parks.»
Bitterly
disputed over two centuries, Texas is a cauldron in which Anglo, Native - American, African - American and Hispanic townsfolk debate the
conflicting patrimony of these dry and dusty grasslands.
Children fighting on the playground, teachers struggling to control a difficult class, parents arguing about the time their teenager should be home, neighbour
disputes over land boundaries or anti social behaviours, protests against tyrannical leaders —
conflict happens.
Second, even though Minor claims the
dispute is
over Sotheby's disclosure of an ownership intererst in the Hicks, the
conflict will remind some art market watchers that Minor has a history in the market for American paintings.
Disputed Territory (2006) is a long - term project that examines
conflicts over territory and identity in contemporary Europe.
I never heard about this in the United States, but it is clear that
dispute over water is a big part of the roiling
conflict here.
Too often, he told me many times, parties in
conflict clash
over a tangle of overlapping rights and interests, when the route to resolving each kind of
dispute is very different.
Instead, it intensified the
dispute over the construction of the plant and
over nuclear power in general, while it undermined the legitimacy of traditional channels for resolving
conflict.»
Developing countries, some of which are already embroiled in military
conflict, may be drawn into larger and more protracted
disputes over water, energy supplies or food, all of which may disrupt economic growth at a time when developing countries are beset by more egregious manifestations of climate change.
The
conflict in Congo is complex and is underpinned by a web of long - standing political tensions, ethnic grievances and
disputes over land.
Edward's recent experience includes dealing with property other than land in England, including
disputes concerning a luxury yacht, and also with foreign real property and
conflicts of laws issues, including a claim in connection with a purported sale of a group of Balinese islands, and a case concerning the declaration of trusts pursuant to English law
over French land.
Even handed contracts are much more prone to
conflict than one sided ones, because even handed contracts preserve meaningful rights for both sides that can give both sides legitimate arguments in a particular situation
over which they can fight and will fight no knowing how the
dispute will be resolved.
Maintaining Federal Circuit jurisdiction
over such contractual
disputes to avoid such
conflicting rulings is important to «the federal system as a whole» and not merely «to the particular parties in the immediate suit.»
Jurisdiction
over Family Affairs Cases The Family Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all
disputes and
conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal significance.
For example, the Abritration Center for International
Disputes (ADR.EU) «helps brand and trade mark owners, domain name registrants and registration companies all
over the world to resolve
conflicts in a fast, efficient and cost - effective fashion.»
Disputes can also arise when there is more than one personal representative and they disagree
over issues like taking legal advice and the associated costs, pursuing or defending claims involving the estate and potential
conflicts of interest.
Finding themselves forced to represent themselves, these men and women are struggling to resolve
disputes over child custody, or support, or access, or to resolve a long - running business
conflict, or a dismissal
dispute with an employer.
Many of the commercial and property
disputes in which Piers acts and advises have an international aspect in that they include
disputes over rights to property located abroad and / or raise issues as to the
conflict of laws.
At Hulbert & Associates, LLC, our estate planning and probate attorneys work with the firm's trial attorneys to assure clients of dependable advice and skilled representation in the event of a
dispute over the terms or validity of a will, a trustee's responsibilities to a beneficiary, or
conflicting claims to ownership of assets.
Adeptly applying remarkable mediation and
conflict resolution skills to addressing issues ranging from disagreements
over disciplinary actions taken to salary
disputes.
Applied
over a decade of multi-tasking and organizational skills to provide escalated
dispute and
conflict resolution for customer accounts.
Bill Eddy is the President of the High
Conflict Institute and the author of over ten books about identifying, managing and separating from high - conflict personalities, including High Conflict People in Legal Disputes and Splitting America: How Politicians, Super PACs and the News Media Mirror High Conflict Divorce with Don S
Conflict Institute and the author of
over ten books about identifying, managing and separating from high -
conflict personalities, including High Conflict People in Legal Disputes and Splitting America: How Politicians, Super PACs and the News Media Mirror High Conflict Divorce with Don S
conflict personalities, including High
Conflict People in Legal Disputes and Splitting America: How Politicians, Super PACs and the News Media Mirror High Conflict Divorce with Don S
Conflict People in Legal
Disputes and Splitting America: How Politicians, Super PACs and the News Media Mirror High
Conflict Divorce with Don S
Conflict Divorce with Don Saposnek.
Nan has been working with Baltimore Mediation and Louise Phipps Senft, Esq. for
over 15 years, as an international co-trainer, co-presenter, coach, and mediator.Nan is a dynamic facilitator, author, transformative high
conflict mediator, psychotherapist,
conflict systems design consultant, executive
conflict coach, educator and a founding partner in
Dispute Resolution Professionals, LLC, established in 1997 in the Denver metropolitan area.An expert in high
conflict family systems and multiparty complex workplace
disputes; she was trained as a mediator at Harvard Law School's Program on Negotiation in 1995, as well as USPS Redress training in 1998.
She has mediated
over 2800 cases and was a grievance mediator for United Airlines for 25 years.Nan holds the Advanced Practitioner status in the Workplace, Training and Family Sections of the Association for
Conflict Resolution.Nan is considered a national expert in high conflict family systems and mediates protracted familial disputes in 19
Conflict Resolution.Nan is considered a national expert in high
conflict family systems and mediates protracted familial disputes in 19
conflict family systems and mediates protracted familial
disputes in 19 states.
The parties at issue were divorced parents who were in the midst of a «high
conflict»
dispute over parenting of their children.
The consequences of a move - away case can profoundly impact both the parents and their children and the cases are far more
conflicted than the typical high -
conflict child custody
dispute where the parents fight
over the amount of time each will have with the children.
Boundary
disputes and overlapping claims:
conflict «
over boundaries can cause fighting, not only between family groups, but also within families».
The Right People for Country Project seeks to address uncertainty and
conflict that can be produced by the intersection of native title and cultural heritage legislation by creating an agreement - making structure to deal with
disputes between Aboriginal peoples
over land ownership and cultural heritage.
These
disputes may include
conflict over child care, child support, financial arrangements or property division.
Relationships Australia Victoria (RAV) is a leading training organisation with national and international expertise and
over 65 years» experience in relationship counselling,
conflict resolution, family
dispute resolution (FDR), family relationships, couples therapy and parenting education.
This article is for anyone that has ever experienced a highly contentious legal
conflict, whether it be a divorce and fighting
over children and property division or a particularly bitter small claims contract
dispute.
It causes more fights than sex or household chores, and
conflict over money predicts divorce better than other topics of
dispute.
With Parents Aging, Squabbling Siblings Turn to Elder Mediation» AARP Bulletin «Mediators Help Families with Tough Choices of Aging» NPR Morning Edition «The Caregivers: Sibling
disputes over care» CBS Evening News Video «Mediators Save Caregivers» Relationships» CBSNews.com «Mediators Ease Decisions on Elders» Boston Globe «Elder Mediation: Optimizing Major Family Transitions» Marquette Elder's Advisor Law Review «When Aging Leads to Family
Conflict» Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
a) Before the original Academy of Family Mediators merged with SPIDR (The Society of Professionals in
Dispute Resolution) and CRENET (
Conflict Resolution Education Network) in 2001, it had
over 4,000 family mediation members, and the field was vibrant and expanding.
Marie has
over 200 hours of training in
dispute resolution techniques and has met the mediation training requirements to mediate divorce and family
conflict.
Practice Goals / Target Population
Conflict resolution education (CRE) programs target incidences of opposition or
disputes between youths (such as fights
over possessions or verbal arguments), with the intention of affecting long - term prosocial behaviors of students in grades K — 12.
The goal of mandatory mediation is to disrupt «the escalating cycle of
conflict that so often perpetuates custody
disputes and to shield children from the traumatizing consequences of repeated parental
conflict over their care.»