Not exact matches
One
of our suggestions was that looking at the enforcement
of and compliance with decisions rendered
under international investment treaties could prove a useful means
of measuring progress on the rule
of law, since the way
countries deal with their
disputes provides evidence
of accountability.
Section 2 (c)
of the Act defines the term «International Commercial Arbitration» and it means an Arbitration relating to
disputes arising out
of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, considered as commercial
under the
law in force in Bangladesh and where at least one
of the parties is: (i) an individual who is a national
of or habitually resident in, any
country other than Bangladesh; or (ii) a body corporate which is incorporated in any
country other than Bangladesh; or (iii) a company or an association or a body
of individuals whose central management and control is exercised in any
country other than Bangladesh, or (iv) the Government
of a foreign
country.
Students will develop tools for transnational practice by analyzing the myriad
of legal issues involved in the trade
of goods and services, including investment and intellectual property protection among the
countries of Canada, Mexico and the U.S. Special attention will be given to methods
of resolving
disputes under NAFTA, and to the controversies
of environmental and labor
law enforcement
under the NAFTA Side Agreements.
In international investment treaty and commercial arbitrations in virtually every
country in Central and South America
under all major arbitral rules and institutions, including among others International Centre for Settlement
of Investment
Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber
of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade
Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for
Dispute Resolution («ICDR»);
A court may not recognize a foreign -
country judgment if: the judgment was rendered
under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements
of due process
of law, as determined by the court using standards developed by the American Law Institute and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law to govern resolution of transnational disputes; the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matt
law, as determined by the court using standards developed by the American
Law Institute and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law to govern resolution of transnational disputes; the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matt
Law Institute and the International Institute for the Unification
of Private
Law to govern resolution of transnational disputes; the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matt
Law to govern resolution
of transnational
disputes; the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter.