Sentences with phrase «district court in this case»

«Because Congress did not have a «strong basis of evidence» upon which to conclude that DoD was a passive participant in pervasive, nationwide racial discrimination — at least not on the evidence produced by DoD and relied on by the district court in this case — the statute fails strict scrutiny,» the decision stated.

A special case - specific moment: The Supreme Court has pending before it a crack - sentencing case, Claiborne v. US, although the district court in that case imposed a below - guideline sentence (which the Eighth Circuit reversed as too short).

The Court of Appeal here has taken an approach to American jurisprudence that diverges from that taken by this Court in Instead of drawing on the American law of fair use to inform the Canadian law of fair dealing, the Court of Appeal has arrived at a result that is directly opposite to the result arrived at by the United States District Court in a case with virtually identical facts.

Not exact matches

The case is In re: Facebook Inc IPO Securities and Derivative Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12 - md - 02389.

But without a majority decision on Halo, it could be more difficult for district courts to award attorneys» fees to prevailing parties in patent troll cases, which every year sap billions of dollars in such fees.

The eight - justice court is hearing arguments Monday in two cases that deal with the same basic issue of whether race played too large a role in the drawing of electoral districts, to the detriment of African - Americans.

The case being led by Texas and filed at the Federal Court in the Southern District of Texas said the executive order announced by Obama last month violated constitutional limits on presidential powers.

He is expected to appear on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Sherman, Texas, and on Nov. 14 in federal court in Manhattan after the case is transfeCourt in Sherman, Texas, and on Nov. 14 in federal court in Manhattan after the case is transfecourt in Manhattan after the case is transferred.

Luckily for Ms. Cammelleri the judge in the case, Robert Hendrickson of the 12th Ohio District Court of Appeals, disagreed.

The case is In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11 - md - 02293.

The case is Fox Television Stations, Inc v. FilmOn X, LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 12 - cv - 6921.

HiQ took LinkedIn to court, and the case is currently mired in the appeals process after a U.S. district court judge in the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injunction against Ldistrict court judge in the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injunction against LDistrict of California granted a preliminary injunction against LinkedIn.

The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California is Douglas O'Connor et al vs. Uber Technologies Inc, 13 - 3826.

In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as welIn the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as Court ruled 5 - 4 that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to own guns — at a federal level — and in 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as welin 2010 the court said that protection applies at a local level as court said that protection applies at a local level as well.

The case is In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 15 - cv - 03747, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

The case is In re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 15 - mc - 01404.

Especially during September, 190 cases having to do with private lending disputes, and concerning nearly 300 million yuan, were filed in courts in Luwan district, where most of the business owners who have disappeared had their factories.

On April 11, 2018, Patrick K. McDonnell — a defendant in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's case against CabbageTech, Corp (DBA Coin Drop Markets)-- submitted a letter to Judge Roanne L. Mann of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

The case is In re BCBG Max Azria Global Holdings LLC, 17 - 10466, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

One case in a California district court was voluntarily dismissed within two weeks of its filing, which could be an indication of a settlement or private arbitration.

DOL filed a motion Friday requesting that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas be consolidated; the plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each of the cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»

DOL filed a request on June 20 that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas be consolidated; the plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each of the cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»

The Department of Justice defended the rule when it filed papers in July in a Washington district court arguing against the case filed by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

The case, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

He has also filed amicus briefs in landmark patent and other cases to district courts, the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court involving patenting issues relevant to biotechnology.

«The Movants have had ample opportunity to intervene in the multiple cases challenging the so - called «Fiduciary Rule» in district courts around the country, in appeals in two other circuits courts, and in this appeal, which was decided by this Court more than a month ago,» the filing said.

According to Bloomberg, the case in question is Tucker v. Chase Bank USA NA, 18 - cv - 3155, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

After a volley of filings and rebuttals in the case, both sides appeared Tuesday in U.S. Federal District Court in New York City to make their cases.

The lawsuit, comprised of many federal cases consolidated in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Boston, charged that TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (NYSE: TDCHF) conspired to fraudulently market, sell and distribute Lupron, causing consumers to pay inflated prices for the drug.

«Based on the advice of counsel, I will assert my 5th Amendment rights in connection with all proceedings in this case due to the ongoing criminal investigation by the FBI and U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York,» Cohen wrote in the filing in Los Angeles federal court.

The first line of cases began with In re Daou Sys., where the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision dismissing a Section 10 (b) action on the ground that the plaintiffs had not alleged any disclosures that defendants were engaging in improper accounting practiceIn re Daou Sys., where the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision dismissing a Section 10 (b) action on the ground that the plaintiffs had not alleged any disclosures that defendants were engaging in improper accounting practicein improper accounting practices.

The district court in First Solar ultimately applied the standard from the Daou line of cases and held that plaintiffs did not need to show that the market reacted to the fact that First Solar had committed fraud in order to satisfy the loss causation requirement.

However, the district court in First Solar recognized that a second line of Ninth Circuit cases had applied a different standard.

The case is to go to trial in U.S. District Court in Miami in March.

A federal district court in Washington, D.C. heard arguments Aug. 25 in one case filed by the National Association of Fixed Annuities.

Among the many notable decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in the area of religion was the 1963 case Abington Township School District v. Schempp, which held that tax - supported schools were only allowed to teach about religion.

Raymond Abbott's name appeared as lead plaintiff in a court case brought by Camden and several other poor school districts against the State of New Jersey, demanding that the state provide equal funding for all schools.

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

In a decision that is encouraging for the mediating - structures approach, the Supreme Court held (5 - 4) in Boiuen v. Kendrick that the AFLA is constitutional on its face, remanding the case to the District Court for consideration of whether it had been applied unconstitutionally in specific instanceIn a decision that is encouraging for the mediating - structures approach, the Supreme Court held (5 - 4) in Boiuen v. Kendrick that the AFLA is constitutional on its face, remanding the case to the District Court for consideration of whether it had been applied unconstitutionally in specific instancein Boiuen v. Kendrick that the AFLA is constitutional on its face, remanding the case to the District Court for consideration of whether it had been applied unconstitutionally in specific instancein specific instances.

In the original court case, District Judge Isobel Brownlie ruled that religious beliefs could not dictate the law and ordered the firm to pay damages of # 500.

Rubashkin's lawyers claimed Thursday that U.S. District Court Chief Judge Linda Reade, the judge in the case, met with the law - enforcement team that participated in the May 2008 immigration raid of Agriprocessors kosher meatpacking plant in Postville, Iowa.

In a December 3, 2017 order dismissing the case that is likely to be viewed with some relief by many dairy companies, US district judge Katherine B Forrest agreed with Dannon, noting that a court handling a similar false advertising lawsuit about «non-GMO» claims on dairy products fed GM feed (Gallagher v. Chipotle Mexican Grill) rejected a similar claim at the pleading stage.

In a case similar to the Gaidry case, New Iberia Extract Co. v. McIlhenny Sons, the New Iberia Company had recently recovered damages against McIlhenny Sons in the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on a similar cause of action, New Iberia Extract Co. v. E. McIlhenny, 182 La. 150 [8 T. M. Rep. 189], the decision having been based largely on the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, cancelling the Mcllhenny Company registration of «Tabasco» as its trade - marIn a case similar to the Gaidry case, New Iberia Extract Co. v. McIlhenny Sons, the New Iberia Company had recently recovered damages against McIlhenny Sons in the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on a similar cause of action, New Iberia Extract Co. v. E. McIlhenny, 182 La. 150 [8 T. M. Rep. 189], the decision having been based largely on the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, cancelling the Mcllhenny Company registration of «Tabasco» as its trade - marin the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on a similar cause of action, New Iberia Extract Co. v. E. McIlhenny, 182 La. 150 [8 T. M. Rep. 189], the decision having been based largely on the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, cancelling the Mcllhenny Company registration of «Tabasco» as its trade - mark.

Once the case actually went to trial in a criminal court, the district attorney dropped the charges, making Hardy a free man.

Wednesday's decision to move the case by U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, is a defeat for ABC News, a unit of Walt Disney Co, and returned the lawsuit by Beef Products Inc (BPI) and two affiliates back to the Union County Circuit Court in that state.

In its court papers on Wednesday, ABC filed a removal notice to shift the case from Union County Circuit Court in South Dakota to the federal district court for the District of South Dakota, Southern DivisioIn its court papers on Wednesday, ABC filed a removal notice to shift the case from Union County Circuit Court in South Dakota to the federal district court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Divicourt papers on Wednesday, ABC filed a removal notice to shift the case from Union County Circuit Court in South Dakota to the federal district court for the District of South Dakota, Southern DiviCourt in South Dakota to the federal district court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Divisioin South Dakota to the federal district court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Ddistrict court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Divicourt for the District of South Dakota, Southern DDistrict of South Dakota, Southern Division.

Of nearly 1,500 reported cases of injuries suffered on Chicago Park District properties last year, for example, only four resulted in court settlements or findings of park district liability, said park district Treasurer Jack District properties last year, for example, only four resulted in court settlements or findings of park district liability, said park district Treasurer Jack district liability, said park district Treasurer Jack district Treasurer Jack Mathews.

Mayor Sam Tenuto said this week that the village would ask a court to rule at once in its legal fight with the park district, and he suggested that the village drop a counterclaim attached to the case.

LINCOLN PARK — A lawyer for a residents» group fighting construction of a soccer field in Lincoln Park said Latin School and the Chicago Park District had approached them about settling the case before it goes to court.

But the park district contends in its petition filed Friday with the Illinois Appellate Court that the statute of limitations does not apply to this case because the transfer was illegal, and that Glenview and Northbrook would not suffer harm if they gave the land back, according to spokesmen for Friedman & Holtz, a Chicago law firm representing the Northfield Park Ddistrict contends in its petition filed Friday with the Illinois Appellate Court that the statute of limitations does not apply to this case because the transfer was illegal, and that Glenview and Northbrook would not suffer harm if they gave the land back, according to spokesmen for Friedman & Holtz, a Chicago law firm representing the Northfield Park DistrictDistrict.