Sentences with phrase «district court ruling»

The federal district court ruled in favor of the city.

If a federal district court rules a city or state law unconstitutional, state courts do not have to obey that ruling.

Because appellate procedure can be very different from regular district court rules, many litigants choose to use a different attorney for appellate work than for district court / trial work.

This feature article focuses on a recent U.S. District Court ruling in favor of the Thyssen - Bornemisza Collection Foundation and the Kingdom of Spain in an artwork dispute that spanned a decade.

The Amsterdam District Court ruled in July that Tom Kabinet can stay open for business during a legal battle against the Dutch Publishers Association.

Chinese exchanges are not operating illegally and will not be sued, Beijing Haidian District Court ruled on Monday.

The San - Francisco district court ruled in late November that Coinbase must hand over user accounts at the exchange that bought, sold, sent or received sums of $ 20,000 and higher between 2013 and 2015.

The decision also reversed an earlier District Court ruling that McKesson could base its claim on customary international law while maintaining that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act does not shield Iran from liability.

Following a lengthy legal battle between the two entities, the San - Francisco district court ruled Tuesday that Coinbase must hand over user accounts at the exchange that bought, sold, sent or received sums of $ 20,000 and higher between 2013 and 2015.

A Beijing district court ruled in favor of Tencent in early July, according to the court's website.

What the correct legal status now is of Judge Vaughn Walker's bizarre district court ruling is an interesting question.

But on 19 July the Arizona - based firm lost a major decision when a jury in a US district court ruled that Darryl Turner, a 17 - year - old shop assistant in Charlotte, North Carolina, had been killed by a police taser after receiving an extended 37 - second shock.

This past month, an Ohio district court ruled that several online self - publishing services were not liable for right of publicity or privacy claims for distributing an erotic (and so - called «less than tasteful») book whose cover contained an unauthorized copy of the plaintiffs» engagement photo because such services are not publishers.

Well, at least almonds, according to a recent federal district court ruling against a group of California almond growers.A federal judge has rejected a challenge by fifteen California organic almond growers to halt the mandatory treatment of raw almonds as required by the Almond Board of California.

We anticipate that the Maryland District Court ruling will also be appealed.

In several District Court rulings handed down recently, the Courts determined that the liability of such dual listed companies towards their Israeli public shareholder will be examined according to the foreign law applicable to the said companies» reports.

The Edinburgh District Court ruled that Dean could be extradited but the Scottish Appeal Court disagreed.

Of course, that comes on the heels of a federal district court ruling not long ago that struck down a ban in the Alabama Constitution on same sex marriage.

The April 2015 district court ruling concerning Warner Chilcott's Doryx ® was affirmed by the Third Circuit in September 2016, creating an important precedent, particularly in the life sciences sector, for companies facing these challenges globally.

In Clark County, court procedure is also governed by the Eighth Judicial District Court Rules.

Rules Of Practice And Procedure In Certain District Courts Rules Of Practice In Justice Courts

Dermot Ahern (FF / LH; Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform) has announced the introduction of new District Court Rules to amend the small claims procedure of the District Court, commonly referred to as the Small Claims Court (SCC).

Two of those arrested remain in custody after a Reykjanes District Court ruling, though it is unclear what role they allegedly played in the heists.

Interestingly, in an important and bold decision, Justice John M. Woolsey of the U.S. District Court ruled in United States v.

The Amsterdam District Court ruled that website Tom Kabinet can stay open for business during a legal battle... [Read more...]

Following a lengthy legal battle between the two entities, the San - Francisco district court ruled Tuesday that Coinbase must hand

A federal district court ruled earlier this year that the plaintiffs» claim alleging a freight company's liability for injuries sustained in an accident caused by the negligence of a driver employed by another company hired to transport materials on the freight company's behalf should be heard by a jury.

Last week, a United States District Court ruling in the Central District of California, Timothy D. Reuben v. United States, disagreed with other courts that have considered the question and held in favor of the IRS, finding that the shares had zero basis.

Yesterday, a federal district court ruled that the US Forest Service did not violate the Establishment Clause by renewing a permit for «Big Mountain Jesus» (left), a six - foot - tall statue on land the Service leases to a private ski resort in Big Mountain, Montana.

It was in 1969 that Judge James McMillan of the Federal District Court ruled that the district had been intentionally segregated» virtually all black students went to all - black schools» and ordered a district - wide busing system to achieve integration.

The district court ruled it violated PASPA, and the decision was upheld by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

They also vacated the district court ruling.

On May 22, as reported here earlier, a U.S. District Court ruled that California's ballot access law for newly - qualifying parties is probably unconstitutional, and enjoined the state from enforcing the deadline.

A split Second Circuit overturned a district court ruling that a New York law requiring nonresident attorneys to keep a physical office in the state as a prerequisite to practice is unconstitutional, saying it wasn't implemented for protectionist reasons.

A district court ruled in May 2006 that he should be extradited, a decision upheld at London's High Court in April 2007.

Then in August came the federal District Court ruling that the order violated a law that banned federal funds from destroying embryos.

Last October, a three - judge panel overturned a U.S. district court ruling that found the university's Benjamin Banneker Scholarship program for black students constitutional.

Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, a Democrat, opposed the Republican - led measure, but let it become law to break a stalemate over how to address a December U.S. District Court ruling that meted out daily fines to the...

In a 2 - 1 decision on November 11, 2015, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a district court ruling that granted the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) pre-clearance review of the Louisiana Scholarship Program (LSP), arguing that the lower court exceeded its scope of authority.

Though a district court ruled in favor of the school district, the parents appealed to the Fifth Circuit.

A U.S. District Court ruled that several off - shore companies violated patents and trademarks owned by Omix - Ada / Rugged Ridge, and had participated in the manufacture of counterfeit products.

In March 2010, a U.S. District Court ruled that the company's patent claims were invalid because genetic material was, in fact, a product of nature.

The Amsterdam District Court ruled that website Tom Kabinet can stay open for business during a legal battle against the Dutch Publishers Association.

The U.S. Supreme Court will not review a decision by an Appeals Court that upheld a District Court ruling that Apple conspired to fix the retail price for newly released and bestselling trade e-books in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The Amsterdam District Court ruled that different interpretations of the role of director were the principal reason for his firing.

The district court ruling rested on the principle that the government has a duty of care towards its citizens.