However, by delivering roughly equivalent funding increases to
districts at all income levels, Democrat - led reforms do not target new resources to districts serving poor students.
Not exact matches
There is an obvious disparity between the funds made available by the federal government to support free meals for low -
income students and the revenue collected by school
districts (from federal «paid» meal reimbursements and student payments) to support the very same meals when served to children
at higher
income levels.
Even though almost every student
at the KIPP Academy... is from a low -
income family, and all but a few are either black or Hispanic, and most enter below grade
level, they are still a step above other kids in the neighborhood; on their math tests in the fourth grade (the year before they arrived
at KIPP), KIPP students in the Bronx scored well above the average for the
district, and on their fourth - grade reading tests they often scored above the average for the entire city.
We didn't think we could get the attention of (much less have an impact on) traditional schools without proving that low -
income kids could be served
at a scale akin to a
district and achieve
at high
levels.
At least since the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954, this has been interpreted to give the federal government the power to intervene in cases of legally sanctioned discrimination, like the segregation of public schools across the country; to mandate equal access to education for students with disabilities; and, according to some arguments, to correct for persistently unequal access to resources across states and
districts of different
income levels.
She found that student performance is better in areas with competing multiple
districts, where parents
at the same
income level can move to another locality, in search of a better education.
Such efforts share a single set of beliefs: Low -
income kids are capable of achieving
at the highest
levels; great schools can make a world of difference; the traditional urban school
district is not the only path to great schools.
She found that student performance is better in areas with competing multiple
districts, where parents
at the same
income level can move —
at the margin — from one locality to another nearby, in search of a better education for their children.
In Detroit, the median household
income is $ 54,000,63 but in Grosse Pointe, the median household
income is $ 101,000.64 Such stories highlight the saddening reality that, increasingly, wealth separates students
at the classroom, school, and
district levels.
As Eva Moskowitz puts it: «If (we) backfilled older grades... the
incoming students» lower relative academic preparation would adversely affect the schools» other students... We have an obligation to the parents in middle and high school, and the kids in middle and high school, that until the
district schools are able to do a better job, it's not really fair for the seventh - grader or high school student to have to be educated with a child who's reading
at a second - or third - grade
level.»
In particular, ESEA reauthorization provides an opportunity for Congress to consider fresh ideas that would support states and
districts in increasing school funding equity so that students in low -
income communities receive the resources they need to achieve
at high
levels.
For most
districts, funding has been restored to pre-recession
levels, and the Legislature adopted the Local Control Funding Formula, based on a paper that Liu co-wrote as a law professor
at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, which provides extra money for low -
income students and English learners.
In addition to meeting ESSA accountability requirements, the inclusion of chronic absence in state accountability rubrics also provides real opportunities for states,
districts and philanthropists to achieve the goals of the Campaign for Grade -
Level Reading, to increase the number of children from low -
income families reading proficiently
at the end of third grade.
The
district's AVID / TOPS (for Advancement Via Individual Determination / Teens of Promise) program serves primarily low -
income and non-white students
at the middle and high school
levels.
The State of Washington will be holding a press conference on August 18, 2015
at 10 am to release the disaggregated
district -
level results for their state which will undoubtedly reveal that the SBAC test particularly discriminates against children from low -
income homes, children who face English language barriers and children who need special education services.
Teachers with students with higher
incoming achievement
levels receive classroom observation scores that are higher on average than those received by teachers whose
incoming students are
at lower achievement
levels, and
districts do not have processes in place to address this bias.