Almost as stupid as STAR where New York intentionally overtaxes to build up money to write rebate checks for people like Rump... and to give more aid to wealthy school
districts than poor ones.
Not exact matches
«That means that we can now focus our efforts in the coming years on getting New York City schools the Campaign for Fiscal Equity money they are still owed and building equity into the state aid formula so that
poor school
districts get more state aid
than wealthier
ones,» Mulgrew said.
They say they've already cut back and laid off and that a cap would erode arts, sports and special programs, and hurt
poorer and rural
districts, which are more dependent on state aid
than rich
ones with greater property wealth.
In fact,
one such group, funded in part by the hedge funder currently trying to murder Argentina for fun and profit, is spending more
than three times the
poors entire budget in just
one sleepy upstate Senate
district.
What about those states at the bottom of Education Trust's spectrum, the
ones that spend considerably less on
poor districts than on rich
ones?
Part of the answer is in the question: states that spend considerably more on
poor districts than rich
ones can be ranked very low by Education Week because the McLoone Index is measuring the cost of increasing the spending on rich
districts toward that on
poor ones.
Concerned that varying education programs are creating «two Connecticuts,
one for the rich and
one for the
poor,» the state's department of education is studying whether wealthy
districts offer substantially better programs
than poorer ones.
In previous work,
one of us found that Washington State's 2004 compensatory allocation formula ensured that affluent Bellevue School
District, in which only 18 percent of students qualify for free or reduced - price lunch, receives $ 1,371 per
poor student in state compensatory funds, while large urban
districts received less
than half of that for each of their impoverished students (see Figure 2).
Nevada is
one of only 10 states with negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, property -
poor districts actually have more state and local revenue for education
than wealthy
districts do.
Wealthy school
districts in Connecticut typically spent $ 1,227 more per student
than poorer ones during the 1981 - 82 school year, according to a recent state report.
But Oklahoma is
one of only 10 states with negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, property -
poor districts actually have more state and local revenue for education
than wealthy
districts do.
Utah is
one of only 10 states that have negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, students in property -
poor districts actually receive more funding per pupil
than students living in wealthy areas.
The technology gap in public education is narrowing, with
one computer for every 5.3 students in America's
poorest districts — less
than half a student behind the national average.
Even students in the
poorest districts appear to do better in a competitive system, as exists in the Boston area,
than they do in areas in which
one or two
districts dominate a metropolitan area, like Miami.
The NCLB law gives parents the choice to withdraw their students and send them elsewhere, rather
than address the concentration of low - performing minority students — typically
poor ones — that did not have the resources to get find their way to more distant schools in their own
districts.
For instance, at Cleveland's George Washington Carver Elementary School, located in
one of that city's
poorest neighborhoods, 73 percent of the fourth graders passed the state reading test — a big jump from previous years and more
than double the school
district average.
Because more
than 90 percent of school revenues come from state and local sources, lawmakers worried that
districts would play a shell game with new Title I funds — transferring a dollar of local resources to rich schools from
poor ones for every new federal dollar earmarked for
poor schools that arrived.
To achieve this vision, combined state,
district, and school efforts must close significant and persistent achievement gaps, which occur when
one student group statistically outperforms another.18 However, data from international, national, and state - level sources all confirm that nonwhite, disabled,
poor, and non-English-speaking students perform more poorly
than their peers outside of these groups.19
Probationary teachers with more
than one poor observation would be given limited support and then terminated if they do not improve It's time for
districts to take advantage of this time period to weed out ineffective teachers.»
Ohio's «2011 - 12 value - added results show that
districts, schools and teachers with large numbers of
poor students tend to have lower value - added results
than those that serve more - affluent
ones.»
Barbourville, Ky., the
poorest school
district, spends less
than one - third that amount.
One way it has done this is to establish schools in
poor districts, which may receive more funding
than rich
ones in some states.