Where trial justices have reviewed a petition to enforce an arbitration award and issued findings, the supreme court stated «the findings of a trial justice sitting without a jury are entitled to great weight and will not be
disturbed on appeal unless it can be shown that such findings are clearly wrong or that the trial justice misconceived or overlooked material evidence.»
Factual determinations are typically not
disturbed on appeal.
The trial judge's findings of actual prejudice were not
disturbed on appeal.
`... The exercise of that discretion will not be
disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of abuse.
Discretionary orders of prothonotaries ought not be
disturbed on appeal to a judge unless: a) the questions raised in the motion are vital to the final issue of the case, or b) the orders are clearly wrong, in the sense that the exercise of discretion by the prothonotary was based upon a wrong principle or upon a misapprehension of the facts.
Not exact matches
It also asserts that the companies relied
on advertising, with messages of combat dominance and slogans like «Consider your man card reissued,» that
appealed specifically to
disturbed young men like Adam Lanza, the 20 - year - old gunman.
The Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, recently made remarks over
disturbing conflicting tribunals and
Appeal Court judgments
on the use of the card reader.
More
disturbing, are the conflicting judgments of the various Divisions of the
Appeal Court
on the use and status of the card reader.
The MPAA rated Hotel Rwanda PG - 13
on appeal for violence,
disturbing images and brief strong language.
I got them, played them, finished them and so
on, however, silent hill really stood out for me due to the ambiguity of its surroundings, the focus
on psychological horror which was unheard of in games at the time, eerie soundtrack,
disturbing environments, the amazing puzzles, the unforgettable scenes such as when Lisa was bleeding off to death due to Samael's possession and the fact that the hell the character was experiencing didn't have much explanation at the time and that added to the
appeal of the game.
«Where [an] evidentiary foundation exists and the record discloses that the trial court has given consideration to each of the statutory factors, we will not
disturb its determination as to spousal support
on appeal.»
Arguably, instead of alleviating the alleged chill
on free expression, Bill 83, if passed, will
disturb the current balance between the right to protect ones reputation and freedom of expression, will restrict access to the courts and will result in increased litigation, numerous and costly motions and
appeals, and create greater delay in getting to trial, in what is already an overburdened judicial system.
It is unclear how other courts would rule
on this, but two things are for sure: 1) a reputable NY court determined that you must intend to flee the scene in order to be convicted and 2) being mentally
disturbed — even for a short period of time — might be enough to get your hit and run ticket dismissed
on appeal.