The fairly bland aesthetics and the fact that you might have to traipse through the same sections over and over again to find
divergence points resulted may result in you finding it hard to muster the willpower to start over after a while.
Not exact matches
,
pointing out the widening
divergence between income and expenditures and the
resulting worrisome drop in the savings rate.
Is it reasonable to believe that over time, as more data
points are entered into the historical record, there will be less
divergence between the
results obtained from use of the slower and harder methodology and from use of the faster and easier methodology?
You will click through dialog choices, of which, at least from my experience, feels like there is little
divergence in story or alignment based on how you respond; the end
result always seems to be the new objective
points revealing themselves on the map.