An active fund has greater
diversification than an index product, even if the fee is slightly more.
Not exact matches
They fail to appreciate that even 30 or 40 individual companies provides less
diversification than even one broad - market
index fund.
I wonder if an ETF like Canadian Fundamental
Index Fund (CRQ) may be a better choice for the Canadian market since it has a little more
diversification across sectors and not quite as much in Energy / Materials
than say XIU?
These multinational funds don't have long return histories, but the experts who follow them believe that combining U.S. and international real - estate investments will produce higher returns
than the S&P 500
index, along with currency
diversification.
By weighting securities in broad market
indices based on revenue rather
than market capitalization, the fundamentally weighted strategies offer the opportunity to reduce overexposure to potentially overpriced sectors and stocks while still providing the broad
diversification of an
index.
True
diversification requires more
than just stock investing: remember that
index funds only go up when the entire economy goes up — and we have happened to enjoy a 25 year joyride of amazing overall market returns.
Only 10 real estate investment trusts (REITs) account for more
than 1/3 of the capitalization - weighted MSCI US REIT
Index, potentially resulting in higher risk and inadequate
diversification relative to RORE's diversified approach.
For these reasons, I suggest that RESP investors use
index funds rather
than ETFs: something simple like the Global Couch Potato (assembled with TD e-Series funds) is all the
diversification you need.
The result is that market participants may achieve more
diversification and inflation protection
than with just equities or with any single asset inside the
index.
It turns out that this finer - grained
diversification across entirely separate independent holdings is also less risky
than a single
index holding.
However, for investors willing to do the work, investing in individual stocks can lead to much higher returns
than broad
diversification into
index funds.
This is one of the main arguments for
index funds — if
diversification is good, then more
diversification must be better
than less
diversification.
Optimizing using the S&P 500
index to represent U.S. stocks, and then actually using a growth mutual fund (that owns 75 stocks) would result in much less
diversification than the report stated.